Posted on 07/01/2019 11:10:58 AM PDT by chief lee runamok
Following President Trump's controversial meeting with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un, Fox News senior strategist analyst Gen. Jack Keane argued it's imperative that the government see real evidence of denuclearization from the country before negotiating further.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
-Wiki
Keene is ridiculous......and I think, a never Trump
(Correct me if Im wrong)
...say the arm chair quarter backs whom failed to move the ball when they had their turn
Trump swallowed some more Kim-Chi.
I don’t think he’s here for the hunting, as the old joke goes.
Tell this NeoCon war-seeker to go to Hell.
Nixon made a point of keeping the State Dept. out of the loop in serious foreign negotiations, knowing their propensity to screw up a wet dream and rightly so.
The Norks have to make some serious concessions to get sanctions removed and we have to respond in kind, but there must be a means to verify their concessions, trust but verify type conditions. They want us out of the South, fine, I say we get out, but the nukes have to go if we agree and should they continue this game, it’s time to play the nuclear Japan card which will send them and the Chicoms into duck fits.
If Keane had his way, we’d all be dead 150 times already.
I realize most of these type folks have much more inside information than I do but I realize they are wrong as much of the time as I am. We are living in an age we put to much dependence in opinions. To be mostly honest I wonder some time who is more correct informed Opinions or what when we form our opinion on reasoning. I have agreed quite often with Presidents that had opinions and most of them were wrong such as Iraq and their weapons of mass destruction. If we took as good of care of those we send off to fight out wars as we do politicians we may think more honestly!
In the past there were dictators that I didn’t think we should talk to. It wasn’t so much the idea of talking, as who would be the person representing our side.
Compare Obama talking with Iran, to Trump’s talking to North Korea. The difference is clear to most thinking people.
Those that can’t see it, need to think long and hard.
Trump has a goal, and he’s not going to be talked down.
Excellent.
Q: “What kind of stupid diplomat makes confident predictions about future events over which he has no control?”
A: Every kind. It’s in their job description. As with MSM and experts regarding the economy before DJT was elected: Here’s an excerpt from Nov. 1 2016 NYT:
“The conventional wisdom is that, right off the bat, the stock market would fall precipitously. Simon Johnson, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology economist, posited that Mr. Trumps presidency would likely cause the stock market to crash and plunge the world into recession. He predicted that Mr. Trumps anti-trade policies would cause a sharp slowdown, much like the British are experiencing after their vote to exit the European Union.
In explaining his prediction, Professor Johnson wrote that Europes economy is so fragile that Trumps trade-led recession would tip Europe back into full-blown recession, which would likely precipitate a serious banking crisis. After that, he continued: If this risk were not contained and the probability of a European banking debacle is already disconcertingly high there would be a further negative spiral. Either way, the effects on emerging markets and all lower-income countries would be dramatic.
I think you are wrong.
I've seen him on FOX and while I don't always agree with him, I've never gotten the impression that he is a never Trumper.
I don't know that with life betting certainty.
Fine. Saved a guy who shot during an exercise . I do not trust him if he ever was promoted under Obama’s administration.
Guy is probably turned on by war. He should be ignored.
The diplomats work for Trump. They’ll do what he decides, or they can go seek employment elsewhere.
Who cares what they think, we did not elect them president.
The Fox pundits are among the worse!
President Trumps meeting with Kim had more to do with letting Dear Leader know that Donald Trump was going to be President of the United States for a long time to come, regardless of what Kim is being told .
President Trump could really use an agreement with Kim in the near future so Kim has pretty much the most leverage and goodwill that he will ever have to cut a deal
If Kim continues to stall in hopes of sabotaging President Trumps re-election, the spirit of goodwill will evaporate and any leverage he has to cut a deal will be lost.
President Trump is not known for extending goodwill to people who try to screw him
“I realize most of these type folks have much more inside information than I do but I realize they are wrong as much of the time as I am!”
We don’t get paid for our opinions nor do we have to be quoted to feel good like this clown and similar clowns.
IF the electorate of the U.S.A. reads, and applies brainwork to what they read as do a multitude of FReepers winning the upcoming elections is doubtful.
Yeah, and I'm sure the sun will rise in the East tomorrow.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.