They were in a fight to the death over laundery.
Nope. And all disparity of force arguments one can use justify this as well.
“On the floor, Custer drew the Springfield and fired six shots, striking Gunderson in the chest, abdomen, groin and arm. “
“Read more: https://www.ammoland.com/2019/04/idaho-case-illustrates-attacker-doesnt-need-weapon-to-justify-armed-defense/#ixzz5mQTmDL2O
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook
Custer was found not guilty by reason of self defense. At the trial, Chris Gunderson gave testimony about his use of multiple intoxicants before the incident.”
Sounds like Custer had FMJs instead of hollowpoints since Gynderson was still alive. Regardless, Custer stopped the threat with what he had in his pistol.
Idiots in government who let that go to a jury trial. Bureaucrats are almost always blinded by their own self righteousness and perfection. In almost all cases, they are wrong.
I know it’s a little beside the point of your article but I’m left wondering if Gunderson was ever charged with anything.
A list of 235 homicides committed with a single bare-handed blow:
http://onepunchhomicide.com/200%20list%20of%20OPH.htm