1 posted on
08/13/2019 4:11:53 PM PDT by
Kaslin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: Kaslin
I hope BK rips them to shreds
2 posted on
08/13/2019 4:14:57 PM PDT by
Popman
To: Kaslin
All senators from one party states. This is what’s in store for all of us.
3 posted on
08/13/2019 4:17:03 PM PDT by
Williams
(Stop Tolerating The Intolerant.)
To: Kaslin
The Dems have Roberts in their back pocket..don’t forget that..
4 posted on
08/13/2019 4:18:04 PM PDT by
SGCOS
To: Kaslin
WTH do the Democrat senators have to be happy? They are STILL reacting to losing the elections: The one they lost in 2016 and the one they WILL lose in 2020
5 posted on
08/13/2019 4:18:32 PM PDT by
madison10
To: Kaslin
6 posted on
08/13/2019 4:20:02 PM PDT by
Nifster
(I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
To: Kaslin
No city,county or state should be allowed to regulate firearm ownership. Only the United States Congress should be allowed to do that.And once any such legislation comes out of DC its constitutionality is determined in the Federal courts.
8 posted on
08/13/2019 4:22:14 PM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(A joke: Brennan,Comey and Lynch walk into a Barr...)
To: Kaslin
2a is in the constitution.
Its SETTLED, socialist gun disarmers. For 230+ years.
9 posted on
08/13/2019 4:22:46 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
To: Kaslin
Hoo boy .... where to start ...
You can't "expand" the second amendment. Those words don't make sense.
The second amendment IS .... period, and it is an all encompassing IS at that !
10 posted on
08/13/2019 4:24:37 PM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true, I have no proof, but they're true.)
To: Kaslin
The Supreme Court is not well. And the people know it. Perhaps the Court can heal itself before the public demands it be restructured I do not see "the public" making demands.
I do see a handfull of proglibs making barely veiled threats.
The fools are sooo close to the edge.
.
13 posted on
08/13/2019 4:40:04 PM PDT by
TLI
( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
To: Kaslin
All Democrats in Congress are Statists and they hate that the Supreme Court even occasionally slaps their hands. Leftists want to crush all dissent, whether it be at a college campus, the Supreme Court or anywhere else in this country.
14 posted on
08/13/2019 4:42:21 PM PDT by
Repeal 16-17
(Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
To: Kaslin
There is no doubt in my conservative brain that the 2nd Amendment addresses both the states and individuals. Anyone who see’s it otherwise pisses on the Constitution. 4 judges are at the urinal. Will Roberts join them?
16 posted on
08/13/2019 4:50:27 PM PDT by
Starstruck
(I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
To: Kaslin
“Anyone who tries to tell you the Court doesn’t have activist judges is straight up lying. “
Like Traitor Roberts?
17 posted on
08/13/2019 4:59:33 PM PDT by
Paladin2
To: Kaslin
From the article:
"...the Second Amendment and gun control is a political issue... '
What a pathetic example of the left attempting to "reorganize" our language.
The 2d is the law, not some political opinion. Nonetheless, this leftist interpretation is coming to a town near you and will soon be in the school system, if not already.
18 posted on
08/13/2019 5:01:23 PM PDT by
frog in a pot
(It is a scam to argue our astute Founders intended the weakest of the two possible forms of NBC.)
To: Kaslin
They just want to make a small revision to the Second Amendment, “The Right of the Democrat Party to rewrite the Constitution, shall not be Infringed”.
To: Kaslin
The judiciary was not intended to settle hypothetical disagreements. The Framers designed Article III courts to adjudicate actual controversies brought by plaintiffs who suffer real-world harm. Maybe they can enlighten me on how the State of Hawaii was "real-world harmed" by citizens of foreign countries, still in their home countries, who never before came to the this country, who were going to be denied visas to enter this country, and got a district court to block a President Trump executive order over it.
-PJ
20 posted on
08/13/2019 5:06:55 PM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
To: Kaslin
My understanding is that the defendants have granted the relief sought by the plaintiffs and are now pleading that this renders the case moot.
Is that correct?
21 posted on
08/13/2019 5:08:21 PM PDT by
Jim Noble
(There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
To: Kaslin
Oddly, the quoted SCOTUS case of Obergefill v. Hodges regiens in the lower Circus courts that have been blocking POTUS Trump.
22 posted on
08/13/2019 5:27:09 PM PDT by
Deaf Smith
(When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's fore sure)
To: Kaslin
Oddly, the quoted SCOTUS case of Obergefill v. Hodges regiens in the lower Circus courts that have been blocking POTUS Trump.
23 posted on
08/13/2019 5:30:21 PM PDT by
Deaf Smith
(When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's fore sure)
To: Kaslin
Considering that the wacked-out Democrats double-dawg dared them . . . what else could they do? Maybe if the Dims (they are called dim for a reason) might have sent it back to the lower court.
24 posted on
08/13/2019 5:36:29 PM PDT by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
To: Kaslin
"The Supreme Court is the highest law in the land." Uh, no. It's not anything of the sort.
25 posted on
08/13/2019 5:47:38 PM PDT by
Windflier
(Torches and pitchforks ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson