Roger Stone Asks for Evidence Russians Hacked DNC Server – Court Won’t Provide It Because They Don’t

GATEWAY PUNDIT ^ | 5/11/2019 | Jim Hoft

[bitt]

Roger Stone is requesting proof that the Russians hacked tehe DNC server, as was reported in the Mueller report. He claims if the Russians didn’t hack the DNC, his case should be dismissed. The problem for the Mueller team is that they and the FBI have never reportedly actually looked at the server.

Roger Stone and his legal team are requesting the report from Crowdstrike, the firm connected with the Deep State who reportedly did inspect the DNC server after emails were released by WikiLeaks.

...

[bitt]

Roger Stone Asks for Evidence Russians Hacked DNC Server – Court Won’t Provide It Because They Don’t Have the Proof

[bitt]

p

[E. Pluribus Unum]

https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3748647/posts

[PA Engineer]

The DNC server narrative is the weakest link in the ongoing coup chain. TFTP. BTTT.

[hoosiermama]

Looks like attention is being brought to the lack of varification of hacking of server by Russia. That information will then be used as evidence in other cases.
In steps JA and the 400 plus communication between he and SR.
Eventually
Motive for murder will be established.

[Telepathic Intruder]

The Inquisition doesn’t care about evidence. If their eye is upon you, that’s reason enough for your guilt.

[Lurkinanloomin]

Seth Rich is still dead......

[Lurkinanloomin]

Seth Rich is still not Russian......

[17th Miss Regt]

We don’t need no stinkin’ proof!

[Lurkinanloomin]

Seth Rich is the source of the Wikileaks DNC emails.

[InterceptPoint]

I have read quite a bit about the supposed Russian hack of the DNC server.

Color me skeptical.

There is a lot of info and analysis out there in Google Land that puts the Russian Theory in doubt. That in addition to the obvious fact that pointing to the Russians offered an irresistible story to tell if you were in the business of denying Trump the Presidency. Way too convenient.

One thing I have read lately that is most certainly true: There were 2 separate hacks by 2 different entities. Would the Russions do that?

Would 2 teenage boys living in 2 different countries? Or 2 countries?

[Attention Surplus Disorder]

I agree with you.

There seems to be two semi-parallel but not necessarily convergent tales being told. One; that the Russians hacked the DNC server; and I completely agree, this is an excellent point for Stone’s defense: For the FBI to assert this against Stone; this is in effect hearsay, because the not only did the FBI never examine the DNC server(s), they were DENIED permission to do so. Of course, it’s in no way obstruction for the DNC to allow the FBI to examine their server. That would be like calling the cops to report a break-in at your house, and when they show up at your door to examine the premises and collect evidence, you don’t allow them in.

And two: That the Russians “interfered” or “meddled” with the 2016 election. Nobody denies the Russians may have bought a few hundred grand in misleading or trollish Twitter and Facebook posts and nobody believes that those posts changed even a single vote.

But the FBI is trying to create a nexus; of Russian meddling AND the release of HRC emails....but those emails were (perhaps some were) on the DNC server but they would have been primarily on HER private server. Yet Stone is being accused of some activity relating to the hack of the DNC server, more accurately his knowledge of when and by whom said hack was executed.

So I myself do not see (and have never seen) the connection and correlation of these two claims, but I am shallow and superficial in that way. It has always seemed to me there was a hack of the DNC server and a hack of HRC’s server but they are being treated as the same machine when clearly they were not.

[Liz]

Trump presses DOJ: Don't let Debbie Wasserman Schultz, former Dem IT aide 'off the hook'....
6/7/2018 | Katelyn Caralle & Daniel Chaitin / FR Posted by caww

A 2018 tweet from the president decried reports that Imran Awan, a Pakistani IT technician who worked for dozens of Democratic lawmakers over the years, is on the cusp of reaching a plea deal in a federal court case. “Our Justice Department must not let Awan & Debbie Wasserman Schultz off the hook. The Democrat I.T. scandal is a key to much of the corruption we see today. They want to make a “plea deal” to hide what is on their Server. Where is Server? Really bad!” Trump posted to Twitter Thursday morning.

Awan was arrested last year for bank fraud and double charging for House IT equipment. Following a number of delays, Fox News reported Wednesday that court filings indicate he's pushing for a plea deal with prosecutors.

Wasserman Schultz was chair of the DNC at the time of the hack and resigned in the summer of 2016 amid controversy over leaked emails that exposed the DNC's underhanded efforts to stifle Sen. Bernie Sanders' popularity during the primary.

The DNC denied requests by the FBI to inspect its hacked servers, then-FBI Director James Comey testified to lawmakers in early 2017. Instead, the organization opted for a private company to do the inspection. According to the legal complaint, the DNC said to remedy the hack they had to “decommission more than 140 servers, removed and reinstall software, including the operating systems, for more than 180 computers, and rebuild at least 11 servers.”

Now Trump is questioning what happened to the servers and why they were decommissioned before the Justice Department was able to review what was on them.

Wasserman Schultz had friends in high places at the time of the hack.

Riding on AF One with Obama.

Endorsing Hillary as president.

AS DNC head, rousing Democrats all over the country.She is a Broward, FLA resident.

D/W/S resigned as DNC head in the summer of 2016 amid controversy over leaked emails that exposed underhanded efforts to undercut Sen. Bernie Sanders.

cont

[Liz]

cont

The DNC denied requests by the FBI to inspect its hacked servers, then-FBI Director James Comey testified to lawmakers in early 2017. Instead, the organization opted for a private company to do the inspection. According to the legal complaint, the DNC said to remedy the hack they had to “decommission more than 140 servers, removed and reinstall software, including the operating systems, for more than 180 computers, and rebuild at least 11 servers.” Now President Trump is questioning what happened to the servers and why they were decommissioned before the Justice Department was able to review what was on them.

It is crucial to remember that suspect, Imran Awan, worked for D/W/S. Taxpayers demand to know the extent of DNC assistance to (A) members of the House intelligence panel, and, (B) members of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs who were among the dozens of elected Democrats the Awan Paki clan IT'ed for on a shared basis. Some reports say almost 80 Congressional Democrats employed the Paki IT's.

<><>Were Democrats' govt intel computers ever transported off-premises?

<><>Did the FBI and/or Secret Service accompany and supervise the transport of the Democrats' servers?

<><> Did the Awan clan have an active email account?

<><> Was there continuity of Democrat intel computer activity or did the intel computers ever go off-line?

<><> Who received Democrats' govt intel?

<><>Did the Awan clan get officially qualified by the DNC to handle national-security-level data?

<><> Did the Aan clan ever “upgrade, manage, and secure” the DNC server.

<><> What - specifically - did they do?

<><> Did the DNC vet the Awan clan for security clearance to handle this type of intel?

<><> What were the DNC firewall protocols in place at the time?

<><>Who, by name, had access to Democrats' intel computers, and the administrative authorization to do so?

<><>When was that authorization given?

<><>Did the the Awan clan ever remove all intel data from Democrats' computers?

<><> Was malware or antivirus also on the servers?

<><> Was the inherent firewall, virus protection, or operating system “upgraded, managed, and secured” by the brothers?

<><> Did the DNC report any incidents such as DOS attack, hacking, etc. How were they resolved?

<><> Did the Awan maintain the DNC intel computer? Here and in Pakistan?

<><> Does the DNC know if the House Permanent Intelligence Committee computers in functioning condition at this time?

<><> Does the DNC have the work schedule of the clan just prior to being outed for security breaches?

<><> Were normal and regular backup procedures executed on the servers?

<><> Where are the back-ups kept?

<><> If no backups were taken, does the DNC have a disaster recovery location? Where is that?

<><> Did the DNC have a backup plan if the House Permanent Intelligence Committee plan intel equipment failed or was found to have been compromised?

<><> Does the DNC list other foreign nationals (from countries President Obama identified as terrorist countries) employed on Capitol Hill?

<><> Did the DNC list foreign nationals by name and country who currently have access to US intel and are using govt computers.

[SaveFerris]

yep

[bitt]

thanks... I wouldn’t have bothered to post it if it had come up in search..

[bitt]

thanks... I wouldn’t have bothered to post it if it had come up in search..

[bitt]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdAZyCwclj4

Hard to disregard the testimony of Bill Binney!

[bitt]

You and I are going to make SOMEONE eat the Awan mess.....

and it will be delicious.

[hoosiermama]

Don’t forget DWS brother on the D.C. Police force.