The mine is more important.
I think I’d rather trust some Sarah Palin response to this issue, rather than CNN
It’s actually not but I’m sure the statement
that the mine would cause “complete loss of” the bay’s fish habitat...
is a lie.
And if it was true the fish habitat would be a serious consideration.
But the EPA has a track record of nonsensical decisions and thus I doubt it would cause “complete loss” of the fish habitat.
CNN has learned.
CNN will never learn.
“...a controversial Alaska mining project that COULD devastate...”
Then later...
“...WOULD devastate...”
Feh.
“that could” Vs. “will”
“will” wins
“that could” goes home ...wanting
“that Could” is BS lying conjecture every time it’s tried.
The EPA is another agency that needs to be gutted.
More winning.
Good.
The mine is more important.
Without your daily feeding of minerals you’d just wither away. Anyway, every one knows that food is made in grocery stores and organic mineral are tastier that organic salmon. < /s >
“Earth first.
We’ll mine the other planets later”
Obama's EPA were the incompetents who poisoned the Animas River in 2015.
A cousin used to fish out of Dillingham. When he complained about the future mine I suggested the fishermen form a group and buy the mineral rights. Crickets.
But what did the brown bears, bears of color) have to say.