Bro you’re way off the mark this time.
I read the article and though I wouldn’t vote for the woman, she seems quite bright and is right that the networks are attacking her because she is NOT who they want.
Anyone who mentions concern for our troops will not be the frontrunner of the dem party.
Just because the news attacks her doesn’t mean she isn’t paranoid. She is as guilty as Trump is of ‘supporting’ al queda, which is not guilty in both cases. But she couldn’t admit that.
Think Gabbard showing she can effectively criticize an opponent may possibly make her a consideration for someone as a possible VP candidate.
I don’t have a clear idea though how this all will play out in their arriving at their choice of candidate or who might be allied with who.