Skip to comments.
Judge rejects House Democrats' attempt to block border wall
CNN ^
| June 3, 2018
| Katelyn Polantz,
Posted on 06/03/2019 3:36:27 PM PDT by Innovative
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
To: kvanbrunt2
41
posted on
06/03/2019 6:49:11 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
( Frau Mueller? "What do the Clintons, Obama and their Spygate CIA/FBI/DOJ thugs have on you???????")
To: Innovative
So does this mean that Congress can still stop the wall, or did the judge say they could not?
To: Innovative
this is a mistake. We should not recognize judicial rulings in a national emergency situations. I have said that when the decision goes the other way and i say it again when it goes our way.
The congress is the check and balance in emergency declarations and the ED Act gives no role to the judiciary.
You cannot give 200 or so judges the power to stop the response to an emergency.
it is dangerous and rife for abuse of power by a non-elected official.
43
posted on
06/03/2019 7:53:07 PM PDT
by
morphing libertarian
( Use Comey's Report, Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
To: Innovative
44
posted on
06/03/2019 7:55:41 PM PDT
by
EdnaMode
To: All
Praise God (YHVH)! A judge who has courage and some actual knowledge of USConstitutional law.
45
posted on
06/03/2019 8:09:44 PM PDT
by
veracious
(UN=OIC=Islam ; USAgov may be radically changed, just amend USConstitution)
To: Innovative
Obviously a serious mixup on the part of the judge shopping committee.
46
posted on
06/03/2019 8:13:12 PM PDT
by
AustinBill
(consequence is what makes our choices real)
To: Innovative
HE'S GOOD LOOKING,TOO!
Also a former cop and deputy sheriff!
47
posted on
06/03/2019 8:14:13 PM PDT
by
onyx
To: Innovative
Exactly!
A sane judge saves the day.
48
posted on
06/03/2019 8:22:51 PM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Can I get a shout out for the person(s) who donated $2,000.00 from France? Thanks so much! Wow!)
To: Travis McGee
To: morphing libertarian
How is this a mistake? The judge ruled there is no standing, as Congress has other methods of their own to 'remedy' the situation. Also, he said this isn't an issue the courts should be involved in! What part of his ruling do you disagree with?
and also he does not believe the court should step into the fight between the President and Congress.
To: Svartalfiar
it is good ruling as I said. The problem is that it got onto the judiciary in the first place. Trump has deferred to judges too many times on immigration issues. Immigration has become national defense issue.
51
posted on
06/04/2019 8:58:43 AM PDT
by
morphing libertarian
( Use Comey's Report, Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
To: TrumpisRight
I was thinking the same thing. This is not Trump’s wall. It’s a wall for all Americans, to protect us from those seeking to illegally enter our country.
52
posted on
06/04/2019 2:55:02 PM PDT
by
Theo
(FReeping since 1998 ... drain the swamp.)
To: Innovative
With a circuit court of appeals, a fully impaneled circuit court of appeals, and SCOTUS. Will there be an interim injunction, pending these appeals?
53
posted on
06/04/2019 6:14:27 PM PDT
by
Eleutheria5
(If you are not prepared to use force to defend civilization, then be prepared to accept barbarism.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-53 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson