Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Su-57 has finer craftsmanship; weapons bay needs improvement
Global Times via Global Security ^ | 2019/8/29 17:03:40 | Liu Xuanzun

Posted on 08/30/2019 7:04:28 AM PDT by robowombat

Su-57 has finer craftsmanship; weapons bay needs improvement

Global Times

By Liu Xuanzun in Moscow Source:Global Times Published: 2019/8/29 17:03:40

The craftsmanship of the Su-57, believed to be Russia's best fighter jet, is finer than expected but small details, such as the weapons bay door, appear to require improvement, a Global Times reporter observed.

The aircraft was exhibited for the first time on the ground on Tuesday, the opening day of 2019 International Aviation and Space Salon (MAKS) in Zhukovsky, near Moscow, just behind the rostrum where Russian President Vladimir Putin and his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdogan held the opening ceremony to the event.

The fighter jet has been seen in videos and photos, but up close the craftsmanship of the fuselage was actually finer than expected from a Russian aircraft, as the texture of its skin looked smooth despite the rivets.

This impression was enhanced when the Su-57 was moved away from the rostrum to the static display ground on Wednesday, where it was exhibited next to the Su-35 and Su-30.

However, the weapons bay door did not seem to fit together perfectly when closed, which could have an impact on flight performance and stealth capability, analysts said.

The air intakes were blocked at the display so nothing could be seen inside the engines.

The Su-57 is one of the most attractive items at MAKS 2019.

Dubbed the Su-57E, the exhibited Su-57 is available for export, as countries including Turkey and India are among potential buyers, according to media reports.

Russia has offered China the aircraft, foreign media reported, and there is no report on a Chinese response.

Some Chinese analysts said that China already operates its own stealth fighter jet, the J-20, while the stealth capability of the Su-57 remains questionable, so there is no need for China to make a purchase.

Others said that there are still a lot of innovative concepts and advanced technologies used on the Su-57 like the directional infrared countermeasures system and the engines.

A military expert who asked not to be named told the Global Times that China should conduct performance comparison tests between the Russian and Chinese aircraft under real combat scenarios, which would give China a better understanding of the Su-57's true capabilities, before the country decides whether a purchase is worthwhile.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 08/30/2019 7:04:28 AM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

ping


2 posted on 08/30/2019 7:05:54 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

TTIUWOP


3 posted on 08/30/2019 7:11:22 AM PDT by Fido969 (In!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Worthless without pictures ...

Russia needs to sell these as an export item. Currently 12 in use (2018) in Russia / Syria.

4 posted on 08/30/2019 7:14:30 AM PDT by SES1066 (Happiness is a depressed Washington, DC housing market!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fido969

No photos at the source, go figure...


5 posted on 08/30/2019 7:16:16 AM PDT by null and void (Heaven has an impenetrable wall, and a welcoming gate for those qualified, Hell is wide open.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SES1066

Yeah! Friday morning aircraft porn!


6 posted on 08/30/2019 7:19:37 AM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (Elitist Liberals have no idea the hunger and strength of the beast they have uncaged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SES1066

What is that pimple at the pilots 12:00?


7 posted on 08/30/2019 7:20:00 AM PDT by 9422WMR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 9422WMR

Just a guess, but FLIR pod maybe?

CC


8 posted on 08/30/2019 7:24:24 AM PDT by Celtic Conservative (My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Conservative

Seems like they could have made it a bit more aerodynamic!
Looks like a bubblegum cop light off Sheriff Taylor’s car!


9 posted on 08/30/2019 7:27:02 AM PDT by 9422WMR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 9422WMR

Infrared sensor


10 posted on 08/30/2019 7:28:00 AM PDT by Trumpocrat (Lib Fairytale "All peoples have equal talent. Whites [ or Chinese etc] hold the others down.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SES1066

You know the engines are running good when the afterburners are that nice clear blue color.


11 posted on 08/30/2019 7:32:33 AM PDT by dynoman (Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Looks like the Ruskies stole this design.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_YF-23


12 posted on 08/30/2019 7:36:04 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Democracy, two Wolves and one Sheep deciding what's for Dinner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trumpocrat

What is an IR sensor for? Inbound missiles or aircraft or ?


13 posted on 08/30/2019 7:36:09 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Epstein proves it's all a charade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SES1066

The aircraft is superior to f-35 apart from canopy frame and rear-aspect stealth. It is closer to f-22 than to to f-35 but L&M would pay for any news stating differently because it would hurt their sales.


14 posted on 08/30/2019 7:43:15 AM PDT by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

This looks like a great modern aircraft. It would be bad if China bought these.


15 posted on 08/30/2019 7:44:01 AM PDT by PilotDave (No, really, you just can't make this stuff up!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

If you will research Yak-141 you’d learn that f-35 was a Russian design. Refined by Lokheed Martin no doubt.


16 posted on 08/30/2019 7:46:16 AM PDT by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: PilotDave

Imagine China’s reaction if Russia sold some to India.


17 posted on 08/30/2019 7:49:40 AM PDT by utahb52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: utahb52

India sucks in this case. It failed to finance Sukhoi development extorting kickbacks in exchange. Turkey and China would be primary non-Russian users.


18 posted on 08/30/2019 7:57:37 AM PDT by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SES1066

Interesting spurs at the corners of the wings. Are they supposed to work like the upturned winglets on commercial planes?


19 posted on 08/30/2019 8:27:31 AM PDT by VanShuyten (Er"...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
Su-57 has finer craftsmanship...

Hmm... One does not usually associate fine craftsmanship with anything Russian. I mean where are all those Zils?!

20 posted on 08/30/2019 8:44:20 AM PDT by Rummyfan (In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man. Support Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson