Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mattis ignored orders from Trump, White House on North Korea, Iran: report
The Hill ^ | 4/29/2019 | eileen mitchell

Posted on 04/29/2019 10:41:26 PM PDT by bitt

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Smedley Butler was also a kook.


41 posted on 04/30/2019 4:39:33 AM PDT by Tallguy (Facts be d*mned! The narrative of the day must be preserved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

This article is a load of BS on a number of levels. Consider the source.

Good point...don't believe everything a Dem operative tells you about the Trump/Mattis relationship.

42 posted on 04/30/2019 4:40:04 AM PDT by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

“Hard to believe Trump had no trouble with treason.”

Is everything treason now?

I dunno.


43 posted on 04/30/2019 4:52:03 AM PDT by READINABLUESTATE (Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution - Judge Jeanie Pirro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

“..I’m sure Trump and his people toss around all sorts of ideas, scenarios, etc... every leader does that. ..”

absolutely right - put the conference or meeting into a “think tank” mode where every thought, no matter how dumb is introduced without consequence. Anything goes and the right solution usually results at the end of the time. Good point.


44 posted on 04/30/2019 4:53:01 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said theoal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bitt
Interesting that no insiders have ever said that Obama’s instincts were dangerous and leaked it to the press when we all know Obama’s instincts were very dangerous to our Republic.
45 posted on 04/30/2019 5:21:25 AM PDT by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

>>> according to a former senior administration official <<<

Fake News from a never-Trump putz.


46 posted on 04/30/2019 5:35:03 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vlad The Inhaler

Well, were the “orders” provided in writing?

I’m not taking sides but asking a pertinent question


47 posted on 04/30/2019 5:39:31 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Honduras must be invaded to protect America from invasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

I never did. Glad he is gone.


48 posted on 04/30/2019 5:44:07 AM PDT by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Mattis ignored the Haditha Marines too...


49 posted on 04/30/2019 5:45:35 AM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Well I guess he was canned for a reason.


50 posted on 04/30/2019 6:03:30 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert
Well, were the “orders” provided in writing?

If your subordinate looks for loopholes to avoid a request to do something simple like set up a discussion to explore options in the event a crisis develops you have the wrong person in that position.

A top executive needs subordinates on the same page - to assist him, not to undermine him.

Subordinates looking for loopholes and weasel-ways to evade or counter their boss should be axed.

A former top-level subordinate who goes public with tales of how he ignored or screwed over the president is an ass.

51 posted on 04/30/2019 6:40:46 AM PDT by Vlad The Inhaler (In the 20th Century Britain fell from world superpower to just another backwater muslim colony)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: bitt
declined to carry out orders = 892. ARTICLE 92. FAILURE TO OBEY ORDER OR REGULATION.>
52 posted on 04/30/2019 6:51:07 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

He was a civilian


53 posted on 04/30/2019 7:05:58 AM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bitt

“Trump ordered the Pentagon to begin removing the spouses and children of military personnel from South Korea, where the U.S. military has a base.”

Has “a” base???? The U.S. has a number of bases in South Korea!!! Not “a” base. Are they really that stupid at the Hill??


54 posted on 04/30/2019 7:52:26 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qaz123

“He has the right to disobey, what he considers to be an ‘unlawful order’”

NO!

He has the right to disobey an ‘unlawful order’.

This, on it’s face, IS a lawful order. The subordinate does not get to decide which orders he is going to follow.


55 posted on 04/30/2019 7:54:38 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Gen McArthur thought he could ignore the President also.


56 posted on 04/30/2019 7:56:03 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
"The president thinks out loud. Do you treat it like an order? Or do you treat it as part of a longer conversation? We treated it as part of a longer conversation," a former senior national security official told The New Yorker.

That is actually a reasonable position. If at any time Trump says,"Say aye,aye, Mr. President and execute it," it is unmistakably an order and any effective executive knows how to do that.

57 posted on 04/30/2019 7:59:06 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: faucetman

Lawful Orders

Military members failing to obey lawful orders issued by their superiors risk serious consequences. Article 90 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) outlines the crime of willful disobedience by a military member a superior commissioned officer. Article 91 covers willful disobedience of a superior Noncommissioned or Warrant Officer. Article 92 conveys what constitutes the crime of disobedience of any lawful order (the disobedience does not have to be “willful” under this article).

These articles require the obedience of LAWFUL orders. Not only should an unlawful order not be obeyed, obeying such an order can result in criminal prosecution. Military courts have long held that military members are accountable for their actions even while following orders.


So, what is an “unlawful order”? If you give me an order and I think it’s, unlawful, I can disobey it. Doesn’t mean I’m right, by any stretch of the imagination. I do so at my own risk, peril and freedom. Because at some point, I’m going to have to explain my actions, to my superiors or a military court. And I better be right. Otherwise, I’m f*cked.


58 posted on 04/30/2019 8:22:59 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: xzins

he worked for trump so if her thought the order was illegal or he couldn’t follow it, he should have resigned. As it is trump died him, so the proper thing was done.

If you ever managed people you would understand.


59 posted on 04/30/2019 11:41:38 AM PDT by morphing libertarian ( Use Comey's Report; Indict Hillary now; build Kate's wall. --- Proud Smelly Walmart Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: READINABLUESTATE

That’s why I don’t think this article is accurate.

He wouldn’t put up with it.

This wasn’t in thee public eye like the mueller nonsense.

IF his order were directly disobeyed, that’s bad.

Is it treason? I dunno either :)


60 posted on 04/30/2019 11:50:58 AM PDT by dp0622 (The Left should know if.. Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson