Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maine House rejects move to change Electoral College system
Press Herald ^ | May 30, 2019

Posted on 05/30/2019 3:13:39 PM PDT by SMGFan

AUGUSTA —The Maine House rejected a bill Thursday that would have Maine join a compact of states pledging to award their Electoral College votes to the winner of the national popular vote during presidential elections.

The 66-76 vote against the measure comes two weeks after the Senate agreed to add Maine to a growing number of states aiming to elect presidents by popular vote.

The Senate voted, 19-16 to have Maine join an interstate compact in which participating states agree to award their Electoral College votes to the presidential candidate who receives the most votes nationwide.

(Excerpt) Read more at pressherald.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: electoralcollege; maine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
NPV has stalled out.
1 posted on 05/30/2019 3:13:39 PM PDT by SMGFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Dummycrats are greatly saddened.


2 posted on 05/30/2019 3:16:43 PM PDT by grobdriver (BUILD KATE'S WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Voters in these NPV states should be storming their capitols with rope, tar snd pitchforks.


3 posted on 05/30/2019 3:18:31 PM PDT by ex91B10 (Powered by the Penguin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

If Democrats can get that many EVs by NPV, they should be able to just win the election, doncha think?


4 posted on 05/30/2019 3:18:45 PM PDT by Timmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ex91B10

“Voters in these NPV states should be storming their capitols with rope, tar snd pitchforks.”

Just the rope will do.


5 posted on 05/30/2019 3:22:38 PM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ex91B10

The NPV states tend to be liberal states , whose voters are in favor of this twisting of election procedures to get a Democrat president.


6 posted on 05/30/2019 3:23:14 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Yep, Nevada’s Dem Governor vetoed their bill authorizing the change and Maine’s House rejects it as well.

Probably going to be stuck at 189 EV for some time, maybe forever. Likely end up about like the Equal Rights Ammendment.


7 posted on 05/30/2019 3:25:32 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker

How about just not vote for buffoons come election time!


8 posted on 05/30/2019 3:25:45 PM PDT by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ex91B10

If the Democrats want this , run on it in 2020 for state races. Also the control of redistricting in 2021 - 22.


9 posted on 05/30/2019 3:27:15 PM PDT by SMGFan ("God love ya! What am I talking about")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

EV wise in 2020 Democrats are 188 Solid...22 “likely”

How can they get to 270.


10 posted on 05/30/2019 3:30:14 PM PDT by SMGFan ("God love ya! What am I talking about")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

Somebody must be educating them on just what would happen to smaller states if this wild scheme is adopted.

No body would be campaigning in New England for one.

All these quaint town meetings in various small towns would no longer happen since the the Democrats can count on New York and California to put them over based on popular vote.


11 posted on 05/30/2019 3:36:28 PM PDT by CIB-173RDABN (I am not an expert in anything, and my opinion is just that, an opinion. I may be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

On the surface this seems to be unconstitutional as it can disenfranchise the states voters.


12 posted on 05/30/2019 3:38:02 PM PDT by newfreep ("INSIDE EVERY PROGRESSIVE IS A TOTALITARIAN SCREAMING TO GET OUT" - DAVID HOROWITZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan
to have Maine join an interstate compact in which ...

Glad they are calling it what it actually is.

No State shall... enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State... [Article 1 Section 10]

13 posted on 05/30/2019 3:41:01 PM PDT by C210N (You can vote your way into Socialism; but, you have to shoot your way out of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CIB-173RDABN

All these quaint town meetings in various small towns would no longer happen


That’s what the founders figured. Hence, the EC.
Any marginally populated state to reject the EC hurts itself.


14 posted on 05/30/2019 3:44:49 PM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan
The 66-76 vote

What, is every Maine resident a member of state assembly?

15 posted on 05/30/2019 3:48:58 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

The 2020 Election is going to be a mess ,just the way the Dems want it


16 posted on 05/30/2019 3:49:44 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6; SMGFan

I didn’t know the NV gov vetoed it. It was reported he was expected to sign it. It’s a really bad idea in so many ways, assuming it would get enough states and pass Constitutional muster.


17 posted on 05/30/2019 3:53:45 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

Well what do you know? A Dem governor and Maine’s Dem House rejected it? Wow, words escape me!


18 posted on 05/30/2019 3:55:43 PM PDT by ducttape45 ("Righteousness exalteth a nation; but sin is a reproach to any people." Proverbs 14:34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SMGFan

At least the people in Maine are too smart to hand their votes over to California and New York......


19 posted on 05/30/2019 4:08:44 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

I believe that the founding fathers didn’t think the EC would decide the winner all too often. They expected that the states would each run their own candidates or in small coalitions, but that it would fragment among 3 or more candidates so that no single person would get enough electors. They expected the POTUS would mostly be chosen by the House. But as it turns out, after President Washington, we traded their state factionalism in for party factionalism. AFAIK only 2 POTUS’ were chosen by the House.

If you ask me, the party system is the root of most of our governmental problems. The 17th Amendment was sold by the left as a way to give more power to the people (and I’ll admit the statehouse sausage making process to select a Senator was probably very ugly)... but it was a ploy to strip the states of their power and give it to the party bosses eg Tammany Hall and Mayor Daley.


20 posted on 05/30/2019 4:09:21 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson