Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Lies, damned lies, statistics and Chinese statistics.
1 posted on 07/21/2019 3:52:40 AM PDT by Zhang Fei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Zhang Fei

Bet they wish they had half that number. Same with India.


2 posted on 07/21/2019 3:58:51 AM PDT by Reno89519 (No Amnesty! No Catch-and-Release! Just Say No to All Illegal Aliens! Arrest & Deport!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zhang Fei

I don’t believe it. One child policy was always mostly a sham. I engaged in trade with some family-owned businesses in late 1990s and mentioned that big families at least in northern China were a norm. By big families I mean 3+ children. They usually had older male kid officially and the rest undocumented.


3 posted on 07/21/2019 3:59:09 AM PDT by NorseViking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zhang Fei

“Lies, damned lies, statistics and Chinese statistics.“
*

Yeh, their biggest problem is their out of whack boy:girl birthdate ratio. It’s been about 100 boys : 80 girls for years. Consequently, young Chinese men are wife shop in neighboring countries. Will be interesting to see how this plays out in coming years....


4 posted on 07/21/2019 4:05:53 AM PDT by snoringbear (,W,E.oGovernment is the Pimp,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zhang Fei

“justify”

Sorta like the US does with that second hand smoke BS.


8 posted on 07/21/2019 4:14:38 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zhang Fei

The article presumes the fallacy that the population number is known with the accuracy to juggle the numbers as is done by the author


11 posted on 07/21/2019 5:05:31 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12)There were Democrat espionage operations on Republican candidates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zhang Fei

A few hundred million here, a few hundred million there, pretty soon you’re talking big population.


13 posted on 07/21/2019 5:50:32 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zhang Fei

1.4 billion or

1.28 billion

I dont think that this is a serious difference at those numbers.


14 posted on 07/21/2019 5:55:03 AM PDT by Chickensoup (Voter ID for 2020!! Leftists totalitarian fascists appear to be planning to eradicate conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zhang Fei
If that's true, it means that China's productivity and per capita income is much higher than currently stated.
19 posted on 07/21/2019 7:50:35 AM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zhang Fei
What they have is a rapidly aging population and the biggest economic slowdown since 1992. Sadly they got old before they got rich. 😆
20 posted on 07/21/2019 7:51:14 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Zhang Fei

The provinces lie about everything else. In the old days it was about rice production, now its about economic growth and debt. Why wouldn’t they lie about births and population?


25 posted on 07/21/2019 8:14:44 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson