Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xxqqzz

The first point is irrelevant. The jury’s findings are based on witnesses who testified, not on the police report.

The second point is flat out false. The jury was presented testimony that Raimondo was egging the students on, handing out their flyers, etc.

The third point is ludicrous. The college and its students were falsely trying to paint Gibsons and its employees as racist; the evidence presented at trial pointed overwhelmingly to the contrary.

Suck it up, Oberlin. Learn something instead of putting your head in the sand. And PAY UP!


5 posted on 06/23/2019 6:41:57 PM PDT by TheConservator (All the blather about TrumpÂ’s violation of the law is simply a projection of their own lawlessness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TheConservator

Even the three blacks who were charged with theft and assault, admitted that Gibson’s was not being racist. So that charge is refuted by the perps themselves.


11 posted on 06/23/2019 6:49:14 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: TheConservator

Also, them standing behind the ‘free speech’ defense when the college is famous for banning anyone not to the left of Joseph Stalin politically - needs to be mentioned.


12 posted on 06/23/2019 6:50:09 PM PDT by John Milner (Marching for Peace is like breathing for food.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: TheConservator

And Oberlin’s liability insurer ain’t gonna cough up a dime.

Heh, heh.


50 posted on 06/24/2019 12:46:55 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson