[LouAvul]

If intellectual and academic integrity were ever demanded, it would be in the field of Creation Science.

I've debated atheists before. They long ago decided to reject any notion of a Supreme Being because to accept such would demand they submit themselves to a Power higher than themselves.

That, they aren't going to do. As a result, they have no choice but to accept the alternative, regardless how preposterous. That's atheistic evolution. Preposterous.

[QBFimi]

.. [Atheists] long ago decided to reject any notion of a Supreme Being because to accept such would demand they submit themselves to a Power higher than themselves.

Yup, and the urban ferals are the fruits of their labors:

https://www.prageru.com/video/why-god-is-a-he/

[IrishBrigade]

‘They long ago decided to reject any notion of a Supreme Being because to accept such would demand they submit themselves to a Power higher than themselves.’

nonsense; maybe, just maybe, they find the concept of an uncaused, non temporal, and non spatial entity spinning multiverses and fretting about everyone’s personal issues a bit much to accept...?

[alexander_busek]

They long ago decided to reject any notion of a Supreme Being because to accept such would demand they submit themselves to a Power higher than themselves form an opinion despite there being insufficient evidence.

And no, I don't have to propose an alternative explanation; a mere "I don't know / I have yet to be presented with sufficiently convincing evidence" is an entirely appropriate response.

Regards,