Why does cnn et. al. not show debates between TRUE BELIEVERS and those scientists who think it is untrue?
Anthropogenic climate change is so insignificant it’s barely a single grain of sand on a mile long Florida beach. But it is there. .0038% of the Earths total atmosphere, Man is responsible for. That amount is also not a considerable climate challenging composition either.
To the fake news left, real science is just a liberal a a-hole in a white lab coat.
Bill Nye is an uneducated, latter day Capt. Kangaroo, but put him on TV in a white lab coat and vwa-la’ “ Scientist”
It’s far from a hoax. It’s a strategy to form a global government.
<< It is the second most staggering fraud ever perpetrated upon the American people after the media’s promotion of the unstoppable candidacy of Beto >>
It’s first by a wide margin. Russia/collusion might be second. The short-lived promotion of the loser Beto doesn’t even warrant a mention.
Propagation of Error and the Reliability of Global Air Temperature Projections, Mark II
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3777424/posts
If we removed the push to solve the fake climate change crisis, the identity politics, and the liberal agenda from the news, what would they even have left to “report” on?
He shoots, he scores. Kurt puts the biscuit in the basket and breaks the hockey stick.
Kurt nails it again.
Yes but the climate alarmists claim the science is complete and the consensus is that we are destroying the planet. Never mind that (1) consensus is politics, not science and (2) almost all conclusions are based on computer models, and I don't believe we have yet programmed a model that accurately predicts such a complicated thing such as our climate.
They are apostate. When will the Democrats start a Bonfire of the Vanities?
Leftists forever drone on about “science” and how CC is “proven” by same.
But they can’t admit the obvious science and common sense that there are ONLY 2 sexes and they cannot be changed.
The current focus on Carbon Dioxide is worse than a hoax. It takes the focus away from real pollution that we should be addressing.
There is a Princeton Physics professor that has a youtube video called “Dearth of Carbon Dixoide”. He makes the case that more carbon dioxide in the air will not result in very much warming and that we are at historic lows of carbon dioxide in the air.
Real science tells us that there are two sexes.
Real science tells us that the earth has been warmer than it is now.
Real science tells us that the next ice age is overdue.
If you want something to prepare for, prepare for that.
Adding:
If it was really a hoax, would it be taught as science to and entire generation of K-12 and Bachelor’s Master’s and Phd’s at the University level?
If it was really a hoax, would the U.N. devote significant resources to develop a strategy to fight it?
If it really was a hoax, would the government be providing funding grants at the University and non-profit foundation levels to study it?
If it really were a hoax, would there be an entire financial market dedicated to a method of restricting harmful greenhouse gas emissions.
If it really were a hoax, would our nation and other nations enact laws to change over from fossil fuels to Solar and windmills?
If it really were a hoax, would Megan and Harry fly commercial instead of private?
” When you say “climate change is a grift,” and you should as often as possible, you are pointing out that this green-on-the-outside/red-on-the-inside fake frenzy is really just a set of intertwined grifts transparently designed to separate you from your freedom and your property in the name of somehow adjusting the weather.”
Right on the money. I’ve posted this before but the documentary ‘The great global warming swindle’ is an excellent video that details this subject A to Z. It’s a little dated but if anything the examples are even more true today. It’s free to watch on youtube. It ties communism’s fall from power to the rise of this issue as a replacement. The left’s similarity to tyranny is no coincidence.
Dr. David Dilley's observations and conclusions
Professor Valentina Zharkova Breaks Her Silence and CONFIRMS “Super” Grand Solar Minimum
enjoy
No doubt this is Anthropogenic Total Solar Gauss Lowering
7
All the climate change advocates are global warming deniers....