Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservative Supreme Court justices reverse precedent on property rights cases
The Hill ^ | June 21, 2019

Posted on 06/21/2019 8:05:39 AM PDT by SMGFan

The Supreme Court on Friday ruled 5-4 to overturn a decades-old precedent on property rights, a decision that marks a victory for conservatives.

The previous 1985 ruling that found that an individual whose property is taken by a local government cannot file a federal suit under the Fifth Amendment until that challenge fails in state court.

But on Friday the justices ruled along ideological lines to reverse that precedent, finding that the requirement “imposes an unjustifiable burden,” conflicts with other similar rulings and “must be overruled.”

“A property owner has an actionable Fifth Amendment takings claim when the government takes his property without paying for it,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in the majority opinion.

“That does not mean that the government must provide compensation in advance of a taking or risk having its action invalidated: So long as the property owner has some way to obtain compensation after the fact, governments need not fear that courts will enjoin their activities,” Roberts continued.

But it does mean that the property owner has suffered a violation of his Fifth Amendment rights when the government takes his property without just compensation, and there may bring his claim in federal court.”

Conservative Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh joined Roberts on the majority decision.

Justices Elena Kagan, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor – the liberal members of the court – dissented.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: fifthamendment; kelo; lawsuit; propertyrights; robertscourt; scotus; takings; trumpscotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Thank you.
1 posted on 06/21/2019 8:05:39 AM PDT by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Does this reverse Kelo?

L


2 posted on 06/21/2019 8:07:54 AM PDT by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

How about that? John Roberts joined with the conservatives. The John Roberts who allegedly dislikes 5-4 decisions was on the majority in a 5-4 decision.


3 posted on 06/21/2019 8:08:21 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

I cannot quite make the connection but there seems to be some symmetry to their ruling on Fed and State double jeopardy and this ruling.


4 posted on 06/21/2019 8:11:51 AM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

This seems so obvious to me. More proof that Liberalism is tyranny.


5 posted on 06/21/2019 8:11:53 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Five votes for the People, four votes for a bigger, and more powerful Government. Perfect example of the philosophical breakout of the current Court.


6 posted on 06/21/2019 8:15:52 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

wrote the decision , too.


7 posted on 06/21/2019 8:19:35 AM PDT by SMGFan ("God love ya! What am I talking about")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Tyrants can read the Constitution? I’m shocked I tell you, shocked.


8 posted on 06/21/2019 8:19:38 AM PDT by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

RGB outvoted again. Now we wait for next Monday ( and Tuesday & Wednesday?)


9 posted on 06/21/2019 8:20:38 AM PDT by SMGFan ("God love ya! What am I talking about")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Freedoms ship just reduced listing and actually came back a degree or 2.


10 posted on 06/21/2019 8:22:41 AM PDT by ping jockey (The only difference between organized crime and D.C. is one is illegal and one isn't)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

More good news


11 posted on 06/21/2019 8:22:45 AM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety

I see it as getting bolder on overturning bad/incorrect precedent—which is a very good thing.


12 posted on 06/21/2019 8:22:48 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
The John Roberts who allegedly dislikes 5-4 decisions was on the majority in a 5-4 decision.

He's saving up his chits for the big decisions, abortion, immigration, Second Amendment...

13 posted on 06/21/2019 8:30:05 AM PDT by Fightin Whitey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreedomNotSafety

“I cannot quite make the connection but there seems to be some symmetry to their ruling on Fed and State double jeopardy and this ruling.”

Agreed.

Seems to follow that separate branches and levels of government have separate and unique laws and rules that can be violated.


14 posted on 06/21/2019 8:31:58 AM PDT by Macoozie (Handcuffs and Orange Jumpsuits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

I don’t think so, because Kelo did involve compensation. What was at issue there was whether government seizing (and compensating) property to use, not for direct public use (i.e. a road), but to give to a private developer so as to increase the economic value (i.e. the tax revenue) coming from that property, was a valid taking. The court decided that it was, i.e. that *anything that you own* could simply be taken from you and given to another, with compensation, if the other would put it to “better use” as determined by the government doing the taking. So much for the idea of property rights. Sandra Day O’Connor, IIRC, wrote a bitter dissent and then resigned from the court shortly after.


15 posted on 06/21/2019 8:35:09 AM PDT by coloradan (The US has become a banana republic, except without the bananas - or the republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Now to overrule the finding that the state via zoning and conservation laws can impair up to 90% of the value of a property without it being considered an Article V “taking” thus requiring compensation for the owner.


16 posted on 06/21/2019 8:35:53 AM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

How about that? John Roberts joined with the conservatives.

...

Will FReepers remember?


17 posted on 06/21/2019 8:38:26 AM PDT by Moonman62 (Facts are racist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Kelo was decided in 2005. It would be interesting to learn how this decision affected Kelo.


18 posted on 06/21/2019 8:40:17 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

How does this affect property taken by the federal government under the same circumstances?


19 posted on 06/21/2019 8:44:53 AM PDT by cbvanb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Question. How does this logic apply, if it has not been already to other Constitutional issues? So if a state violates the 5th I can go straight to the Fed bypassing state appeals. Does it work that way on the other amendments now? Will this ruling change that?


20 posted on 06/21/2019 8:48:03 AM PDT by FreedomNotSafety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson