Skip to comments.
The White House Readies Draft of Executive Order That Could Break the Internet
Gizmodo ^
Posted on 08/09/2019 8:11:29 PM PDT by TigerClaws
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
"No evidence" of bias other than the people working for the various companies on camera admitting there's a bias.
To: TigerClaws
Yeah this writer’s a ####.
2
posted on
08/09/2019 8:13:10 PM PDT
by
dp0622
(Bad, bad company Till the day I die.)
To: TigerClaws
To be clear, there is no evidence that social media networks are actively engaged in deliberate censorship of any particular political point of view.
Hahahahahahahahahaha.....stop it....yer killing me.
L
3
posted on
08/09/2019 8:13:42 PM PDT
by
Lurker
(Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
To: TigerClaws
Yeah that’s a humongous stretch to state that there is no evidence of silencing conservative voices.
To: TigerClaws
We need to run an experiment where we shut down CNN for 6 months to see if it will make any noticeable difference.
I suspect it won’t
5
posted on
08/09/2019 8:14:43 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
To: TigerClaws
Yes there is bias. Is government oversight the answer we want? Remember what paves the Road To Hell.
6
posted on
08/09/2019 8:15:42 PM PDT
by
lastchance
(Credo.)
To: dp0622
Most Gixmodo writers arr azzes
7
posted on
08/09/2019 8:16:02 PM PDT
by
Phillyred
To: TigerClaws
"No evidence" of bias other than the people working for the various companies on camera admitting there's a bias. The hilarious and inevitable outcome of this order, would it ever come into effect, would be for the companies in question to eliminate all political speech and allow nothing but pictures of grandchildren and kittens.
Can't wait for the stimulating internet of the future.
8
posted on
08/09/2019 8:17:34 PM PDT
by
semimojo
To: TigerClaws
It’s already broken...Trump’s fixin to fix it...
9
posted on
08/09/2019 8:18:23 PM PDT
by
amorphous
To: TigerClaws
To: All
The White House Readies Draft of Executive Order That Could Break the Internet Good. There's part of the Internet that needs "breaking".
11
posted on
08/09/2019 8:18:57 PM PDT
by
rockrr
( Everything is different now...)
To: lastchance
To: lastchance

From an article by Paul Collits at The Quandrant online.
13
posted on
08/09/2019 8:22:03 PM PDT
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
To: TigerClaws
stripping crucial protections sedition licenses from tech companies
14
posted on
08/09/2019 8:24:25 PM PDT
by
tomkat
( /.02)
To: semimojo
The hilarious and inevitable outcome of this order, would it ever come into effect, would be for the companies in question to eliminate all political speech and allow nothing but pictures of grandchildren and kittens. Can't wait for the stimulating internet of the future. I want to see these would be totalitarian Nazis destroyed. Americans need to make it clear that any company that censors speech will be wiped off the map.
Our system of government was not designed to exist in an environment where one side gets to speak and the other side does not. This existing system is lethal to our freedoms.
15
posted on
08/09/2019 8:25:21 PM PDT
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no oither sovereignty.")
To: grey_whiskers
I lived on the tenth floor of my dorm in college in the late 60s. We were tasked with coming up with a name for our floor......we came up with the Good In-10-tions. : )
16
posted on
08/09/2019 8:25:45 PM PDT
by
originalbuckeye
('In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act'- George Orwell..)
To: TigerClaws
They (sometimes) enforce their own respective terms of service agreements that oftentimes prohibit content that includes hate speech or calls to violence. For some, thats a political ideology. How disingenuous. The big thing on the left is to characterize all conservative ideas as racist. And since all conservative ideas are racist, i.e. hate speech, then the terms of service dictate that any conservative content be removed. Of course that isn't censorship, it's just applying the TOS.
I wonder how Gizmodo characterizes the recent banning of Senator Mitch McConnell, the deplatforming or demonetizing of conservatives like Paul Watson, the classifying as adult content of Prager U. videos, etc.? How are these things not censorship?
17
posted on
08/09/2019 8:26:19 PM PDT
by
exDemMom
(Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
To: rockrr
Good. There's part of the Internet that needs "breaking". Here we agree. The tech Nazis need to be defanged.
18
posted on
08/09/2019 8:26:24 PM PDT
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no oither sovereignty.")
To: TigerClaws
Once again, it’s not the internet or social websites that is the problem.
Just like the issue with guns, it’s not the guns, it’s the people.
19
posted on
08/09/2019 8:28:18 PM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
To: TigerClaws
a popular political talking point claiming that social media networks are censoring conservatives.That's a fact.
20
posted on
08/09/2019 8:29:30 PM PDT
by
McGruff
(If you hate our Country, or if you are not happy here, you can leave!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson