Burr needs to be send packing
Word is that Burr threw the Dems a bone by doing this....that is EVIL!!<>.Mitchie...you better do something!
Republican house and Senate members should be lining up outside this guys door to give him a talking to. W hat a Judas
Wonder what the Feebs have on Burr....
Burr and Feinstein report to Collins/Romney and China,
not to America(ns).
A couple of years ago I took the opportunity to tell Burr how ashamed of him I was. Didn’t do any good but I sure enjoyed it.
Senator Burr has been an opposition leader to MAGA for quite a while. He and Romney are capable of stirring up quite a bit of trouble.
Burr? Helms he is surely not!
I’m just wondering how much dirt the RATs have on Burr.
Pull his chairmanship immediately!
When youve lost Tillis, you know youve really gone full retard...
Burr has always been Warner’s bitch. He should be stripped of his chairmanship.
Jonah Goldberg @JonahNRO
I have zero problem with Burr’s subpoena and I see the freakout about it as a sign of weakness/panic on GOP’s part (Don’t care much either tho). But I love the line from Rand Paul making it sound like GOP senators should just do whatever Mitch tells them.
Jack Posobiec @JackPosobiec
Burrs biggest donor was Paul Singer. Singer was the funder of Fusion GPS when he was pushing Romney in 2016. Now Romey is considering a 2020 run.
Draw your own conclusions
Limbaugh like his brother is incorrect. The Dems are saying that Barr got two lettesr from Mueller (25 and 27 March) after he sent his letter to Congress on March 24. The 27th letter said there were some summaries in the 25th letter that Barr should release to the public. "There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation" meaning "we want to smear Trump and you didn't go along with that" Then Barr answered possibly related questions in the appropriations hearings in April.
From the fake news:
No, I dont, Barr said, when asked by Rep. Charlie Crist (D-Fla.) whether he knew what was behind reports that members of Muellers team were frustrated by the attorney generals summary of their top-level conclusions.
I dont know, he said the next day, when asked by Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) whether Mueller supported his finding that there was not sufficient evidence to conclude that President Trump had obstructed justice.
With that, the dem/media says Barr is lying. To say the issue is only about Barr's public letter on March 24th is an oversimplification. The Dem/media claim is that Barr should have released the Mueller March 25th and 27th letters and summaries as the answer to the questions in the appropriations hearings, or acknowledged the existence of those. But Barr obviously can release whatever he wants from Mueller or not, his choice. Furthermore Barr specifically acknowledged there were other summaries and he didn't want to release those. Mainly, Barr has no need or requirement to speculate on the motives of Mueller's team who obviously sent the letters and leaked the March 27th letter to the media. Their motivation is probably that they hate Trump. But arr has no requirement to read their minds.
Can’t the gobbler remove him from his chair assignment?