Posted on 06/27/2019 8:17:13 AM PDT by gattaca
The Supreme Court on Thursday blocked, for now, the Trump administration's plan to include a question on the 2020 census that inquires about a person’s citizenship status.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Chief Judas strikes again.
Why do we even have a country? What’s the point?
Taxes.
Don’t believe everything you read on FoxNews.
The question stays if the department can provide a reason for it being there.
WTH is the purpose of a census then????????
Can we just dancing around the issue and get it over with?
I’m getting that feeling about him.
the headline misleads.
the question _stays_ for now but they have to give reasoning for putting the question on ... reasoning besides what was given.
will be easy
OK...So this is not after the previous decision of the court????
The question stays if the department can provide a reason for it being there.
They just keep pushing...
Yes. I saw this article at Reuters:
U.S. Supreme Court blocks Trump’s census citizenship question, for now
The U.S. Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a significant defeat on Thursday, ruling that his administration did not give an adequate explanation for its plan to include a contentious citizenship question on the 2020 census and preventing its addition to the decennial survey for now.
The citizenship question is NOT on the form.
Another gift from the Roberts court to the libs.
What if the department takes their sweet time in providing the “reason” for the question being there?
What if they provide a reason and then some liberal judge declares it inadequate?
We’re running up against the clock here, folks.
I saw the same information at Reuters, I posted the link just a few min ago on this thread.
exactly and they punted on the gerrymandering, the Dems rig, cheat and then really cheat some more
Ine question: why can’t Trump admin add the citizenship question to the form, and then let the Demonrats have to challenge it in the courts?
No, the case was remanded to the district court which had blocked the question.
Commerce now has an opportunity to come up with a justification for the question that passes muster but time is running out.
"we cannot ignore the disconnect between the decision made and the explanation given.... If judicial review is to be more than an empty ritual, it must demand something better than the explanation offered for the action taken in this case. In these unusual circumstances, the District Court was warranted in remanding to the agency, and we affirm that disposition."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.