Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former Yazedi Sex Slave Survived 14 Islamic Rapists…
Religion of Peace (ROP) ^ | Sept 10, 2019 | Hollie McKay

Posted on 09/13/2019 10:57:23 PM PDT by robowombat

Yazidi sex slave survivor to face one of her ISIS rapists in German court By Hollie McKay

On a bitter day in the dead of winter, as 2017 was drawing to a close, Shatha Salim Bashar was rescued from hell.

The Yazidi made it home after almost three-and-a-half years as an ISIS sex slave in Iraq and Syria.

“I can’t forget the first time I was raped,” Shatha, 28, told Fox News. “I was traded 14 times among the jihadists.”

She was kidnapped alongside her mother, her sister, and two younger brothers. In the beginning, she pretended to be the mother of her youngest brother, aged just 3 – in the hopes she would be spared violation if ISIS militants believed she was not a virgin.

But Shatha was violated by every one of her 14 enslavers. Moreover, the tiny young woman was used as a human shield by ISIS, thrust onto the frontlines in Syria and forced to watch her best Yazidi friend die on the battlefield. Her reunification months later should have been one of jubilation – but her friend’s family also arrived with smiles, thinking the women were rescued together. Shatha was the one to break the shattering news.

YAZIDIS SEEK RESCUE OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN ENSLAVED, MARRIED OFF TO ISIS

In spite of all she has endured since ISIS suddenly stormed her village of Kocho, in the foothills of Iraq’s Sinjar Mountain on August 15, 2014, Shatha’s scars – inside and out – have become her stories.

Next month, Shatha will travel to Germany and face one of her alleged rapists in the court of law as he stands trial for ISIS membership in his European home of origin, a representative for the Kurdish President’s Office told Fox News. She intends to testify against him.

On a bitter day in the dead of winter, as 2017 was drawing to a close, Shatha Salim Bashar, now 28, was rescued from ISIS sex slavery On a bitter day in the dead of winter, as 2017 was drawing to a close, Shatha Salim Bashar, now 28, was rescued from ISIS sex slavery (Office of Kidnapped Affairs)

It has been more than five years since ISIS ravaged the villages of Iraq’s Sinjar Mountain – slaughtering thousands of Yazidi boys and men and abducting thousands of girls and women into their ranks of sex slavery.

And Shatha wants to be a voice for the voiceless. She wants to remind the world not to forget their fractured community who are left languishing with little in the way of help.

According to statistics issued to Fox News from the Office of Kidnapped Affairs – established in 2014 by the now President of the semi-autonomous Kurdistan Regional Government, Nechirvan Barzani, to rescue kidnapped Yazidis – 550,000 Yazidis remain in war-ravaged Iraq. Some 360,000 of them are still in displacement.

At least 1,293 Yazidis were killed on August 3 and over the following few days at the beginning of the ISIS invasion. A total of 6,417 Yazidi were kidnapped at that time – 3,548 females and 2,869 males. Some 3509 Yazidis are documented as having survived the ordeal: 1192 women, 337 men, 1033 girls, and 947 boys. Chillingly, 2,908 Yazidis are deemed still missing – 1323 females and 1585 males.

The number of orphans produced by the invasion stands at 2,745 and the number of Yazidis who have emigrated out of Iraq, their ancestral homeland, is documented to be more than 100,000.

Moreover, 80 mass graves have been discovered in the Sinjar region, and the Islamic terrorist outfit blitzed 68 of their religious temples throughout the four-year war.

June 20, 2015: Yazidi refugees hold banners at a Syrian and Iraqi refugee camp in the southern Turkish town of Midyat. (REUTERS) June 20, 2015: Yazidi refugees hold banners at a Syrian and Iraqi refugee camp in the southern Turkish town of Midyat. (REUTERS) While the Office of Kidnapped Affairs rescued Shatha, along with her mother and sister, her brothers – who were just 8 and 3, remain unaccounted for. The last she saw of the small boys, they were carted off to ISIS training camps.

“We need help to rescue the rest of the people that are still missing,” Shatha said.

The Office of Kidnapped Affairs made its most recent rescue last week – two Yazidi girls were brought back from the rebel-stronghold of Idlib, Syria. Since the “Caliphate” formally crumbled earlier this year, the Office has spread its resources into locating the lost girls and boys across Syria and Turkey. Many of them are believed to be disguised as Muslim wives; still entangled in their terrorist purgatory.

Shatha’s brothers are two of thousands of Yazidi boys yanked into the ISIS lair of forced conversion, indoctrination, and violence.

“Yazidi boys who are forced into Cubs of the Caliphate training often are the amongst the most courageous fighters and volunteer for suicide missions, believing they will go to the ‘The Paradise,'” said Anne Speckhard, director of the Study of Violent Extremism (ICSVE) and Adjunct Associate Professor of Psychiatry at Georgetown University. “These boys were separated from their older male relatives by ISIS who shot them dead and from their mothers and sisters. Of course, they would opt for any escape offered to them – a palatable escape from overwhelming psychic pain and unbearable traumatic grief.”

Subsequently, Hussein al-Qaedi, the Yazidi Director of the Office for Kidnapped Affairs, is calling for permission from the central government to conduct DNA testing inside the detainment facilities where foreign ISIS fighters and their families are held.

“We believe Yazidis are among them. If countries take back foreign fighters, they might take Yazidi kids with them,” he stressed. “And then they will be disappeared forever.”

Hussein al-Qaedi, the Yazidi Director of the Office for Kidnapped Affairs, is calling for permission from the central government to conduct DNA testing inside the detainment facilities where foreign ISIS fighters and their families are held.

Hussein al-Qaedi, the Yazidi Director of the Office for Kidnapped Affairs, is calling for permission from the central government to conduct DNA testing inside the detainment facilities where foreign ISIS fighters and their families are held. (Fox News/Hollie McKay)

The tight-knit Yazidi faith, which prohibits interfaith marriage and conversion into the religion, is also grappling with integrating babies conceived-out-of-rape to ISIS fathers. Community leaders have called for the infants to be embraced, but the notion is a strange and unsettling one for the ethnicity who have long lived reserved lives dotted across quiet farmlands.

It’s unclear exactly how many babies have been born from the tragedy, but official estimates hover between 100-200. While Yazidi’s religious authorities have announced that they will subvert their ancient traditions and accept the babies as Yazidis, the matter is further complicated by Baghdad’s law that children must take the paternal religion.

It’s a decree many hope will be formally changed.

As it stands now, most Yazidis live in tattered tents in displacement camps, and in ravished and abandoned dwellings across the Nineveh Plains. Funds are fast falling, and the despair is searing.

“Infrastructure is disintegrating. Public washrooms need to be renovated. There is an ongoing lack of electricity and water in the camp and in local areas. Some Yazidis are still struggling for food,” Lisa Miara, Founder of Springs of Hope Foundation Inc., lamented. “Some women suffer from a kind of Stockholm Syndrome and (want to) return to their captors. There are still women being held as ISIS wives.”

Speckhard also noted that the trauma for some Yazidi women runs so deep that they are known to “re-enact their rape,” which she referred to as “pseudo-seizures.”

“The young girl woke up out of it tearful and disorientated,” Speckhard said of one case. “Her sisters say it is the reason they avoid talking about ISIS and their rape experiences, to avoid triggering one of these seizures and that it happens multiple times a day to their sister.”

In this March 15, 2019 file photo, Iraqi Yazidi women mourn during the exhumation process of a mass grave in Iraq's northwestern region of Sinjar. In this March 15, 2019 file photo, Iraqi Yazidi women mourn during the exhumation process of a mass grave in Iraq's northwestern region of Sinjar. (AP)

Shatha and her family are among the tens of thousands left languishing in a displacement camp on the outskirts of the Kurdish city of Duhok. They have little in the way of help when it comes to gluing together what is left of their lives, but she said her camp – called Rwanga – at least has prefabricated caravans.

Many other camps are stuffed with tethered tents from 2014, and she wants to see that small but pivotal improvement.

“Yazidis need not only boxes of food; we need a guarantee that we can survive. We can’t spend our whole lives in camps. We want to go home. But we cannot go home without security,” Shatha underscored. “There is still a lot of armed conflict and illegal groups there. If we can feel safe, we can start rebuilding our areas.”

Safety, for now, feels something of an illusion. The black flags of ISIS still wave in the shadows.

“Insurgent-style attacks by ISIS still happen regularly, with some of those attacks targeted specifically at Yazidis. The Yazidi community knows these realities,” said Ian Bradbury, CEO of 1st NAEF, a non-profit focused on humanitarian aid and assisting victims of all gender-based violence. “After 5 years, there is little hope of a return to any semblance of their former lives living off the mountain and the valley lands around Sinjar.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Germany; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Syria
KEYWORDS: muslimrape; rop
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Kazan
re: Afghanistan. It never made sense. We were at fault for letting Saudis illegally stay in the US. It would've made more sense to be more careful about who was in the US than to get involved in Afghanistan.

Now, why not let the Taliban have it? We're supporting a corrupt gov and paying off lots of people to be our friends. I care less about them than innocent victims of our warmongering ways.

21 posted on 09/14/2019 11:23:46 AM PDT by grania ("We're all just pawns in their game")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: grania
Huh? We had to go to Afghanistan after 9/11. Who in their right mind would think that we didn't need to bring those responsible for 9/11 to justice?

We WON the war in Afghanistan long ago -- we removed the Taliban from power, installed a US friendly government, killed Osama Bin Laden and killed or arrested most of the Al Qaeda leadership responsible for 9/11.

We remain there as we should to have a base operation against Islamic terroris, which paid off today as we killed Bin Laden's son. Great news.

Ignoring Islamic terrorist groups like Bill Clinton did will simply lead to another 9/11. It's utterly moronic idea and certainly not what Donald Trump ran on.

If leave Afghanistan, the same thing will happened that happened in Iraq -- Al Qaeda and Taliban will takeover and start plotting acts of terrorism against the US and we'll have to go back and destroy them all over again.

22 posted on 09/14/2019 11:32:17 AM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kazan
No, we didn't have to go into Afghanistan. We had to keep Saudis out of the US. Keep in mind Obama was hiding out in Pakistan, a country we were allied with.

Our foreign policy is so messed up.

23 posted on 09/14/2019 11:39:38 AM PDT by grania ("We're all just pawns in their game")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: grania
What? We're supposed to ignore what happened on 9/11? Do you have Alzheimer's? The Taliban was protecting Bin Laden and Al Qaeda.

It was absolutely essential to our national that we destroyed Al Qaeda.

You're literally backing Bill Clinton's foreign policy of ignoring Islamic terrorism. Talk about pre-9/11 mentality

24 posted on 09/14/2019 12:13:19 PM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

I’m not ignoring 911. I’m remembering that it was Saudi nationals who performed the attack and that Obama was a Saudi. We’ve destabilized a lot of Mideast countries that kept radicals in line and we’ve made a whole lot of enemies. And still, Saudi Arabia is never held accountable for anything.


25 posted on 09/14/2019 12:37:19 PM PDT by grania ("We're all just pawns in their game")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: grania
We've never destabilized Saudi Arabia. In fact, we protected it from Saddam. Yet, Bin Laden still hated us from entering Saudi.

There is no appeasing Islamic radicals. Fundamentalist Muslims hate anything that isn't Muslim and have sought to conquer the world since the inception of Islam.

26 posted on 09/14/2019 3:03:55 PM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: grania
Obama was a Saudi

Now that is a new one. An agent of the Islamacist and anti-western members of the ruling family , yes. That grotesquely fat Prince Tawil got him into Harvard Law and paid his fees. But BHO a Saudi, that is new.

27 posted on 09/14/2019 4:05:00 PM PDT by robowombat (Orthodox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

I never said we destabilized Saudi Arabia. We destabilized all of their enemies. I don’t see Israel as their enemy; both countries benefit from our regime change choices.


