Skip to comments.
DOJ Takes a Stand: Sex Is Purely Biological, Civil Rights Act Doesn't Protect Transgenders
The Western Journal ^
Posted on 08/27/2019 6:54:30 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
BOOM!
A real boom too, not like a BOMBSHELL.
2
posted on
08/27/2019 6:59:59 PM PDT
by
chris37
(Monday, March 25 2019 is Maga Day!)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
This is breaking news, assuming the headline is true.
3
posted on
08/27/2019 7:01:55 PM PDT
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Oh my, the Libtards are going to lose their minds on this one.
Yes, I agree (to some extent) that gender is a social construct--which means that if enough fools decide that there are 57 genders then that becomes part of the culture.
But biology is empirical. No DNA test will tell you that if someone is "gender fluid and queer." And surgically mutilating your genitalia does not change your DNA. And the reason that we have women's sports is because of biology. (Besides, if there are 57 genders for athletic purposes, how does one find enough competitors for Gender #45?)
4
posted on
08/27/2019 7:02:29 PM PDT
by
Lysandru
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Wait until Buzzie is replaced before allowing it to get to the USSC.
5
posted on
08/27/2019 7:02:40 PM PDT
by
Rebelbase
To: E. Pluribus Unum
6
posted on
08/27/2019 7:04:57 PM PDT
by
MrEdd
(Caveat Emptor)
To: Mariner
7
posted on
08/27/2019 7:07:42 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
("If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.")
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Law.com reported that the EEOC did not sign on to the Trump DOJs brief appealing that ruling to the Supreme Court last week, indicating the agency does not support the administrations position. Some people at the EEOC need to be fired.
Great article thanks for posting.
8
posted on
08/27/2019 7:09:49 PM PDT
by
Pontiac
(The welfare state must fail because it is contrary to human nature and diminishes the human spirit)
To: chris37
LOL
Yeah this is REAL.
Sick of reading all this sh.t about 32 genders and freaks in dresses.
If you wanna do that at home, that’s your business.
I mean, I do it like twice a week but i have a hard time finding big enough skirt...
No wait. Forget all that.
9
posted on
08/27/2019 7:17:27 PM PDT
by
dp0622
(Bad, bad company PeoTill the day I die.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
OK. This is expected behavior by the DoJ as far as I am concerned. They get a C.
The fact that some view this as some great achievement or position shows how far we have slipped as a country.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Yup, even though the designs for this car look exactly like a AMC Gremlin, the car has declared that it’s a Lexus.
And, EVERY liberal judge in the land thinks the damned POS is a Lexus.
11
posted on
08/27/2019 7:22:26 PM PDT
by
Da Coyote
(eh)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Translation: the mentally ill dont get to boss us around.
12
posted on
08/27/2019 7:23:07 PM PDT
by
samtheman
(The drive-by media is the true boss of the democommie party.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Leftist activists expect us to yield. They must be denied and ridiculed. Remember that “transgender” is only removed from trans-dragon by a matter of degree the latter also involves some prosthesis and a bit of reconstruction, adding to that a fuel supply and ignition source.
13
posted on
08/27/2019 7:27:03 PM PDT
by
jimfree
(My19 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
To: Lysandru
There’s going to be a LOT of filled adult diapers on Twitter...
14
posted on
08/27/2019 7:38:08 PM PDT
by
kiryandil
(The Media & the DNC tells you who you're gonna vote for. We CHOSE Trump.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Does declaring oneself a transgender woman cure prostate cancer?
Is this individual now vulnerable to ovarian cancer?
Natural Law is not to be mocked.
15
posted on
08/27/2019 7:40:21 PM PDT
by
gasport
(The dung beetle should be the symbol of the Democrat Party)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
Only stating what the law has always been.
Congress repeatedly and uniformly refused over many years to extend the civil rights laws to homosexuals, let alone gender confused people.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
If, as a matter of law, anyone can be a woman, then no one is a woman, and sex-based protections in the law have no meaning whatsoever. Some people get it.
To: E. Pluribus Unum; LucyT
18
posted on
08/27/2019 7:47:09 PM PDT
by
Brown Deer
(America First!)
To: Pontiac
EEOCEventual Elimination Of Caucasians
19
posted on
08/27/2019 7:48:58 PM PDT
by
Roccus
(When you talk to a politician...ANY politician...always say, "Remember Ceausescu")
To: Enterprise; E. Pluribus Unum
If, as a matter of law, anyone can be a woman, then no one is a woman, and sex-based protections in the law have no meaning whatsoever.Some people get it.
Was thinking of someone who said she wanted Harris to be POTUS "because it's time we had a woman in the office." Well, if anyone can claim to be a woman, her campaign has been rendered meaningless, no?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-82 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson