Posted on 05/03/2019 6:48:06 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
It's interesting, some on this thread say they're tired of phrases such as, "anti-Trump, never-Trump" etc because they say this is some kind of hero worship for Trump. As if it's not the absolute truth where all the the usual suspects, the deceitful Democrats, media, deep state etc., are not 100% against Trump 24 hours a day, year in, year out. Every word and action Trump says or makes, they're right there bad mouthing and attempting to discredit and defile Trump 24/7. Be very aware of these people.
“It’s interesting, some on this thread say they’re tired of phrases such as, “anti-Trump, never-Trump” etc because they say this is some kind of hero worship for Trump.”
The exact same words used by the intolerant bullies here in 2016, one of whom stalked me while extolling the virtues of Ted Cruz.
Even REFER to #neverTrump Hussein Head Cruzbots for BJ’s wife, and they feel COMPELLED to reply and attack, even if they weren’t addressed directly.
We’re heavily infiltrated here.
There is that theory out there. Have you ever read about it at all?
No question. Not unlike television, the anti-Trump networks, deep state, poser politicians, the deceitful Democrats etc. There is no shortage.
Heavily infiltrated? Lol that tin foil on a little too tight? So let me get this right, person A says hey I disagree with the President because of x,y,z. Person B says youre a Cruzbot, youre a Never Trumper because of a disagreement in policy. Person A defends himself from being called the school yard names and person B plays the passive aggressive pansy for being called out on it by person A. Person B continues extolling virtue by whining to others about their predicament.
Intolerant bullies, Cruzbot, Never Trumper, Never Trump are all boring, overused, yawn inducing, infantile terms used to shut down debate about disagreements in policy. These tactics are no different than liberal juveniles yelling racccissst at every turn. The only folks I see still completely butt sore point to a person in a primary that was defeated over 3 years ago. Have primaries in the past been testy? Yup. However this one tops them all. Still to this day I think I still hear incantations of the power of Cruz compels you Are there folks that hate Trump? Sure there are. But I see none in this thread. My suggestion for a valid defense of points would be to no pull out the Cruz card. It makes your argument weak.
So implying or calling someone an ignorant fool is akin to not supporting the President? Sounds more to me like taking a position on what he feels is foolish ignorance displayed by the President and youre making it exactly what people are saying about the person.
Did he use the term stupid to directly attack the President? Did he State we have a stupid President for such actions or the actions he is taking are stupid? Big difference. To place equivalence on what he has said vs. CNN and MSM hatred is a stretch. What makes us different from liberal posting sites is that we can disagree because we dont have mindless zombies but thinkers. The more people set aside personal feelings for the person and place just as much emotion behind disagreements in policy the better off debate is. Nothing in his statements I see disparage or discredit our President. When did conservatives adopt such a messiah complex that made being critical of a persons policy an unforgivable sin?
You were told to go back and look at the history before making ignorant comments. You clearly didn't.
And I noted ya walked right by this part below.
"The reality the poster repeatedly was calling and implying Trump was an ignorant fool for even talking to Kim because they knew better because they are the self described "Asian expert". Look at the history. It's there.
And btw, were you too against Trump even sitting down and talking to the North Koreans?
Don’t give me the “Messiah complex” bull s**t. Trumps the greatest president in your life time. If not for Trump you’d have H.Clinton and Obama bumping bellies with deep state in the Oval Office. There would be no coming back from 8 years of that nightmare scenario after following 8 years of Obama. I starting to think think you deserve this president. Maybe you’re a poser too.
Btw, some people here are starting to sound just like CNN with their Trump trashing. I find that very odd.
Here are your comments to me below..
"The more people set aside personal feelings for the person and place just as much emotion behind disagreements in policy the better off debate is..... When did conservatives adopt such a messiah complex that made being critical of a persons policy an unforgivable sin?"
Now here are the Communist/lefist comments from the LA Time below.
Trump has harnessed the kind of emotional intensity from his base that is more typical of a religious revival meeting than a political rally, complete with ritualized communal chants (Lock her up!). As we approach the one-year anniversary of Trumps election victory, the zeal of some of his followers seems increasingly akin to a full-fledged cult.
Interesting, eh Mr. Jarhead?
If what North Korea referred to as the launch of “tactical guided weapons” was indeed the test of the North’s version of the Iskander, it could be in violation of the U.N. Security Council resolution that bans the communist nation from all kinds of ballistic missile launches.
North Korea has set a clock ticking for the end of the year. As Kim warned in his New Year’s Day message even before the Hanoi summit, the United States only had so much time before North Korea’s patience would run out. Saturday’s launches are yet another reminder to Trump about what stands to be lost: this time it was a small missile, but it might not be so small in a matter of weeks or months. There is no surprise that too much was assumed of the Norks and that in principle, coddling or flattering dictators (it cannot be denied this was ta tactically tried) indeed has its limits and is failing. This is the reality here in Asia.
I read the posts. Im sorry I just dont look through rose collected glasses and see things written that arent there. He clearly is taking exception with his policies with respect to N. Korea. For someone taking that stance Id right call it foolish ignorance too and naive to think you can reason and make nice with a mad man. While I may not agree that meeting him is foolish and ignorant to try to place a foot forward I still do not think such belief to the contrary is anti anything.
So no I wasnt against him trying to talk to N. Korea however in retrospect I was an ignorant fool to believe that meeting fishy the madman of the North would result any anything different than what is playing out. There is no hatred in that comment
Im sorry but the left too had a messiah complex with respect to Obama. Some swore they saw him walk on water, spoke in tongues, fainted at his touch even if his policies were driving us straight off a cliff. Is Trump anywhere close to Obama? Not even close and I think hes an excellent President. However there is definitely a cult of personality that surrounds him and the mere utterance of disagreement with policy is quickly defended by those that dont offer retort based on policy but on the person. Call it what you wish but Ill call a spade a spade.
Im sorry I just dont look through rose collected glasses and see things written that arent there.
That is sorry. Look up the definition of the word history. Example not this current thread, but the history of the poster going back a couple of years. This is not complex, nor very time consuming. Got computer? Do the research. Report back when ya get up to speed.
Thank you so much for exemplifying my post. Have a great day!
Please do try to troll someone else. Your attempts thus far have failed. Draw back on emotion and more towards logic. I could literally repeat a thousand times (as Ive done) I find Trump to be a wonderful president but god heavens forbid if I should disparage or disagree with a policy; thatd be blasphemy of the highest order! So if I like both Trump and Cruz (since we are into names and all) does that therefore make me a Truzbot? A never Nancy? The names are over used, constantly regurgitated, Antifa-lite and quite honestly lazy as hell. Are the names meant to label people? Place them in a bucket....over there? Are they a joke? If so, hello Michael its 1980 and Kit is requesting his joke back.
Get a grip.
Why bully me, when others on the thread agreed with me?
Pontificate elsewhere, POS. GFY.
Typical passive aggressive. Be passive or be aggressive, not both. Dont snipe then pull back as the victim. We loved our passive aggressives in the Corps. They were the quickest weeded out with a good old fashioned blanket party. So no sir you can GFY....
Typical keyboard warrior
If you always agreed with me, you should seek help :)
State department troll. You’re just another Trump saboteur neocon type. But keep running in the door breathlessly every few weeks screaming that Korea has fallen apart.
It’s entertaining watching a self proclaimed “expert” fulminate as the world passes them by.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.