Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Year After the Supreme Court Rules Against Unions, What’s Changed
The Daily Signal ^ | July 9, 2018 | Kevin Mooney

Posted on 07/10/2019 8:07:34 AM PDT by yoe

Pick a state, any state where rank-and-file public employees differ with the political agenda of their union leadership, and they can make a clean break from the union if they choose.

That’s because the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that nonunion government workers can’t be compelled to pay dues or other fees to support a union.

A year after that decision, though, attorneys and policy analysts who spoke with The Daily Signal say they find that too many Americans remain unaware of their First Amendment rights in the workforce.

They also express concern that union operatives and their allies in government are pushing legislation to undermine the high court’s 5-4 decision on June 27, 2018, in ( Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees.)

(Excerpt) Read more at dailysignal.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: scotus; seiu; unions
Know your rights.....
1 posted on 07/10/2019 8:07:34 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yoe

Did SCOTUS rule “against unions” or for workers?


2 posted on 07/10/2019 8:11:42 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe

In California the state employees still need to get permission from the union to stop paying dues. I think it is Right to Work that is suing to overthrow the law that gives the union this power.


3 posted on 07/10/2019 8:13:25 AM PDT by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yoe
"...A Year After the Supreme Court Rules Against Unions, What’s Changed..."

Apparently, not much.

Like most things that Leftists disagree with, they simply seem to have ignored it. They still seem perfectly able and willing to gouge people who don't want anything to do with them.

If we did the same, they would scream bloody murder, it would be in the media, in the courts, and we would be forced at the point of law to comply...as we should be if it is legal.

That is who we are. We respect rulings. They don't.

And they are never called to account for ignoring it.

4 posted on 07/10/2019 8:18:05 AM PDT by rlmorel (Trump to China: This Capitalist Will Not Sell You the Rope with Which You Will Hang Us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
The Roberts Court is anything but crystal clear, (articles on court's ruling)
5 posted on 07/10/2019 9:14:39 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yoe

“Know your rights..... “

Yeah, but also, “know your local union goons!” Having “won your right” not to join a union, now the trick is to keep your teeth!


6 posted on 07/10/2019 9:19:03 AM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
...the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that nonunion government workers can’t be compelled to pay dues or other fees to support a union.

7 posted on 07/10/2019 11:08:08 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson