Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Article image.

1 posted on 06/17/2019 7:35:06 AM PDT by fishtank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: fishtank

No research or evolutionary hoo-ha needed.

Its simple.

This is your corn hole.

This is your money hole.

Don’t get them mixed them up, no matter what.


2 posted on 06/17/2019 7:38:30 AM PDT by Candor7 ((Obama Fascism)http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Another “Faculty Lounge” gab fest.


3 posted on 06/17/2019 7:40:43 AM PDT by Don Corleone (Nothing makes the delusional more furious than truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

The only basis they have is their defiance and rebellion against nature. They claim to be “pro-science” when it comes to global warming, but are completely against real science, such as biology.


5 posted on 06/17/2019 8:03:07 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank
I imagine the early hominids had as many sexually confused individuals as we have today. Not many, but there would have been some, just as there are some among other species of animals.

The sexually confused, however, would have tended not to reproduce. People used to think this was important. The gender radicals, however, don't think reproduction is important at all.

They are not concerned with the Darwinian struggle for survival. They care only about the struggle for power. And they don't recognize that this obsession is itself a derangement.

6 posted on 06/17/2019 8:08:18 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

If homosexuality were normal, the human race would not have survived long enough to domesticate wheat.


7 posted on 06/17/2019 8:23:22 AM PDT by Chuckster (Probably not...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

Ping for entertainment.

5.56mm


9 posted on 06/17/2019 8:27:34 AM PDT by M Kehoe (DRAIN THE SWAMP! BUILD THE WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

The term “cisgender” was invented in 1955 by a “sexologist” but the general public only began hearing it in the late 90s.

And, get this! “Cisgender” is defined as “the opposite of transgender”!

To be clear, “cisgenger” is not synonymous with “heterosexual”.

A “cisgender” we are told, simply agrees with his or her biological Male- or Female-ness, IOW is not confused about what’s in their pants.

But a “cisgender” person can still be homosexual, i.e. same-sex *attracted*.

So, the transsexuals created & defined a new classification of hetero and even homosexual people, in terms reflective of how they define themselves.


12 posted on 06/17/2019 9:15:48 AM PDT by mumblypeg (I've seen the Future, brother. It is murder.. --L. Cohen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

Gender and sex have always have been separate. Gender is a grammatical classification of nouns and verbs that is minimal in English but thrives in German.


13 posted on 06/17/2019 9:28:23 AM PDT by arthurus (ht)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: fishtank

There are two genders, male and female, and that is it. The sex that nature provided cannot be changed. Liberals can give hormones and surgery, but it does not change a person’s sex. It cannot be changed. Do not tell Bruce Jenner!


16 posted on 06/17/2019 11:13:03 AM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson