To: libstripper
Sending dogs to an Islamic country? What could go wrong?
2 posted on
09/16/2019 11:52:36 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
To: ClearCase_guy
Sending dogs to an Islamic country? What could go wrong? Well, if the dog handlers are female, they would probably be raped as well.
10 posted on
09/16/2019 12:00:20 PM PDT by
PGR88
To: ClearCase_guy
“Sending dogs to an Islamic country? What could go wrong?”
Yeah, who’s the f’n genius who thought this one up!
To: ClearCase_guy
Outrageous!! I know that my former job would have been very greatful to have those dogs!!. INSTEAD WE GIVE THEM TO SAVAGES FROM THE 3RD CENTURY. 2 words to fix the middle east... Nuclear weapons!!
28 posted on
09/16/2019 12:34:18 PM PDT by
MGunny
To: ClearCase_guy
Photos in the report, published last week, show emaciated dogs with ribs protruding from their sides. Their nails are overgrown, and their ears are home to ticks so engorged they have likely been feasting on the dogs for days. In some facilities, there weren't any dog bowls -- the handlers fed the dogs by simply throwing food on the floor.
Anyone who knows anything at all about the s***hole countries, should know dogs are not treated well there. The very best outcome one could hope for is neglect. At least, so far as we know the dogs were not tortured.
29 posted on
09/16/2019 12:35:10 PM PDT by
The_Media_never_lie
(Please, oh pretty please let Crazy Uncle Joe Biden be the nominee.)
To: ClearCase_guy
The problem is that the dogs were probably brought into the people’s houses. That is what’s listed as inadequate kennels. They may have survived longer is the kennels.
rwood
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson