Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Modern Monetary Theory Is Just Plain Stupid
Wall Street Insights and Indictments ^ | May 5, 2019 | Shah Gilani

Posted on 08/01/2019 4:51:21 AM PDT by gattaca

The suddenly simple answer to funding the Green New Deal, Medicare-for-all, free college, and two Teslas in every garage, making the rounds as Modern Monetary Theory (MMT), is a joke.

Only no one should be laughing.

MMT is not only dangerous for reasons that no one’s bothering to bring up, but also it’s just plain stupid.

Here’s why MMT is really a proposition, why it’s dangerous, and how stupid you must be to believe it’s legitimate…

Take Your Share of This Cash Pool As stupid as MMT is, I’m going to tell you something else just as stupid before I go on.

Think about this for a sec: everyone pays or has paid rent for something – you’ve “paid rent” for a car when you travel out of state, you’ve paid rent for a place to live, etc. Well, even federal agencies are required, by law, to pay rent – even though you know your tax dollars pay for each building being used by the DOJ, FDA, Congress, and the White House.

So where’s all that rent money going?

I’ll tell you where – the Treasury Department, where it’ll amass a value of over $11.1 billion this year alone.

Haven’t heard of it before? Don’t worry, you’re not alone. There’s a reason the media hasn’t highlighted this opportunity before – and it’s because they don’t want you to get the money you deserve.

But if you learn how to play your cards right, using a little-known investment, you could get a slice of it.

Even 0.1% of that $11.1 billion is $11,100,000 – but more people are learning about this opportunity.

Click here to learn how you can get on the distribution list.

Now, let’s dive into MMT – and why it’s so dangerous.

What is Modern Monetary Theory? It’s more of a proposition than a theory.

It’s a proposal to pay for government programs by printing money – though that’s not how it starts out.

The initial expectation is that governments pay for the things they hand out by issuing debt, which bond investors buy in the form of U.S. Treasury bills, notes, and bonds.

Bond investors are expected to keep buying Treasuries as long as interest rates are low and as long as there’s no inflation.

In the rarified ether of this, all boats rise with a rising tide of money theory, deficits don’t matter either if there’s no inflation.

If inflation rears its ugly head, theorists say, it can be killed by taxing people – so, not to worry.

The real backdrop of the theory supposes a country that issues its own currency can keep printing that currency to pay for whatever bigger governments promise their citizen and non-citizens.

Printing money, the currency the U.S. owns and controls (theorists suppose), to keep paying for trillions of dollars of free stuff if and when bond investors stop buying bonds and rates start to rise on their own – maybe because bond investors are selling bonds, driving rates higher because they see signs of inflation, or they’re selling bonds because the value of the U.S. dollar on international markets is falling (because so many dollars are being printed) – is the crux of the airy-fairy theory.

Governments can pay for free stuff, without taxing people, by printing money.

[DECLASSIFIED] A Cold War defection brings to light a huge profit opportunity today

“Wouldn’t It Be Nice” is the first track on side one of the Beach Boys seminal 1966 album Pet Sounds. The lyrics in the bridge after the second chorus are:

Maybe if we think and wish and hope and pray it might come true,

Baby, then there wouldn’t be a single thing we couldn’t do

That about sums up MMT.

A Worse Master According to George Selgin, director of the Cato Institute’s Center for Monetary and Financial Alternatives, “The theory does… lend itself to use, if not to abuse, by big spending proponents, they like to harp on its observation that governments’ right to create money gives them practically unlimited spending capacity. That claim is true, if not banal. But it’s also misleading: Governments may be able to spend without limit; but outside of recessions they can’t do so to any great extent without having to make their citizens ultimately foot the bill, either by paying higher taxes or by having to endure inflation. When politicians promise something for nothing, people should be wary, there’s nothing to MMT that should make them any less so.”

What makes MMT proponents dangerous in my mind is their complete lack of address, maybe because of their complete lack of understanding or their complete ignorance, when supposing the U.S. owns its currency or controls its monetary policy and can just order dollar printing presses to be turned on and left on.

The Federal Reserve System owns America’s money. Look at any bill in your purse or wallet; it says “FEDERAL RESERVE NOTE” right up top.

Yes, the U.S. Treasury prints the Fed’s money and the Secretary of the Treasury signs it, but that’s a ruse. It’s still the Fed’s game; the Treasury only legitimizes it by playing its part as printer and minter. Government officials legitimize Federal Reserve Notes as legal tender because that’s the bargain they struck with the Fed when they legislated it into existence in 1913.

If you read my columns regularly, you know this.

You also know that bargain was about the Fed controlling money and credit as a private institution in return for printing enough money to finance federal deficits.

With a wink and a nod, the Fed’s been practicing MMT for a very long time.

[CRITICAL] Tale of the Disappearing Man Cracks $686 Billion Market

Only, it’s their game and their tables we’re playing on. The government can’t just command the Fed to print money any more than they can command them to raise or lower interest rates.

As much as I’d like the Fed to be legislated into the dustbin, if the government wants to, it can kill the Federal Reserve System, take over the money supply, and print to its heart’s content.

That wouldn’t be good.

The Congressional Budget Office already predicts $1 trillion annual federal deficits during the next decade and total U.S. national debt already exceeds $22 trillion.

Federal deficits and debts either matter or they don’t. Inflation either matters or it doesn’t.

Venezuela, Zimbabwe, and Argentina are examples of central banks running printing presses to please politicians, which ended in hyperinflation and economic collapse.

Spending trillions of dollars more and printing it to pay for programs is both dangerous and stupid.

That’s why MMT matters… only if you’re stupid.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 08/01/2019 4:51:21 AM PDT by gattaca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gattaca

MMT

Magic Money Theory

Why?

Because the current Federal Reserve “Keynesian Theory” is now accepted as the fraud it is.


2 posted on 08/01/2019 4:56:15 AM PDT by TheNext (Diversity: Darker Replaces Lighter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Gold Standard


3 posted on 08/01/2019 5:02:14 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12)There were Democrat espionage operations on Republican candidates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Eat, drink, and be merry! Just put the tab on the Federal Reserve balance sheet!


4 posted on 08/01/2019 5:08:27 AM PDT by buckalfa (Earth First ! We Will Strip Mine The Other Planets Later !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNext

They taught Keynesian economics at UT and even as a freshman you could see that it was a fraud. Nothing quite lined up with the observable world.


5 posted on 08/01/2019 5:28:03 AM PDT by willyd (I for one welcome our NSA overlords)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: willyd
It’s falls apart because of the same “thing” as does communism.

The assumption that production will remain a constant (in the mathematical sense).

We may as well base our dollar on the tulip, at least the bulb can be replanted.

6 posted on 08/01/2019 6:12:31 AM PDT by NativeSon ( Grease the floor with Crisco when I dance the disco)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

“Governments may be able to spend without limit; but outside of recessions they can’t do so to any great extent without having to make their citizens ultimately foot the bill, either by paying higher taxes or by having to endure inflation.”

This is one of the main pillars of China’s growth. When the party is over, there is a hell of a hangover.


7 posted on 08/01/2019 6:51:36 AM PDT by BeauBo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNext
I'm an old timer and although my health is excellent so far (I take zero meds) I figure I have about 7 yrs left. Most folks as they get older bemoan their age and wish they could be young again. Not me. I have lived a truly good life in the greatest country to ever exist and grew up in the golden age of the 1950's. I never finished HS but did get my GED in the USAF. I married my childhood sweetheart at age 23 and remain married to this day. Of course things were not all great all the time, life doesn't work that way and there have been ups and downs. But I learned at an early age the work ethic needed to make a decent life and followed it diligently. I saved, invested and paid attention. Doing these things allowed us to retire at age 52. I am happy with my life but looking ahead I see bad things happening to this country and yet feel zero sympathy for its citizens since it is through their own actions and inaction's that we have come to be where we are. We are seeing the following unfold before our eyes. “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates promising the most benefits from the public treasury with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy, always followed by a dictatorship. The average age of the world's greatest civilizations has been 200 years. These nations have progressed through this sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; From spiritual faith to great courage; From courage to liberty; From liberty to abundance; From abundance to selfishness; From selfishness to apathy; From apathy to dependence; From dependence back into bondage.” ― Alexander Fraser Tytler
8 posted on 08/01/2019 8:06:16 AM PDT by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15

Well said.

I never saw 0bama as a problem. To me, the problem was an American electorate that put him in office.


9 posted on 08/01/2019 8:14:50 AM PDT by henkster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: henkster

“To me, the problem was an American electorate that put him in office”

Exactly and that is why I have no sympathy for those who may have to live through the possibly crappy future in store.

The phrase, “We get the government we deserve”

Obama was elected by a truly stupid electorate who let itself be conned by a media insisting a vote against Obama was a vote for racism.

Anyone with 5 functioning brain cells saw thru that fraud in 30 seconds.

Obama was THE reason we have President Trump thereby proving that the phrases, “Every cloud has a silver lining”, and “Some good comes out of the worst situations”


10 posted on 08/01/2019 8:36:26 AM PDT by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo; gattaca

>
“Governments may be able to spend without limit; but outside of recessions they can’t do so to any great extent without having to make their citizens ultimately foot the bill, either by paying higher taxes or by having to endure inflation.”

This is one of the main pillars of China’s growth. When the party is over, there is a hell of a hangover.
>

It also fails to note the gorilla in the room when it comes to the U.S.: The govt *ISN’T* authorized to ‘spend w/o limit’. There’s A1S8 and the plethora of OTHER Amendments to limit that ability.

Course, we jettisoned a Constitutional Republic ~1913 (some would say @ the War Between the States). Either way, there can be no debate of the violations (’nothing but gold and silver’, let alone ZERO authority for Congress to give any power to a non-govt entity)


11 posted on 08/01/2019 9:15:33 AM PDT by i_robot73 (One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Modern monetary encapsulated theory in 20 words:

When you propose to rob from Peter to pay Paul, you usually can count on the enthusiastic support of Paul.


12 posted on 08/01/2019 9:16:59 AM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15

Great post.

May we all seek the best life possible,

with in the parameters of the Government we have been blessed or cursed.

Trump said he did not drink because life can be difficult enough without it.


13 posted on 08/01/2019 11:44:42 AM PDT by TheNext (Diversity: Darker Replaces Lighter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson