Posted on 06/25/2019 11:08:22 AM PDT by Red Badger
BIG UPDATE: YouTube has REMOVED the video from their platform. The video is still available on this website page.
UPDATE 1: Congressman Louie Gohmert issued a statement, saying “Google should not be deciding whether content is important or trivial and they most assuredly should not be meddling in our election process. They need their immunity stripped…”
UPDATE 2: Google executive Jen Gennai RESPONDED to the video, saying, “I was having a casual chat with someone at a restaurant and used some imprecise language. Project Veritas got me. Well done.”
Insider: Google “is bent on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again.”
Google Head of Responsible Innovation Says Elizabeth Warren “misguided” on “breaking up Google”
Google Exec Says Don’t Break Us Up: “smaller companies don’t have the resources” to “prevent next Trump situation”
Insider Says PragerU And Dave Rubin Content Suppressed, Targeted As “Right-Wing”
LEAKED Documents Highlight “Machine Learning Fairness” and Google’s Practices to Make Search Results “fair and equitable” Documents Appear to Show “Editorial” Policies That Determine How Google Publishes News Insider: Google Violates “letter of the law” and “spirit of the law” on Section 230
(New York City) — Project Veritas has released a new report on Google which includes undercover video of a Senior Google Executive, leaked documents, and testimony from a Google insider. The report appears to show Google’s plans to affect the outcome of the 2020 elections and “prevent” the next “Trump situation.”
The report includes undercover footage of longtime Google employee and Head of Responsible Innovation, Jen Gennai saying:
“Elizabeth Warren is saying we should break up Google. And like, I love her but she’s very misguided, like that will not make it better it will make it worse, because all these smaller companies who don’t have the same resources that we do will be charged with preventing the next Trump situation, it’s like a small company cannot do that.”
Said Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe:
“This is the third tech insider who has bravely stepped forward to expose the secrets of Silicon Valley. These new documents, supported by undercover video, raise questions of Google’s neutrality and the role they see themselves fulfilling in the 2020 elections.”
Jen Gennai is the head of “Responsible Innovation” for Google, a sector that monitors and evaluates the responsible implementation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies. In the video, Gennai says Google has been working diligently to “prevent” the results of the 2016 election from repeating in 2020:
“We all got screwed over in 2016, again it wasn’t just us, it was, the people got screwed over, the news media got screwed over, like, everybody got screwed over so we’re rapidly been like, what happened there and how do we prevent it from happening again.”
“We’re also training our algorithms, like, if 2016 happened again, would we have, would the outcome be different?”
Google: Artificial Intelligence Is For A “fair and equitable” State
According to the insider, Machine Learning Fairness is one of the many tools Google uses to promote a political agenda. Documents leaked by a Google informant elaborate on Machine Learning Fairness and the “algorithmic unfairness” that AI product intervention aims to solve:
==================================================================
=============================================================
=============================================================
The insider showed Google search examples that show Machine Learning Fairness in action.
“The reason we launched our A.I. principles is because people were not putting that line in the sand, that they were not saying what’s fair and what’s equitable so we’re like, well we are a big company, we’re going to say it.” – Jen Gennai, Head Of Responsible Innovation, Google
The Google insider explained the impact of artificial intelligence and Machine Learning Fairness:
“They’re going to redefine a reality based on what they think is fair and based upon what they want, and what and is part of their agenda.”
Determining credible news and an editorial agenda. . .
Additional leaked documents detail how Google defines and prioritizes content from different news publishers and how its products feature that content. One document, called the “Fake News-letter” explains Google’s goal to have a “single point of truth” across their products.
VIDEO AND More at link.............
Scratch the surface and you will find these people are paid communist agents. I would not be surprised if the whole project was funded from Russian KGB or similar.
Watched it this morning.
Jen is 110% proglib nutcase.
.
And dangerous!............
Russia! Russia! Russia!
It's a data assault weapon!
A Collusionikov!
We gave them permission, just like we gave it to the educational powers.
They misused it and now we want to put the genie back in.
Everyone knew google years ago when they worked with the Chinese government to suppress and control
This is pure virtue signaling.
All we can do is campaign the good old fashioned way, at church, around tables, on doorsteps. Google can’t control that.
re: “Watched it this morning.
Jen is 110% proglib nutcase.”
I’m wondering if ANY of the nutcases on the Google staff have any inkling of history?
Two in the vid have deleted and/or locked their social media accounts.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/06/google-executives-go-into-hiding-and-delete-their-social-media-accounts-after-james-okeefes-latest-expose/
Thanks for posting.
Must see video.
Two in the vid have deleted and/or locked their social media accounts.
= = =
Did they really do it, or did Google AI preemptively do it?
I fear that they just may have a very good understanding of history.
I forget the context but I once mentioned the fact that over 2000 people had died in the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor to a Google Employee. He reacted with shock. He said he thought that only about 100 people had died, many of them civilians killed by unexploded AA shells. I suggested he Google it.
Was the whistleblower one of the people mentioned in that link? Did they dox the whistleblower?
Worked with a guy back in 1998 that had a BS in computer science. He had been taught in college that the US stopped bombing Viet Nam at the end of the war because "we ran out of bombs."
I was floored that they were that unaware of what actually was behind the halt.
.
No, the other 2 on hidden cam. I pray the whistleblower stays safe.
Ok thanks. I’ll pray for the whistleblower(s) safety as well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.