Posted on 07/05/2019 1:31:14 PM PDT by Libloather
February 21, 2019 (LifeSiteNews) Planned Parenthood CEO Leana Wen sat down with presidential daughter Chelsea Clinton for a piece published in Interview Magazine this week, casting the abortion giant as an imperiled defender of women and claiming those who end preborn lives are the ones truly deserving the life label.
Perhaps the most controversial part of the interview was when the two ladies discussed the labels of the abortion debate.
I also want us to consider our choice of language when we define these movements. The pro-choice/pro-life dichotomy is problematic to me, Wen said. Clinton agreed, saying she refuse[s] to refer to the anti-choice movement as anything other than anti-choice.
Our nurses and our clinicians are all here because we believe in life, Wen claimed. Being pro-choice is being pro-women. Its being pro-family. Its being pro-community. Its being pro-life.
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
Whats disturbing is that her family came here to seek asylum from one child policy communist China.
When your deadliest enemy starts using your language to describe themselves, you know you’re winning the argument.
George Orwell, pick up the white courtesy phone.
They will say anything to justify making money from murder.
“I worship Satan because I’m a devout Christian.”
Even Charles Manson didn’t try to use this defense.
Reminiscent of A.G. Janet Reno’s testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee after the Clinton’s had the Branch Dividians in Waco TX massacred; “we had to kill the children in order to save them”.
This is Planned Parenthood’s effort to be creative. By their Alinsky tactics to turn the message, they are using a false narrative to destroy life and God’s creative masterpiece.
Beat me to it.
No one who is pro-abortion is pro-choice, since “choice” implies that women have all the facts. When the abortion industry starts informing women accurately about the characteristics of the fetus at the age they are contemplating killing it (to include its mental and physical characteristics), and the psychological and physical aftermath of abortion, then they can accurately call themselves “pro-choice.” Until then, they are just abortion shills.
No wonder they try so hard to cover it up. "Choice", "reproductive care", riiiiight. Ughhh...
bump
Isaiah 5:20
Didnt they claim they never did abortions to keep federal funding? I swear I heard that maybe back in 2016. I wish funding could stop. Of course too late with a democratic house.
And in a similar vein, Auschwitz was built to promote Zionism.
(Someone had to follow Godwin's Law)
Is that like having to destroy the village in order to save it?
I think I will kill someone and say that I did it because I'm Pro-Life! I guess if I said that, I'll get off..😋
Yeah, decapitating babies & feeding their parts into a garbage Dispose-All is pro-life.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.