Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pentagon sends stern message to White House over USS John McCain debacle
The Blaze ^ | June 2nd 2019 | Chris Enloe

Posted on 06/02/2019 1:46:13 PM PDT by Ennis85

The Pentagon sent a stern message to the White House over the weekend after it was confirmed officials directed the United States Navy to minimize the presence of the USS John McCain during President Donald Trump's recent visit to Japan.

What did the Pentagon say?

Acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan directed his staff over the weekend to reaffirm that the U.S. military will not be "politicized," Reuters reported.

"Secretary Shanahan directed his chief of staff to speak with the White House military office and reaffirm his mandate that the Department of Defense will not be politicized," Pentagon spokesman Lt. Colonel Joe Buccino said. "The chief of staff reported that he did reinforce this message."

While traveling to Seoul on Sunday, Shanahan reaffirmed his message to reporters accompanying him on the trip.

"There is no room for politicizing the military," Shanahan said.

What is the background?

On Saturday, the U.S. Navy confirmed the White House requested the USS John McCain be moved during Trump's visit to Japan, NBC News reported.

"A request was made to the U.S. Navy to minimize the visibility of USS John S. McCain, however, all ships remained in their normal configuration during the President's visit," Rear Admiral Charlie Brown, chief of information, told NBC.

According to Reuters, the request originated in the White House military office. Apparently, staffers believed the optics would not be good for the president since McCain was one of his biggest political rivals.

However, as Brown confirmed, senior Navy leadership refused comply with the request.

What is the White House saying?

On Sunday, White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney downplayed the incident, calling the request "not ... unreasonable."

https://twitter.com/MeetThePress/status/1135176786873081857?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1135176786873081857%7Ctwgr%5E393039363b636f6e74726f6c&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theblaze.com%2Fres%2Fcommunity%2Ftwitter_embed%2F%3Fiframe_id%3Dtwitter-embed-1135176786873081857%26created_ts%3D1559482211.0%26screen_name%3DMeetThePress%26text%3DWATCH%253A%2BActing%2BWhite%2BHouse%2BChief%2Bof%2BStaff%2BMick%2BMulvaney%2Btells%2BChuck%2BTodd%2Bthat%2Bmoving%2Ba%2BNavy%2Bship%2Bout%2Bof%2Bsight%2Bfrom%2Bt%25E2%2580%25A6%2Bhttps%253A%252F%252Ft.co%252FW5ZvDSw0DM%26id%3D1135176786873081857%26name%3DMeet%2Bthe%2BPress


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fake; johnmccain; navy; pentagon; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 last
To: TigersEye

Not quite. I don’t have time to see all of the negatives about Senor McCain. I still have my bias though. Wow, that is a lot of red ink on the page.


101 posted on 06/02/2019 7:33:50 PM PDT by BatGuano (Ya don't think I'd go into combat with loose change in my pocket, do Ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: apillar

I think Trump has said he didn’t ask for it so the “stern warning” was sent to bureaucrats in the white house who take it on themselves to turn the military into props. I think the pentagon sending that message is not inappropriate frankly and based on his comments I think that the President agrees with the sentiment.


102 posted on 06/02/2019 7:43:07 PM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ennis85

Is the Pentagon going to fire the President?


103 posted on 06/02/2019 7:44:29 PM PDT by Radix (Natural Born Citizens have Citizen parents)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist

Named after McCain’s father and grandfather, both were 4 star Admirals!

McCain III was an asshole - thought his 4 star daddy and granddaddy would be able to grease his skids, and to a degree, they did!

McCain III dishonored his name, the US Navy and the US Senate!


104 posted on 06/02/2019 8:21:22 PM PDT by Taxman (We will never be a truly free people so long as we have the income tax and the IRS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Missouri gal

Presidents get capital ships like carriers. Not destroyers named after them.


105 posted on 06/02/2019 8:54:40 PM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter

The ship was named for John Sidney “Sloosh” McCaine an Admiral during WW-2 and Admiral Halley’s second in command. Not his dumbass spoiled brat of a grandson.


106 posted on 06/03/2019 1:16:31 AM PDT by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: miliantnutcase

What can it be changed to? And if it can’t be formally changed, what is a good nickname? USS Pretender, maybe?


107 posted on 06/03/2019 9:38:15 AM PDT by Missouri gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Missouri gal

Good one ;-)


108 posted on 06/03/2019 11:37:04 AM PDT by miliantnutcase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

Nah, don’t scrap it. Get a skeleton crew of robots to sail it into Iranian waters and after the towel heads sink it, we have our excuse to light them up with some real throw weight.


109 posted on 06/03/2019 11:45:14 AM PDT by VietVet876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Really should not matter. McCain and Trump are both Republicans. How can politics be an issue to the Pentagon ? They have to take thinks at legal and face value. They have failed. This was just one Republucan arranging his Republican ships. This means we have potential Castro’s in this military.


110 posted on 06/03/2019 12:01:04 PM PDT by justa-hairyape (The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: BatGuano
All the negatives? Not even close. I'm not the only one to compile links to his treachery or even the first one. Here's Mr. Chips collection that I copied before FR archives expired on his original post.

Some of them are links to the same stories I linked to, most are not.

111 posted on 06/03/2019 2:26:33 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: justa-hairyape
This was just one Republucan arranging his Republican ships.

That's not what Trump says about it and I'll take his word.

112 posted on 06/03/2019 2:28:22 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-112 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson