Skip to comments.
California’s Newsom signs bill allowing citizens to refuse to help a police officer
Fox News ^
| September 04 2019
| Edmund DeMarche
Posted on 09/04/2019 4:29:08 AM PDT by knighthawk
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
To: knighthawk
“The Sacramento Bee reported that the old law, the California Posse Comitatus Act of 1872...”
Isn’t the Sacramento Bee the satire site?
Did Fox get out-foxed?
2
posted on
09/04/2019 4:35:24 AM PDT
by
moovova
To: knighthawk
The Snitches Get Stitches law?
3
posted on
09/04/2019 4:38:09 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
To: moovova
The Sacramento Bee is legitimate. You’re thinking of the Babylon Bee - that’s the satire site.
4
posted on
09/04/2019 4:38:35 AM PDT
by
2nd amendment mama
(Self Defense is a Basic Human Right!)
To: moovova
Babylon Bee is the satire site. SackOfBS is the one that sometimes prints fake news.
5
posted on
09/04/2019 4:38:56 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
To: knighthawk
...The Sacramento Bee reported that the old law, the California Posse Comitatus Act of 1872, was common in the countrys early days, but Sen. Bob Hertzberg, a Los Angeles Democrat who sponsored the bill, called the old law a vestige of a bygone era." The law was employed to help catch runaway slaves, the report said... Since slavery officially ended in the US in 1865, it is difficult for me to understand how any law passed in 1872 could have been used to catch runaway slaves.
Bob, it is time for you to go back to history class before you put your foot further into your mouth.
6
posted on
09/04/2019 4:41:41 AM PDT
by
CurlyDave
To: knighthawk
A law passed after slavery ended was created to catch runaway slaves? I dont think so. Just another identity politics throw away line.
I do agree with eliminating this law though. A very anti-individual law.
7
posted on
09/04/2019 4:42:38 AM PDT
by
Codeflier
(Tagline for sale.)
To: moovova
I used to live in California but I never heard of that law.
Nonetheless, I helped two Police Officers fight a group of suspects in the L.A. Bus station years ago. We won.
8
posted on
09/04/2019 4:45:42 AM PDT
by
Chainmail
(Remember that half the people you meet are below average intelligence)
To: 2nd amendment mama
The Sacramento Bee was where one of Mike Nifong’s media co-conspirators was given refuge. The Babylon Bee is more believable.
9
posted on
09/04/2019 4:47:02 AM PDT
by
MrEdd
(Caveat Emptor)
To: knighthawk
California continues on its quest to become the most dangerous state in the union.
10
posted on
09/04/2019 4:47:23 AM PDT
by
cld51860
(Volo pro veritas)
To: CurlyDave
Slavery was never a big issue in California either.
11
posted on
09/04/2019 4:49:58 AM PDT
by
Lurkina.n.Learnin
(If you want a definition of "bullying" just watch the Democrats in the Senate)
To: CurlyDave
Since slavery officially ended in the US in 1865, it is difficult for me to understand how any law passed in 1872 could have been used to catch runaway slaves.
...
This bill is political theater by the Democrats, so why not add a lie to it.
12
posted on
09/04/2019 4:51:38 AM PDT
by
Moonman62
(Charity comes from wealth.)
To: knighthawk
So the commie is trying to further divide other residents from police. Bad policy, IMO.
13
posted on
09/04/2019 4:53:29 AM PDT
by
familyop
("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
To: knighthawk
If there is no law, there is no law
That leaves the governor vulnerable when he is out on the street
14
posted on
09/04/2019 4:55:24 AM PDT
by
bert
( (KE. NP. N.btyC. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
To: CurlyDave
Since slavery officially ended in the US in 1865, it is difficult for me to understand how any law passed in 1872 could have been used to catch runaway slaves.
—
Narrative is more important than facts. Slavery bad. Law to help catch slaves bad (even if law was passed *after* emancipation... they know most won’t know history). Ergo, law must go.
15
posted on
09/04/2019 4:58:51 AM PDT
by
Flick Lives
(MSM, the Enemy of the People since 1898)
To: Flick Lives
Narrative is more important than facts.
You have just summed up the Decline and Fall of Western Civilization.
16
posted on
09/04/2019 5:04:02 AM PDT
by
samtheman
(The drive-by media is the true boss of the democommie party.)
To: Moonman62
17
posted on
09/04/2019 5:04:03 AM PDT
by
KSCITYBOY
(The media is corrupt)
To: knighthawk
Sheeeeyit. What a smokescreen. This law was was passed so Newsom FredocRATS in the CA legislature could tack on and funnel tens of millions of dollars in unrelated spending to themselves and their cronies.
18
posted on
09/04/2019 5:06:40 AM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: knighthawk
“Allowing”???
Don’t you just LOVE it when a PUBLIC SERVANT tells his Masters what they’re “allowed” and “not allowed” to do?
19
posted on
09/04/2019 5:07:42 AM PDT
by
NFHale
(The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
To: knighthawk
IF perchance I’m passing thru a staunch communist, anti-gun state like CA, they won’t have to worry too much about me stopping & helping one of their gestapo-style LEOs...law or no law.
20
posted on
09/04/2019 5:08:46 AM PDT
by
lgjhn23
(It's easy to be liberal when you're dumber than a box of rocks.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson