Replies

This article is breathtakingly stupid.

Christopher Steele says the Russians gave him all his info.
But everything he says is suspect, his document is full of BS that would have taken him minimal checking to know it’s absurd. If he didn’t make most of it up himself, which I think is likely.

EVEN THIS AUTHOR says everything Christopher Steele says is suspect, look at this quote:

“those notes also demonstrate Steele failing to keep his story straight between the State Department and FBI, proving how unreliable he is.”

But somehow his claim about who is sources are is pure golden fact because... why?

Then this author excitely talks about how a government employee and government employee confirm the sources — but THEIR only source was an interview with Christopher Steele!

And the author excitely says wow the sources name keeps popping up all over the place! From christopher steele, an interview with Christopher Steele, and a document transcribing the interview with christopher steele.
Face palm. Journalistic malpractice.

This article is breathtakingly stupid.

Anyone who can't see by now the many areas in which the Russians were involved in this scam to help get Hillary elected is beyond "breathtakingly stupid".

April 26, 2019...

Trump: Clinton-Ukraine collusion allegations 'big' and 'incredible,' will be reviewed...

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-barr-will-look-at-incredible-possibility-of-ukraine-clinton-collusion
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Image result for Burisma

[RT (Russia Today) is a Russia state-owned and controlled propaganda media outlet -ETL]

From The Daily Caller, May 5, 2019

* Hunter Biden was appointed to the board of directors of a Ukranian company [Burisma] as part of an effort to recruit well-connected Americans while the company was under investigation, according to The New York Times.

* Then-Vice President Joe Biden played a role in pressuring Ukraine to oust the country’s top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, who was investigating the company, Burisma.

* Shokin’s successor initially ended the investigation into Burisma, but decided in March 2019 to reopen it.

https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/05/biden-ukraine-burisma-trump/

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

From 2014...

The Federalist
May 13, 2014
Mollie Hemingway

"In late April, around the time the vice president made an official trip to Ukraine, Burisma allegedly appointed Devon Archer, one of Hunter Biden’s business partners, to its board as well.

Here’s a brief write-up on the story from the Moscow Times, an English-language news service based in Russia.

These dual announcements raise more questions than they answer. The prominence of the individuals involved — Hunter Biden is the vice president’s son, while Devon Archer was a major bundler for John Kerry and also his stepson’s college roommate

https://thefederalist.com/2014/05/13/9-questions-to-ask-about-bidens-work-with-a-gas-company-in-ukraine/

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Mykola Zlochevsky

Same article, Daily Caller, May 5, 2019

“Burisma is a natural gas exploration and production company owned by Mykola Zlochevsky, a cabinet member of former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovich. [Viktor Yanukovich was Putin’s stooge in the Ukraine -ETL].

Yanukovich was removed from his position in February 2014.

He currently lives in exile in Russia and is wanted by Ukraine for high treason.

Zlochevsky later fled the country in late-2014 as Ukrainian prosecutors launched investigations into his time in public office as well as his private businesses.”

https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/05/biden-ukraine-burisma-trump/

__________________________________________________________________________________________

Image result for Manafort Viktor Yanukovych
Viktor Yanukovych (Party of Regions), Putin's stooge in the Ukraine -ETL]

__________________________________________________________________________________________

Viktor Yanukovych vs Viktor Yushchenko

In 2004, as President Kuchma's term came to an end, [Viktor] Yushchenko announced his candidacy for president as an independent.

His major rival was Prime Minister Viktor Yanukovych. ..."

The campaign was often bitter and violent.

Yushchenko became seriously ill in early September 2004.

He was flown to Vienna’s Rudolfinerhaus clinic for treatment and diagnosed with acute pancreatitis, accompanied by interstitial edematous changes, due to a serious viral infection and chemical substances that are not normally found in food products.

Yushchenko claimed that he had been poisoned by government agents.

After the illness, his face was greatly disfigured: jaundiced, bloated, and pockmarked.

British toxicologist Professor John Henry of St Mary’s Hospital in London declared the changes in Yushchenko’s face were due to chloracne, which results from dioxin poisoning.[17]

Dutch toxicologist Bram Brouwer also stated his changes in appearance were the result of chloracne, and found dioxin levels in Yushchenko’s blood 6,000 times above normal.[18]

On December 11, Dr. Michael Zimpfer of the Rudolfinerhaus clinic declared that Yushchenko had ingested TCDD dioxin and had 1,000 times the usual concentration in his body.[19]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Yushchenko#TCDD_poisoning

_________________________________________________________

Yushchenko, hero of Ukraine's Orange Revolution warns Europe that Putin won't stop at Crimea

by Matthew Schofield - McClatchy Foreign Staff
March 27, 2014

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
Viktor Yushchenko

Many Ukrainians believe you need look no further than the face of Viktor Yushchenko to understand Russia's aggression against Ukraine.

Once smooth and ruggedly handsome, it still bears the scars from an assassination attempt when someone slipped dioxin into Yushchenko's food. ..."

________________________________________________________________

Your "logic" is breathtakingly "inadequate!"

With your construction, you're trying to use Steele's lack of credibility to disprove everything he says.

With the same construction, you might as well prove the sun doesn't rise in the east!

Sorry, bub, Steele is almost certainly not credible--that's correct--but as any liar knows, to be believable at the crucial moment, it has the best chance of working if you're perceived as credible as possible leading up to any big lie.

Both Steele and his "source E" parlayed off their supposed high levels of credibility.

Just because the lacking-in-credibility Steele said something doesn't make it wrong any more than it makes it right.