Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTUS: Census question Stays; but needs further explanation from the agency.
Supreme Court of the United States ^ | 06-27-2019 | John G. Roberts

Posted on 06/27/2019 7:38:42 AM PDT by TexasGurl24

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-206 next last
To: TexasGurl24

That’s it.

Then the question is on the form.

The only issue now is time.


Agree. The Commerce Department just needs to dust off its rationale they’ve likely been working on (if they’re competent) that easily falls under “Rational Basis,” and that’s that.


41 posted on 06/27/2019 7:50:45 AM PDT by HombreSecreto (The life of a repo man is always intense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24
Since it's going back down to the lower court, even if they decided the citizenship question can be on the Census, there is not enough time now to get it on the 2020 Census.

Effectively, the question will not be on the 2020 Census.

With the rapid demographic changes, it's less likely it will be on the 2030 (or later) Census.

42 posted on 06/27/2019 7:50:53 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay

That’s what the courts want. They are a corrupt bunch who settled nothing. Yes you have the right as long as the reason is fully explained only leaves the obvious question. What does fully explained mean...well, to find that do something and wait another year for us to tell you. Corruption at work.


43 posted on 06/27/2019 7:51:12 AM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas

The media doesn’t know what it is talking about. The court said: “The question can be there, so long as the agency explains why it is including it.”


44 posted on 06/27/2019 7:51:19 AM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

The court said that the self-imposed deadline by the government is not binding, and there is in fact enough time.


45 posted on 06/27/2019 7:51:53 AM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

The headline of this thread is not ideal.


46 posted on 06/27/2019 7:52:04 AM PDT by Stravinsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

Yes he is. Robert’s is a disgrace to the high court. Just another Bush the younger questionable decision.


47 posted on 06/27/2019 7:52:15 AM PDT by BlackAdderess (The hysteria about Trump reminds me a lot of the Y2K hysteria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

in order to have true representation of the populous, a verifiable number of citizens is needed.


48 posted on 06/27/2019 7:52:19 AM PDT by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

Just print them as is and people who want to challenge it can take it to court. Play their game


49 posted on 06/27/2019 7:52:47 AM PDT by wiseprince
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

I’ve been watching Fox for 30 minutes and they are straight up reporting that the citizenship question will not be included in the 2020 census pursuant to this unanimous ruling.


50 posted on 06/27/2019 7:52:56 AM PDT by truthkeeper (All Trump Has Going for Him is the Votes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

I’m confused. Fox News (Eddie Munster) said 9 to 0, the citizenship question cannot be added to the 2020 census, loss for Trump.


51 posted on 06/27/2019 7:53:07 AM PDT by RooRoobird20 ( "Democrats haven't been this angry since Republicans freed the slaves”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: be-baw

Right.
:(!


52 posted on 06/27/2019 7:53:30 AM PDT by milagro (There is no peace in appeasement!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BlackAdderess

I wonder what would would happen if millions of citizens refused to comply with the census...


53 posted on 06/27/2019 7:53:43 AM PDT by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

But in effect the Court blocked the question for 2020 on the specious argument that yes, it legal, but first a lower court must examine the REASON a lawful question was included.
NEVER done before.
Conservatives will regret Gorsuch and Kavanaugh as we regret Roberts.
The ONLY conservatives on that court are Thomas and Alitto.


54 posted on 06/27/2019 7:54:39 AM PDT by ZULU (Impeach John Roberts for corruption. SOROS IS "SPARTACUS" BOOKER'S LANISTA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24

Another step in the Mexican takeover of our nation


55 posted on 06/27/2019 7:54:50 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RooRoobird20

It MAYBE could be—but not until 2030.


56 posted on 06/27/2019 7:55:18 AM PDT by milagro (There is no peace in appeasement!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: truthkeeper

FOX is full of morons. They haven’t read the opinion.

The court gutted all of the challenges that NY raised. The court held that the agency does have to explain why it wants the question, but the agency can do that.


57 posted on 06/27/2019 7:55:24 AM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: TexasGurl24
if the agency gives a good reason for the Census question then it stays

Gives... to whom?

58 posted on 06/27/2019 7:55:35 AM PDT by grobdriver (BUILD KATE'S WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla

The form printing deadline is approaching.


59 posted on 06/27/2019 7:55:58 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

And who decides what constitutes good...


60 posted on 06/27/2019 7:56:09 AM PDT by mewzilla (Break out the mustard seeds,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-206 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson