Reparations for Slavery

Several Democratic presidential hopefuls are calling for Americans to make reparations for slavery. On June 19, the House judiciary subcommittee on the constitution, civil rights, and civil liberties held a hearing. Its stated purpose was "to examine, through open and constructive discourse, the legacy of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade, its continuing impact on the community and the path to restorative justice."

Slavery was a gross violation of human rights. Justice demands that all participants in the Trans-Atlantic slave trade make compensatory reparation payments to slaves. However, there is no way that Europeans could have captured millions of Africans. That means compensation would have to be paid by Africans and Arabs who captured and sold slaves to Europeans in addition to the people who bought and used slaves. Since slaves and slave traders and owners are no longer with us, compensation is beyond our reach and it's a matter that will have to be settled in hell or heaven.

Let's pretend for a moment that the reparations issue makes a modicum of sense. There's the question of responsibility. More explicitly, should we compensate a black person of today by punishing a white person of today, by taking his money, for what a white person of yesteryear did to a black person of yesteryear? If we believe in individual accountability, we should find that doing so is unjust. In other words, are the tens millions of Europeans, Asian, and Latin Americans who immigrated to the United States in the late 19th and 20th centuries responsible for slavery, and should they be forced to cough up reparations? What about descendants of Northern whites who fought and died in the name of freeing slaves? Should they pay reparations to black Americans? What about non-slave-owning Southern whites -- who were a majority of Southern whites -- should their descendants be made to pay reparations?

Reparations advocates make the unchallenged pronouncement that the United States became rich on the backs of free black labor. That's utter nonsense. While some slave owners became rich, slavery doesn't have a good record of producing wealth. Slavery existed in the southern states and outlawed in most of the northern states. Buying into the reparations argument suggests that the antebellum South was rich and the slave-starved North was poor. The truth is just the opposite. In fact, the poorest states and regions of our country were places where slavery flourished: Mississippi, Alabama, and Georgia. And the richest states and regions were those where slavery was absent: Pennsylvania, New York, and Massachusetts.

The reparations movement would be an amusing sideshow were it not for its damaging distractions. It grossly misallocates resources that could be better spent elsewhere. According to the state Department of Education, 75% of black California boys cannot meet state reading standards. In 2016, in 13 of Baltimore's 39 high schools, not a single student scored proficient on the state's mathematics exam. In six other high schools, only 1% tested proficient in math. The same story of low education outcomes can be told about most cities with large black populations. I'd like to see lawyers bring class-action suits against public school systems in cities like Philadelphia, Baltimore, Washington, Detroit, and Los Angeles for conferring fraudulent high school diplomas. Such diplomas attest a 12th-grade level of academic achievement when in fact those youngsters often cannot perform at sixth- or seventh-grade levels.

The nation's most dangerous big cities are Detroit, Oakland, St. Louis, Memphis, Stockton, Birmingham, Baltimore, Cleveland, Atlanta, Chicago, and Milwaukee. The common characteristic of most of these cities is that they have predominantly black populations and blacks have considerable political power as mayors, city councilmen and chiefs of police. Energy spent on reparations should be used to solve those problems.

As of 2014, U.S. taxpayers have spent $22 trillion on Lyndon Johnson's War on Poverty (in constant 2012 dollars). Adjusting for inflation, that's three times more than was spent on all military wars since the American Revolution. If money alone were the answer, the many issues facing a large segment of the black community would have been solved.

There's another possible reparations issue completely ignored: Blacks as well as whites live on land that was taken, sometimes brutally, from American Indians. Do blacks and whites owe American Indians anything?

Democrats of old used their own money to buy their slaves.

Democrats today use taxpayer money to buy their slaves.

And as far as test scores go ...

When actually trying to learn something is frowned upon as “ acting white” and the black community does little to encourage respect and protects feral youths, what outcome would be expected?

41 posted on 06/26/2019 9:40:51 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys-Can't drive, can't ski, can't fly, can't skipper a boat-But they know what's best for you.)

Democrats should pay any reparations because they benefited from slavery. Republicans freed the slaves.

As to reparations, I am totally against it. The entire concept is political pandering. I’d be hard-pressed to support even $1 per person in reparations.

Actually, reparations might not be such a bad idea, with conditions.

- Anyone who accepts reparations, gets them (guaranteed!).
- Everyone who gets them, renounces US citizenship, ineligible for life to re-apply.
- Everyone gets a paid-for one-way flight to the African (or other ancestral country 'he' was enslaved from) country of his choice.
- Funding is available for 40 rural acres, or an average size suburban/city house, paid directly to the seller from the US Treasury/Embassy, at market rate.

and they didn't even free their own slaves till 8 months after the war was over.

Yup, funny thing about the Emancipation Proclamation, it was only directed at the Confederate States, where Lincoln had no power. The North (where he did have authority), didn't have anything passed to free their slaves. Technically, slavery ended in the South eight months before it did in the North.

Slavery was done away with 150 years ago. Nobody alive today was ever a slave. What is all this talk about reparations for slavery then? It is a phoney effort by the democrats to mislead the black people who they consider too dense to realize what is being done to them. If I were black, I’d start voting Republican.

American blacks would not be living in poverty in Africa (other than first-generation African immigrants). They wouldn't be alive.

Each person is the result of matings over countless generations by innumerable ancestors. The men and women who wound up as slaves in what is now the US (mostly before 1776) were from various places in Africa and I think the general practice was to mix people up so you would not have a lot of slaves who spoke the same language in the same location. The slave children born in America had fathers and mothers who would never have met if they had remained in their native villages in Africa.

I’m starting to understand that poster I read that said:

We should have picked our own cotton.

Here is the best way to pay reparations.

A line item on the 1040 tax form.

Make it voluntary. All former slave owners can now contribute to the fund that will make whole all the former slaves.

done.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.