28 posted on 09/14/2019 4:20:45 PM PDT by grania ("We're all just pawns in their game")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kazan; All
Yes, that is the corollary to reducing radically the global footprint of the United States. To do so would mean some rather unpleasant events would take place in a number of countries. To embrace a continental-nationalist foreign and defense policy would also require the United states to be will to act with real ruthless dispatch against any international actor that is a real threat to the nation or who perpetrates any attack on the US. Such a policy would also require a really powerful US military establishment that would be configured to stand guard over the US sphere. Admiral Mahan posited before 1914 that this was North America, the Caribbean and Central America and South America to a line from the mouth of the Amazon straight across to the Pacific. In the pacific the line stretches from the tip of the Seward Peninsula of Alaska south to the Hawaiian Islands and then south to the junction with the South America boundary. He also included Guam and the Philippines as US possessions but not vital to the US. I would include Guam and the North Marianas and a several hundred mile circle around them and Midway and Wake Islands and Johnston Island a thousand miles south of Hawaii. A US heavily armed with its military focuses on being professional military people, not managers, or the Salvation Army with guns or ‘nation builders’ behind the hedge of two wide oceans and, something Admiral Mahan did not figure into, the absolute strongest power in the exo-atmosphere and Outer Space is a not unappealing thought. It will never come to this as there are too many interests tied into our current globalist system. Too bad, in my opinion. The USA should not be the world's peace keeper. The turmoil and uproar in much of the world is of the ‘woes of less happy and lesser lands’, not ours.
29 posted on 09/14/2019 4:23:52 PM PDT by robowombat (Orthodox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
The USA should not be the world's peace keeper.

The US should and had been under great Presidents like Reagan promote freedom, capitalism and human rights and remain the shining city on the hill Reagan referenced.

That doesn't mean using our military to accomplish that but it does mean using our influence to promote all those things. That is truly one of the things that made us the greatest nation on earth and, oddly, it was something both the left and right agreed with.

30 posted on 09/14/2019 10:23:52 PM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Kazan
Your first sentence makes me ill. I am not being wise. The whole Wilsonian, collective security and ‘make the world safe for democracy’ mindset is toxic to real US national interests. Ronald Reagan did effectively marshal this sort of propagandistic smoke screen, But the Cold War was fought against communism, not to spread what certain Americans believe is ‘the Democratic way’ around the world. Iraq and Afghanistan are both great examples of what comes from attempting to be a global nanny and hall monitor in what amounts to Bedford-Stuy. The hall monitor gets mugged, at the least. Throughout the world there are cultures that have developed over millennia in very idiosyncratic ways. Trying to turn Baghdad or Kabul or Lima or Cairo, for that matter into Des Moines is both the height of hubris and grossly offensive to the ‘others’ no matter what we think about their social orders. In other words , unless there is a real threat to vital US interests let the foreigners settle their differences in their way. Homo Sapient have been screwed up in different ways since we were running about on the Savannah. They always will be. Leave the foreigners to their own devices , unless they live within what is our sphere of interest. Then let them be as screwed up as they choose as long as they do what we want.

The logical consequence of American universalism is what we have today. The Marine Corps and Army have become the tools of foreign policy in places we have no on going interests and the US southern border continues to be porous and only if DJT gets another term will we be kept from becoming North Mexico. Normal Americans who join the military to defend our country get to go to some sewer such as Iraq to engage in ‘nation building’ while the locals devote themselves to fanaticism and trying to kill as many Americans as possible while the political elites connive at letting hordes of illegals into help them subvert what America was supposed to be. A country where if you obeyed the law you were pretty much free to pursue your life , well sort of anyway. People such as the Bush family constantly intones this sanctimonious BS (read GWB’s Second Inaugural Address for a pitch perfect rendition of this poisonous nonsense).

Finally the rhetorical device of the ‘shining city on a hill’ trope meant exactly the opposite from what the Puritans such as John Winthrop meant by it. The Puritans saw themselves as the ‘elect’ who strove for ‘purity’. They came from England to get away from all the ‘impure’ people . They looked upon their towns as little shining centers of righteousness and wanted no part of the ‘impure’ rabble to pollute their holy presences. In other words the Puritans wanted nothing to do with anyone else. They proved to their own satisfaction that the Indians, who certainly were there first, were Satan's imps. I really wish American political tub thumpers would cease using that platitude. But it is great sucker bait, so they never will.

31 posted on 09/15/2019 1:15:25 AM PDT by robowombat (Orthodox)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson