Posted on 09/01/2019 9:12:31 AM PDT by RummyChick
Two directors of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's foundation have quit their roles, including a former advisor to Hilary Clinton, documents reveal.
Harry and Meghan have lost a string of workers, including private securities, a bodyguard, personal assistant and nannies to baby Archie.
But now official records show head of communications Sara Latham and director Natalie Campbell resigned just 53 days into their posts at Sussex Royal.
Companies House documents show both workers, two of Meghan's so-called 'wise women' left their posts with the charitable foundation on August 22.
Buckingham Palace has refused to comment on the resignations, but a royal source claims the pair were only given director status temporarily for legal reasons and now they are no longer directors - but still have the same job and remain employed by the Sussexes.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
It is sort of a real life fairy tale. charles truly loved her. Did his duty and married Diana but love overcame all and he ended up with his true love in the end.
And the public has accepted her.
i agree! the family did not approve because Camilla lived a full life and was not a virgin. So...he did not marry her. Big mistake. Diana may have been a certified virgin, but an unstable nutbar as well.
I’m glad that C & c are married now. alot of wasted years ( unless you count the affair!)
well...harry married a certified non virgin who he
supposedly loves and that is turning into a disaster.
hey, you never can tell! maybe he likes being yanked around by his privates.
I remember naturalman1975 saying Charles would “defend the faith”. However its likely he would do it “constitutionally” which probably wouldn’t satisfy a lot of people here. Naturalman1975 claims Charles is “conservative” as many of us understand it, but buys into the environmental gobbledygook.
Naturalman1975 is welcome to join in and deny or confirm what I remembered the Charles discussion.
Agree with your run down.
Harry should have just said no to drugs years ago.
Interesting. Thanks for posting.
The story is that Liz didn’t approve of the non-virginal Camilla.
Yeah, the affair. Diana supposedly wanted to call off the wedding in the last hours because of the affair. Guess that mess is why Liz backed off putting her foot down with ME-ghan though she should have. William and Kate didn’t approve but Wills had no power to put a stop to it.
Plus she’s a Trump-hater.
Some of these ex nannies are going to start writing books about their personal experience as an employee of the Duchess. They will likely be offered high dollar advances.
No, it will be abolished eventually by a Labor government in the interests of smashing tradition and expunging all vestiges of the old England.
Meghan’s anchor baby is only a few months old and already they can’t keep nannies, plural? She must be a royal jerk. And I see she doesn’t allow a mere infant to slow down her jetsetting and hobnobbing, gotta press the celebrity status 24/7.
The Prince is a good and decent man - he messed up in some ways when it came to his first marriage - there was fault on both sides there, including his own. But that was decades ago now, and he's not even the same man he was then.
Over all, the Prince is a conservative on most political issues. He would fit it quite well here at Freerepublic. An exception to that is his environmentalism which certainly is real, but he's been an environmentalist since before it was completely captured by the left. I've had a number of arguments with him over this, but honestly, he really is very well informed, and I tend to come away from those discussions having been more turned to his side of the argument than the opposite. But, yes, he's definitely an environmentalist - the one major issue he agrees with the left wing media on which is why they constantly present his advocacy of it. They don't cover anywhere near as much the other things he does, many of which take up much more of his time - he support for the military and veterans for example - or the fact that he's one of the few world leaders who has spoken out publically and clearly about the oppression of Christians in the Middle East - have you heard about his speeches on that? There's a decent chance you haven't because they don't get much publicity.
Would he 'Defend the Faith?' Yes, he would. He already does. And the Prince is a devout Christian - here, I need to be a little careful, because it's very important I don't come across as speaking for him or breaking any confidences, but my feeling is that the Prince is closer to the Greek Orthodox faith of his father's family (Prince Phillip was born a Prince of Greece and Denmark), that he is to the Church of England, of which he is bound to become Supreme Governor when he becomes King - the Prince has Orthodox imagery in his own home, and has visited a Greek Orthodox monastery on a number of occasions - again, this isn't a secret, but it doesn't get a lot of publicity, the media rarely mentions it. The Prince may have to deal with the reality that he has a constitutional role within England to be the Head of the Church of England some day, so he is not really free to convert formally to another Christian denomination as another might, but his faith is very real and devout, Christian at its core. I would add that I'm not sure he's always had this depth of faith - my personal impression is that in his younger days, he was less religious than he is now, although I didn't know him as well back then (technically we both met as schoolboys but I've only come to be somebody I could call a genuine friend over a little more than the last decade) so it's hard for me to judge that for certain.
Despite what some people sometimes try to claim, the Prince has no real connection to Islam in any sense. He treats Islam with respect and some might regard as a mistake, but again, people need to bear in mind, that he will be head of a Commonwealth of Nations that includes tens of millions of Muslims, including the world's second and third most populous Islamic countries. There are also millions of Muslims living in his own country, who he will be King of and for. So he does treat them with respect. He despises terrorism in any form - but it should be remembered, I think, that his closest personal experience of terrorism was the murder of his mentor, Lord Mountbatten, at the hands of people who claimed to be (utterly falsely, but it was their claim) Roman Catholic - he knows the impact of sectarian violence and terrorism intimately in a way that most people don't, and he separates the acts of religious terrorism from the acts of people who simply wish to lead a religious life. He does not adhere to anything Islamic - people like sharing photos of him sometimes in Middle Eastern garb, but what they do not seem to realise is that when he wore that it was as a diplomatic function - for centuries, Princes have worn the uniforms and traditional dress of other nations they are visiting on occasion, as parts of formal exchanges of dignity.
The Prince isn't a perfect man - but he's spent his entire life being raised and trained to do his duty by his country and the Commonwealth. When he becomes King, he will do his best and I think he'll do it well.
and there you have the definitive answer or as definitive you can likely get it!
Thanks naturalman1975!
I thought they wanted to move to the continent of Africa. No country named...
Prince Charles is England’s “Al Gore”, a pox be upon his name.
He could have been a contender.
I have a question for you ..not to answer as a friend of Charles but your general knowledge of Royals.
What is the deal with this mess with Meghan. Do they try to straighten her up or just let harry and meghan drift to the Malibu wind. It seems the Queen could put her royal foot down if she wanted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.