[Mrs. Don-o]

That picture you posted is a photoshopped composite. I can't identify every element, but the underlying graphic of Christ is a Christian image --- overlaid, in your post, by some evil thing, Satan-knows what.

The original mosaic: Christ the King, Pantocrator (Ruler of All) at the Shrine of the Immaculate Conception in Washington, DC:

Notice, no goat-horns, no pentagrams, no occult symbolism, etc. It shows Him in power and judgment. Artistically, of course, tastes vary: some think it's awesome and others think it's awful, but listen up: it's not Baphomet or whatever that unclean, diabolical name may be.

Please do not facilitate the desecration of an icon of Christ.

[Tax-chick]

some think it's awesome and others think it's awful

I'm on the not-loving-it side. The face and the pecs are not iconic, or iconish, if you get what I mean.

"rx" also posted that Meghan Markle, Duchess of Sussex, is a man, and the child "supposedly" born to "her" and Prince Harry is a "bastard," presumably stolen from his parents by Satanists. (At least it's a change from the racist comments about Meghan.)

Sometimes I feel nervous about leaving my house, knowing that people like this are out there, somewhere, apparently invisible to the naked eye. This very person could be in my Walmart!

[rx]

I did not photoshop that image. It’s imagined existence did not spring out of my head or desire. I would only add the there are such people out there ready to jump at such opportunities, apparently because they believe such to be the case. They do then label such things thusly.

I did not intend to upset your sensibilities or belief system and for that I apologize.

[mumblypeg]

Mrs. Don-O, the poster to whom you replied is not only desecrating a Christian icon, he or she is also claiming Meghan Markle is a man.

Another lefty troll trying to float wild rumors to make conservatives look like conspiracy-theorist nutjobs.