Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kalamata
Kalamata: "Try telling the truth.
It only hurts for a minute."

Sure, here's the truth about Kalamata: to defend your own misinterpretations of the Bible you've swallowed -- hook, line & sinker -- a huge pack of lies about natural-science.
The results have blinded you to evidence, to facts and even truth itself.

Kalamata: "You claim there are mountains of evidence for evolution, and yet you cannot present a single pebble of evidence.
Are you lying, or brainwashed?"

Complete nonsense -- there's evidence all around you, but you've blinded yourself to it and now claim there's no sucha thang as "sight".

Kalamata: "I have visited plenty of museums."

And yet you saw nothing because you'd already blinded yourself to it.

Kalamata: Wanna hear a related story?"

So apparently your acquaintance blinded himself while there?!

Kalamata: "You have presented no scientific evidence: only just-so stories and highly imaginative artwork."

You sound just like the Holocaust deniers I debated many years ago -- you close your eyes, you say you don't see it and then claim it's not even there.

Kalamata quoting: "“[O]nce the theory is in hand, Popper tells us, it is the duty of the scientist to extract from it logical but unexpected predictions that, if they are shown by experiment not to be correct, will serve to render the theory invalid. "

Exactly right, and the fact is that Darwin's little seed of an idea has grown & modified with accumulating evidence, now 150+ years later into a large tree, but his basic little idea has never been falsified.

Kalamata: "Evolutionists tend to spend their time trying to prove evolution and uniformitarianism to be true, except maybe when they are in the “cover up” mode.
That is not science."

Here's an example: the work of finding, recovering & identifying fossils has occupied many thousands of researchers over many, many decades.
Each researcher hopes to find a fossil which will upset, overturn & rewrite existing understandings of our past, and some actually do.
Those become famous and often enjoy a long rewarding career.

That's how science is supposed to work.

192 posted on 08/12/2019 1:46:54 PM PDT by BroJoeK ((a little historical perspective...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies ]


To: BroJoeK

>>Here’s an example: the work of finding, recovering & identifying fossils has occupied many thousands of researchers over many, many decades.
Each researcher hopes to find a fossil which will upset, overturn & rewrite existing understandings of our past, and some actually do.
Those become famous and often enjoy a long rewarding career.

That’s how science is supposed to work. <<
“Piltdown Man” was a (the?) triumph of the Scientific Method. It failed under proper scrutiny.


197 posted on 08/12/2019 4:14:36 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (As always IMHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

To: BroJoeK

>>Sure, here’s the truth about Kalamata: to defend your own misinterpretations of the Bible you’ve swallowed — hook, line & sinker — a huge pack of lies about natural-science. The results have blinded you to evidence, to facts and even truth itself.

You can do better than that.

********************************
>>Complete nonsense — there’s evidence all around you, but you’ve blinded yourself to it and now claim there’s no sucha thang as “sight”. And yet you saw nothing because you’d already blinded yourself to it.

Okay, you have been brainwashed.

********************************
>>So apparently your acquaintance blinded himself while there?!

Ad hominems are not evidence, no matter what your handlers told you.

********************************
>>You sound just like the Holocaust deniers I debated many years ago — you close your eyes, you say you don’t see it and then claim it’s not even there.

You do know that Darwinism was probably responsible for the holocaust, and worse. All four of the super-thugs of the 20th century believed in natural selection. They also believed there was no power higher than themselves, which is one of the societal burdens placed on us by Darwinism.

********************************
>>Exactly right, and the fact is that Darwin’s little seed of an idea has grown & modified with accumulating evidence, now 150+ years later into a large tree, but his basic little idea has never been falsified.

Nonsence. Evolution cannot be tested, and it cannot be questioned. That is not science, but religion.

********************************
>>Here’s an example: the work of finding, recovering & identifying fossils has occupied many thousands of researchers over many, many decades. Each researcher hopes to find a fossil which will upset, overturn & rewrite existing understandings of our past, and some actually do. Those become famous and often enjoy a long rewarding career. That’s how science is supposed to work.

Science has been working, but you refuse to see it. After 160 years, all the diggers have found in the fossil record is contrary evidence:

1) Abrupt appearance, then stasis
2) Disparity before diversity.
3) No transitional fossils.
4) Soft tissue in fossils
5) Incredible complexity in the Cambrian

All of those are contrary to Darwin’s theory. There is nothing in the fossil record that supports it.

Therefore, science says that evolution is not science.

Mr. Kalamata


208 posted on 08/12/2019 7:51:32 PM PDT by Kalamata (BIBLE RESEARCH TOOLS: http://bibleresearchtools.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 192 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson