| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
|
Locked on 05/30/2019 5:47:18 PM PDT by Jim Robinson, reason:
childishness |
Posted on 05/28/2019 7:30:03 AM PDT by Para-Ord.45
Show me these mysterious sealed indictments with names attached.
What is your reaction to 90k in one year compared to an average of 1k a year? Do you have an opinion on that?
Or just lash out illogically. Your opinion is irrelevant, really. What is happening is happening, no matter how bit a tantrum you throw.
If it doesn’t rain today does that prove it won’t rain tommorow, asking for a friend?
Lol...
Meanwhile in the real world
Clapper throwing Obama under the bus
“I’m alluding now to the President’s (TRUMP) criticism of President Obama for all that he did or didn’t do before he left office with respect to the Russian meddling. If it weren’t for President Obama, we might not have done the intelligence community assessment that we did that set off a whole sequence of events which are still unfolding today, notably, special counsel Mueller’s investigation,” Clapper said Wednesday on CNN.
You’re lazy.
PACER reveals there are proceedings as well as indictments.
Sealed indictments are routine legal procedure as are warrants which are also sealed.. You`d know that if you had an inkling of basic legal procedures.
Federal Judicial Center- 80% of sealed cases based on warrant applications or tracking devices.
Lol basic legal procedures?
Says the dolt demanding people break the law and leak info cause HE doesn’t know what is happening
Hahahahahahaha priceless
Search PACER.
Research.
Do your own homework.
Never take what anyone says at face value.
"On Feb. 2, 2019, Acting Attorney General Mike Whitaker testified before Congress that Huber and others are part of ongoing investigations as we've previously been told. Whitaker Confirms Horowitz/Huber Investigations."
Department of Justice Hearing On Russia and Mueller Investigation
This is a video of Congressional (House Judiciary Committee) testimony by then Acting Attorney General Whitaker.
Whitaker confirms that both Horowitz and Huber are investigating and/or reviewing "matters" of which you are concerned.
Don't get bogged down in the difference between "review" and "investigation". They mean the same thing.
If crimes are discovered during a "review", recommendations for indictments will come down. Are you going to now say that Barr will ignore any such recommendations/referrals?
How deep does your denial go?
Aren’t I the one that pointed out that you’ve posted the same article several times written by the same author?
Don’t worry about my homework and research...
Sorry to say... ANYTHING connected to Jeff Sessions when he was Attorney General has been “Nothing Burger Deluxe.”
Looks like DonkeyHumper used the long weekend to bring out all of his personalities to play with.
#moresoisauceplease
How many people were indicted for the Hillary Scam Email & Obstruction Investigation? Horowitz whitewashed his report stating clearly that no one in the Justice department was bias in their investigation. There might have had a tinsy bit of personal bias, but they were 100% professional.
Next there is nothing stopping Horowitz from recommending indictments during the current investigation. He does not need to wait until the report is completed before making referrals. In fact he is obligated to make a referral when he finds out a crime has been committed. The two year long report is a few weeks away and he has not referred anyone.
In this thread I read the most stupidest suggestion ever. Huber doesn’t need to interview Key Witnesses because the spoke to congress and committed perjury. Ha, ha.
Members of congress have submitted referrals for indictments that cover dozens of people. Not one arrest.
You’re lazy.
You finally said something truthful. I'm hella lazy.
But my lazy ass has seen printouts of the sealed indictment lists. Several of them, matter of fact. Posted by people who have access to Pacer (which I don't).
I don't recall seeing any names attached to the "sealed" indictments or warrants.
You made the statement that there were 30k indictments filed, and then updated it to 90k. You really have no idea how many there are or what they contain, do you. Yet you flap your gums. You're just blowing smoke and pretending to be knowledgeable, right?
Just because there maybe over 90k federal indictments does not imply in any way they are related to the coup attempt.
This is a valid point. Neither you or I know what those sealed indictments contain or their subject. Yet you are SURE that not one of them is related to and derp state skullduggery.
Why? What secret knowledge do you have? The fact that there are 90k when they yearly average was 1k before doesn't seem to phase you and you fail to address that issue. Why?
PACER reveals there are proceedings as well as indictments.
Thank you, Perry Mason.
Sealed indictments are routine legal procedure as are warrants which are also sealed
Yep. And they don't have a name attached for public (or suspect) consumption, now do they? Yet you know what they are NOT.
You`d know that if you had an inkling of basic legal procedures.
Says the guy who KNOWS what the SEALED indictments DON'T pertain to.
Federal Judicial Center- 80% of sealed cases based on warrant applications or tracking devices.
Okay. Let's say that's true for the sake of argument. I don't have an inkling of math skills either, but 20% of 90k seems like a much larger number than 20% of 1k. Help me out with the math. I'm lazy.
Explain the discrepencies. Since you seem to be the legal expert with secret knowledge.
Anyway. We had this same argument over a year ago, right? Since then, lots has happened. Lots that we were told was going to happen. Lots that you are now aware of.
And still cling to the "nothing's happening" meme?
I don't get you, pear.
Mr Trump there are a bunch of stupid trolls (and Jeb fans lol) here can you please explain why you waited two years till after the Mueller report to declassify this damning information about the crimes committed against you?
“I do, I have plans to declassify and release. I have plans to absolutely release,” Trump said. “I have some very talented people working for me, lawyers, and they really didn’t want me to do it early on. ... A lot of people wanted me to do it a long time ago. I’m glad I didn’t do it. We got a great result without having to do it, but we will. One of the reasons that my lawyers didn’t want me to do it, is they said, if I do it, they’ll call it a form of obstruction.”
Trump added: “Frankly, thought it would be better if we held it to the end. But at the right time, we will be absolutely releasing.”
Can't argue with that fact.
You win.
The multiple investigations (Horowitz, Huber, Durham) are all a big hoax and designed to placate us poor saps who dare to believe.
Everybody's a derp stater playing us (and Trump) for chumps. Unless you believe that Trump is playing us too.
Which is it? Trump's a chump like us or he's in on the gag and is chumping us too?
Help me to understand.
It's why I come to these "woe is me" threads. Cause you guys have all the answers.
*rolls eyes*
The sleeper cult grows smaller by the day.
Pretty much just a core set of zealots now.
#HardcoreDeniers
#TooProudToSee
But, let’s not taint FreeRepublic with anything that could change it from what it used to be...in 1998.
#changeisbad
#hehhehhehisaidtaint
#taintoneortother
#thoughtfascismisstillfascism
“FYI. You’re an anonymous poster on the internet.”
Yep, and anyone who would believe me if I told them to trust Obama appointees to investigate the wrongdoings of other Obama appointees, would be a moron.
“You mean like Obama appointees admiral Mike Rogers or General Flynn?”
Yep. Wouldn’t trust them either to investigate Obama appointees.
“PS how come none of your “your sources” knew about the McCabe grand jury until it was ANNOUNCED?”
What “sources”? I don’t pretend to have secret sources that give me inside info, because I’m not a con artist.
So true.
Because nothing has changed with a Trump Presidency.
*rolls eyes again*
To be honest you are just trolling. You have to admit as it stands right now, we have every right to be skeptical. Being skeptical, does not mean we lost all faith. However...
Horowitz failed us completely in his last report. It was a disgusting whitewash.
Huber has not produced one indictment and all evidence points to him not impaneling a Grand Jury to even get one. Not one person has claimed to even be interviewed by him.
Even with a new FBI Director the agency is still withholding damaging materials, not sources and methods. If it looks bad, redact.
None of the criminal referrals (provable perjury charges) presented by congress to the DOJ has resulted in an arrest. In fact there is not one arrest in all this nonsense as of yet.
Mueller not only committed crimes (when did he know there was no collusion, the start of his investigation). When did he know about the false FISA documents. Barr will not go after Mueller, his best friend and their wifes fellow Sunday school teachers.
Everyone on the planet knows Comey broke the law by releasing the memos. He still walking free and on every talk show calling the president a traitor.
So, are we going to believe our lying eyes or you? We will turn around quickly once something happens, if anything happens.
Huber wasn’t assigned to do any further investigating. He was assigned to review what had been done and make recommendations as to what he concluded still needed to be done. Here is the authorization letter from Sessions:
https://www.americanoversight.org/document/doj-letter-from-jeff-sessions
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.