To: reaganaut1
The usual excuse not to release is that they want to protect “sources and methods”.
But here, it seems obvious that they are withholding the information from the public because “it’s really embarrassing”.
Which is a terrible reason to hide what they’ve got.
11 posted on
07/03/2019 6:56:50 AM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
(If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
To: ClearCase_guy
Which is a terrible reason to hide what they’ve got.
My suspicion is that they are not releasing because they lose leverage after they do. The threat of release is actually more scary to the opposition than the actual release.
13 posted on
07/03/2019 7:00:44 AM PDT by
Antoninus
("In Washington, swamp drain you.")
To: ClearCase_guy
sources and methods
used for a deep state coup d'etat.Fixed it.
26 posted on
07/03/2019 7:16:08 AM PDT by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: ClearCase_guy
Telling truth will erode public confidence, lying will erode public confidence. They are choosing the path of least erosion, which implies just how bad their conduct really is.
The insitutional, rank and file feds are totally insulated from public outrage anyway, so they are free to do as what pleases themselves.
-- Which is a terrible reason to hide what they've got. --
Might be the best reason. What if the public was given evidence that in no uncertain terms, JFK was assassinated by the CIA. Tell the truth, or lie to the public and try to clean house in the shadows?
44 posted on
07/03/2019 8:38:03 AM PDT by
Cboldt
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson