Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FISA: Motion Filed, John Solomon - Public Trust in Justice
Southeastern Legal Foundation ^ | May 22, 2019 | Southeastern Legal Foundation

Posted on 05/22/2019 6:19:42 PM PDT by Cboldt

WASHINGTON, DC: Southeastern Legal Foundation filed a Motion for Publication of Records with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) on behalf of award-winning investigative reporter John Solomon and itself, seeking rulings, orders and opinions issued by the Court finding any of the attorneys associated with the Carter Page FISA applications violated rules of the Court or rules governing professional conduct by attorneys.

Southeastern Legal Foundation successfully pursued Bar sanctions against sitting President Bill Clinton, ultimately resulting in the surrender of his law license on the last day in office and disbarment by the U.S. Supreme Court (1998-2001) as part of the Agreed Order of Discipline from Independent Counsel Robert Ray. Click here for more information on the Clinton matter.

"We face a serious crisis of public confidence in our judicial system. Our nation's highest law enforcement officers and government attorneys are suspected of lying, misleading and withholding information from the FISC in order to obtain permission to conduct surveillance on U.S. citizen Carter Page," said Todd Young, SLF executive director. "If true, even in part, one of the most profound ways to help re-establish public trust in the rule of law is to hold these attorneys professionally and publicly accountable for their alleged grievous violations of the law and public trust."

Click here for FISC Motion for Publication of Records filed by SLF (file stamped copy as soon as available)


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: fisagate; johnsolomon; thehill; thehillary; theshill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last
To: lodi90

He may have been supervising, and following Barry’s orders.


21 posted on 05/22/2019 6:47:37 PM PDT by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches, and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

They could have fit a little more into that “sentence”.


22 posted on 05/22/2019 6:48:12 PM PDT by CTyank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

“Eschew surplusage.”

Mark Twain


23 posted on 05/22/2019 6:52:18 PM PDT by CTyank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
I have no affinity for Roberts, but there is no way he can oversee FISC and do SCOTUS both. Too much workload. The system spreads people thin.

I can think of one way to lighten the load - shut down the FISC entirely. It appears to be an unconstitutional star chamber at this point, so it has no right to exist.

24 posted on 05/22/2019 6:56:36 PM PDT by Major Matt Mason (Will the Democrats now accept the results of the 2016 election?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: lodi90
Oh, there is a FISC appeals level too. The United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review. Not prolific, but not inactive either. My personal opinion is all this apparatus is for public and academic show - it has no material affect.
25 posted on 05/22/2019 6:57:28 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

I agree it’s ridiculous Roberts is suppose to supervise that court. But where was he when Lindsay Graham and the rest were jamming through Congress reapproval of the court? He is the one that needed to pump the breaks there and he was AWOL. I have a real hard time imagining Roberts being so hands off had it had been a Bush being assaulted by a fraudulent FISA warrant produced by a Democrat admin. The bottom line here is the GOPe has no interest in substantively supporting POTUS. It’s that simple.


26 posted on 05/22/2019 6:59:52 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Major Matt Mason

I’d shut it down too. It does not “drag” unconstitutional snooping, it enables it. Dump the system, it exists only to dupe a gullible public. Go back to the 1970’s, illegal snooping goes on as always, and the government seeks court approval to the extent the government fears suppression of evidence.


27 posted on 05/22/2019 7:00:14 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

All of them are in favor of their own system. They all tell us how great they are. Don’t expect critical self-exam from anybody in the FedGov. The so called “check and balance” is actually mutual support and “catch you if you fall.”


28 posted on 05/22/2019 7:02:47 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Major Matt Mason

I can think of one way to lighten the load - shut down the FISC entirely. It appears to be an unconstitutional star chamber at this point, so it has no right to exist.


Instead the beltway swampers jammed through Congress reapproval of the FISC in bipartisan manner. Fully knowing that the obama admin had abused the FISA system massively and it was time to pump the breaks and take a look at the system. Disgraceful. Downright Treasonous.


29 posted on 05/22/2019 7:03:32 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

How about a Cuban Breeze? I would, but I’m not Gretchen.


30 posted on 05/22/2019 7:04:15 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

At the very least I would enjoy hearing some reaction ofanger from CJ Roberts concerning abuse of the FISA court system, which reports to him.


31 posted on 05/22/2019 7:11:35 PM PDT by truth_seeker ( ^^\/**|_|**\/ ^^^^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lodi90
-- Fully knowing that the obama admin had abused the FISA system massively and it was time to pump the breaks and take a look at the system. --

That conflates "the tool" with "abuse of the tool." Mind you, I think the tool itself is useless, but it is theoretically possible the useless tool be used honestly.

The paradigm shift I'd loike to see is the presumtion relating to the government. The government asserts it is entitled to a presumption of honesty and integrity. I disagree, emphatically. The government has demonstrated over a long period of time that it is dishonest and corrupt.

32 posted on 05/22/2019 7:11:52 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt; Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; ...

pingpingping!


33 posted on 05/22/2019 7:12:47 PM PDT by bitt (The pain IS coming!!!'>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker
-- At the very least I would enjoy hearing some reaction of anger from CJ Roberts ... --

I would find it insincere. This is the guy who says "there are no politics in judges" and thought the public would buy it. He and Wray are cut from the same mold.

He can say what he wants. I think he's not suited for the job, period.

None of the outrage they express results in meaningful change. Nothing but feelgood.

34 posted on 05/22/2019 7:16:13 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

“Not a lamp post high enough.”

Odd Kamala Harris was pushing anti-swingingfromalamppost legislation?


35 posted on 05/22/2019 7:22:59 PM PDT by Eddie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bitt

HAMMER TIME!

36 posted on 05/22/2019 7:28:50 PM PDT by bitt (The pain IS coming!!!'>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

Nor enough of them.


37 posted on 05/22/2019 9:24:12 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

I guess it’s hard to supervise your buddies when you’re all in agreement.

The lingering questions...

Did the FISC Judges know what was going on and go along with it, thinking that nothing would ever happen to them nor would anyone ever find out about their corruption, given the secrecy surrounding their work?

OR

Like any other judge in the US, from the lowest level to SCOTUS, did they only make their decisions based on what they were told by the FBI and US Attorney? They can only go on what they know, so back to question 1.

Any decision they make can be based on lies. They have no idea of knowing the information that was provided was legitimate, until way down the road.

I tend to think that they were aware of what was going on, given that they’ve remained silent on all the lies they were fed and haven’t brought disciplinary actions against any of them. That is kind of telling.


38 posted on 05/22/2019 9:31:40 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

One would think that at this level, oversight, is more administrative and day-to-day.

“Hey, this is Justice Roberts. How’s everything going with you folks? Good. Ok. Call me if you need anything”.

He’s not reviewing the cases, their decisions and asking questions.

Possibly, at one point and time in history, judges were honest, hardworking and unbiased. That time is long gone. The entire system is so corrupted that we need a legitimate reset.


39 posted on 05/22/2019 9:38:03 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt

“...in order to obtain permission to conduct surveillance on U.S. citizen Carter Page,”

Why no mention of the two hop rule (outward from Page)? That allowed them to spy on (I’ll bet) hundreds of people.


40 posted on 05/22/2019 11:18:18 PM PDT by JohnnyP (Thinking is hard work (I stole that from Rush).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson