Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Innovative

It’s actually not but I’m sure the statement

that the mine would cause “complete loss of” the bay’s fish habitat...

is a lie.

And if it was true the fish habitat would be a serious consideration.

But the EPA has a track record of nonsensical decisions and thus I doubt it would cause “complete loss” of the fish habitat.


3 posted on 08/09/2019 9:41:41 PM PDT by dp0622 (Bad, bad company Till the day I die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dp0622

EPA. The good folks who poisoned the Animas River in Colorado and turned it “Orange Man Bad.”

https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=IVROXa-dLMK3ggfRtJCQBQ&q=epa+poisons+river&oq=epa+poiso&gs_l=psy-ab.1.0.0l2j0i22i30l8.1183.4746..6414...1.0..0.627.2970.2j3j1j0j1j3......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i131j0i3j0i13j0i13i30j0i13i5i30.vrTwpfH6iek


11 posted on 08/09/2019 10:21:44 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Who will think of the gerbils ? Just say no to Buttgiggity !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: dp0622

I caught that too. Bull squat “would”.


21 posted on 08/09/2019 11:07:27 PM PDT by vpintheak (Stop making stupid people famous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: dp0622
It’s actually not but I’m sure the statement

that the mine would cause “complete loss of” the bay’s fish habitat...

is a lie.


Actually it isn't a lie - effluent from the mine flowing down the rivers would kill most of the returning salmon and even if some manage to spawn the eggs would be poisoned and any surviving smolts would die. It would be the end of the largest salmon run in the world, not to mention the end of thousands of jobs and a way of life for thousands more. The salmon don't spawn in the Bay, they spawn in the rivers.

Since many are unfamiliar with the life cycle of salmon - here's a quick course:
Salmon (in this case, sockeye, which are "vegetarians") are born in the gravel beds of rivers, emerge and swim to a lake (Iliamna in his case) where they live until able to go down stream and into the ocean, then after four years, return to the same river they came from and spawn in the same area they emerged from, then die.

You can see from the image that the entire Iliamna drainage would be effected, and the later leases would effect Cook Inlet salmon.

Salmon are more important then minerals. Organic salmon is better than the heavily chemicalized farmed salmon. If you like farmed salmon with its generous helpings of antibiotics, food dye, copper oxide, copper hydroxide and cuprous thiocyanate, you'll love eating your canned minerals - best BBQed.

31 posted on 08/10/2019 3:33:27 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: dp0622

Yes, just like they were against oil pipelines because it would hurt wildlife.

But after the pipelines were built, the wildlife actually increased, I saw photos of animals happily walking on top of the pipelines.


47 posted on 08/10/2019 8:23:48 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson