[bert]

You made my point

There is a large body of evidence that the Temples never existed on the Temple Mount and the wall is not and never was a part of either temple.

The archeological architedtural evidence is very convincing

I’m a You Tube Scholar : )

[HombreSecreto]

There is a large body of evidence that the Temples never existed on the Temple Mount and the wall is not and never was a part of either temple.

---

If the Pool of Siloam is in the City of David, and that’s where the Temple actually was, interesting.

Just think how nuts the Muslims will be if Isreael says “Ah, the Temple was here. We’ll rebuild it and you can keep your ‘Temple Mount.’”

Cup of trembling indeed.

[dp0622]

You are right.

Archaeological evidence does not lie!!

That sounded good and I believe it but I am SO ignorant, I am not sure which Temples and which Wall you are referring to.

I could have lied and said I agreed, but i don’t mind people finding out how little I know anymore :)

And I am now curious as to what you are alluding to.

Thanks ahead of time.

[Poison Pill]

There is a large body of evidence that the Temples never existed on the Temple Mount and the wall is not and never was a part of either temple. The archeological architedtural evidence is very convincing

There is no archeological evidence that Solomon's Temple existed at all.