Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/01/2019 11:11:32 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: knighthawk

I’ll crawl over broken glass to write in Donald Trump’s name.


2 posted on 09/01/2019 11:17:17 PM PDT by Lurkina.n.Learnin (If you want a definition of "bullying" just watch the Democrats in the Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Of course triggering a substantial drop in Republican turnout for the 2020 primary/general elections was a desired (by the DemocRATS) outcome of this devious bit of chicanery. Satan never sleeps.


3 posted on 09/01/2019 11:17:40 PM PDT by House Atreides (Boycott the NFL 100% — PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

It will be ruled unconstitutional in a few months.


5 posted on 09/01/2019 11:31:25 PM PDT by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BB0ndRzaz2o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Needs to be struck down by courts immediately.

And what about its applicability if any towards write in candidates?


6 posted on 09/01/2019 11:38:54 PM PDT by SteveH (intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

What is the downside to Trump withdrawing from California for 2020?

The upside may be that him not running in such a big state would finally be an event that may force the media to acknowledge that the “national popular vote” is a completely fictional number made up by accumulating unrelated separate vote totals from the 50 states plus DC.

How could they even report on a popular vote winner or lose if Trump takes himself out of the most populous state?

If there is no significant downside, maybe that is what he should do!


7 posted on 09/01/2019 11:56:07 PM PDT by zencycler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Why not apply this requirement of every candidate in every race?


8 posted on 09/01/2019 11:59:09 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Federal Election....Federal Laws. We went through that with Florida.

Tax returns not required.

13 posted on 09/02/2019 3:52:08 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

It’s an unconstitutional law and will be shot down in the courts.


14 posted on 09/02/2019 4:49:38 AM PDT by maddog55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

The biggest criminals are those who are passing this law, they have conveniently excluded themselves from it


15 posted on 09/02/2019 5:13:39 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (nicdip.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Poll taxes were intended to keep poor from voting and are illegal.
How is a rule intended to keep qualified candidates off the ballot legal?


16 posted on 09/02/2019 5:38:39 AM PDT by null and void (After those deliberate lies THEY owe it to me to be honest, I don't owe them to be less suspicious.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
I wouldn’t be surprised if a state required shagging an animal before being allowed to be on a ballot.
17 posted on 09/02/2019 5:48:27 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

[[[Republican leaders in the Golden State, however, argue that if the law actually keeps Trump off the March primary ballot, it would all but assure a depressed Republican turnout statewide]]]

The true intent of the legislation.


24 posted on 09/02/2019 7:46:17 AM PDT by headstamp 2 (There's a stairway to heaven, but there's a highway to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

I’m fascinated that a “law” from a state was created to force a candidate to do something previously not against the law to stop the candidate from being elected with forced withdrawal from the privilege of running for office.

Under the XIV amendment within the equal protection clause it states that although one may “have no right” to be elected or appointed to an office, all persons “do have a federal constitutional right to be considered for public service without the burden of invidiously discriminatory disqualification. And since there is no requirement for a person to disclose his/her taxes, this qualifies. The action by the states is unconstitutional. No state can over rule the Constitution.

rwood


26 posted on 09/02/2019 8:21:21 AM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Give us a reason to show up, idiots!!!


27 posted on 09/02/2019 8:39:38 AM PDT by CarmichaelPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

I’m not so worried about this law. The one I’m worried about is, “No candidate who goes by the name ‘Donald Trump’, or any variation thereof, shall appear on the 2020 Presidential Ballot in California. “


30 posted on 09/02/2019 8:56:02 AM PDT by Lazamataz (We can be called a racist and we'll just smile. Because we don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

California Republicans need to use this law against the Rats by proving the dems filed fraudulent tax returns. Should be easy to do since almost every Rat is a crook.


34 posted on 09/02/2019 9:14:44 AM PDT by Auntie Dem (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

I thought Trump was gauche, and would depress turnout?


35 posted on 09/02/2019 9:39:07 AM PDT by gogeo (The left prides themselves on being tolerant, but they can't even be civil.z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Tell me again, how many electoral votes did Trump get from California in 2016?


39 posted on 09/02/2019 1:08:55 PM PDT by Chuckster (Probably not...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson