Posted on 06/06/2019 12:06:58 PM PDT by Its All Over Except ...
The Mueller report appears to have been carefully worded by the lawyers working under former special counsel Robert Mueller, and perhaps Mueller himself, in a manner designed to inflict political damage on President Donald Trump. ...
We know that sections of the report were selectively edited to provide damaging portrayals.
... there are troubling and disturbing details surrounding a heavily used witness in the Mueller report, George Nader.
... access to the underlying material used in the Mueller report is extremely limited.
...documents released in the ongoing Flynn case, a rebuttal letter from the lawyers mentioned in the Mueller report, and details surrounding the Papadopoulos case - they highlight inconsistencies, therby raising concerns that Mueller's report may be hiding many more such problems.
Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) highlighted the Dowd transcript in a May 31 tweet, saying "... It's all a fraud."
...
(Excerpt) Read more at theepochtimes.com ...
Tons of information there.
Mueller has got lots of splainin’ to do...
Mueller should be subpoenaed by the Republicans in the Senate. Why has it not happened yet?
The Report is Political. The entire document should be questioned.
Senator Linda Graham was on Hannity a few days ago talking about
Mulehead. Graham said the case was closed. Could not believe Hannity
did not ask Linda if he was going to call Mulehead to testify in his Senate
Committee. Hannity avoided asking Linda. Could not believe it.
Hannity is a light-weight. Lots of talk - a trick he learned from his friend Bill O'Baxter.
MAYBE but... I think Hannity is on direct-dial terms with POTUS, and there may be other things going on. I have the impression Hannity and POTUS talk on the phone pretty frequently.
“The Mueller report notes that “On May 6, 2016, 10 days after that meeting with Mifsud, Papadopoulos suggested to a representative of a foreign government that the Trump Campaign had received indications from the Russian government that it could assist the Campaign through the anonymous release of information that would be damaging to Hillary Clinton.” Joseph Mifsud is a Maltese academic who told Papadopoulos that the Russians had dirt “in the form of thousands of Clinton emails.”
“Publicly available information has always shown that Papadopoulos met with Downer on May 10th—and both Downer and the Australian government appear to stand by this date.”
THAT IS IRONIC, GIVEN THAT PAPADOPOULOS WAS CONVICTED OF MISSTATING THAT DATE IN HIS INTERVIEW. MAYBE MUELLER SHOULD BE PROSECUTED FOR MISSTATING IT AS WELL?
Even more obvious
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3742993/posts
“I have the impression Hannity and POTUS talk on the phone pretty frequently.”
I think you’re correct.
Democrats are Lawless because Republicans AR ball-less.
Democrats are Lawless because Republicans AR ball-less.
Craziness. And the Dems are demanding release of all the background information. Imagine how much more will be uncovered.
The selective editing is pretty brash. Totally mischaracterized the nature of the conversations not just the attorney’s phone message but all the discussion about “Russian tapes”, too.
#5 has got to be totally humiliating. They cited this guy Nader 100 times, and all the while he’s been hiding child pornography. How could they not know he had been imprisoned for child porn in the past? Why would they rely on him, there is no way this would stay hidden from the public. And, it appears they knew he was still involved in it - they had his phones bugged the whole time, but only charged him now? It’s almost an act of self-sabotage on the part of Mueller.
It just proves Mueller is a tiny hateful being.
I see it differently.
Democrats are Lawless because the Media has their back.
Republicans are ball-less because they fear the Media.
Highly likely they knew, and used this as a lever to get what they wanted.
It may be being used, now, to insure he keeps the "correct" narrative going.
OK....Mine fits on a Bumper Sticker of a CAR.....yours needs a SEMI! :)
Hmmm... Not convinced. Not sure how his past convictions would be any leverage. The current charges could be. But he’s been charged anyway.
Maybe they thought this would be an embarrassment to Trump to be associated with Nader. But in my view its humiliating to Mueller that they would rely on him at all - and that they cited his name 100+ times in the report released in April when they knew at least 6 weeks earlier he would be charged for child porn.
That.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.