Posted on 04/25/2019 4:28:31 PM PDT by spintreebob
Years of budget cuts to public health led to the elimination of more than 55,000 positions within local health departments from 2008 through 2017, according to a report released Wednesday.
The Trust for America's Health estimates public health efforts are about $4.5 billion underfunded. That's led state and local health departments woefully unprepared to address public health emergencies such as infectious disease outbreaks, extreme weather events, and the opioid crisis.
"One could argue that there has always been underfunding but it is more meaningful at a period of time when cuts haven't been restored and risks have increased," said John Auerbach, president and CEO of Trust for America's Health.
Public health funding represented 2.5% of the roughly 3.5 trillion spent on healthcare in 2017, which totaled and average of $274 per person. In fiscal year 2018, state spending on public health increased by 2% to a total of $11.8 billion. Seventeen states and the District of Columbia cut their budgets that year, with some, including Alaska, Maine and Texas, decreasing their funding by more than 10% over the prior year.
Among local health departments, the report found one-fifth reported decreases in their fiscal 2017 budgets.
About a quarter of health departments serving populations of less than 50,000 reported budget cuts in both 2016 and 2017.
Both state and local health departments receive the majority of their funding from grants provided by the Prevention and Public Health Fund established under the Affordable Care Act. In fiscal 2018, the fund allocated more than $586 million of its $800 million budget to states and municipalities.
The PPHF has been consistently used to fund efforts not related to public health.
In 2012, President Barack Obama signed a bill that cut the fund by more than $6 billion over nine years to pay for cuts to Medicare physician payments. A year later, the fund lost $450 million to set up the federal health insurance marketplace.
The massive tax cut passed in 2017 cut another $750 million from the fund to cover the costs of the Children's Health Insurance Program, while the budget bill passed in 2018 cut $1.35 billion from the PPHF over 10 years.
"(The fund) has been used to backfill cuts in well-established programs or it's been decreased to fund other kinds of activities," Auerbach said. "An important way of improving the financial status of the public health system would be to restore the fund to its original allocation ($15 billion over 10 years) and not have it redirected to other sources."
Auerbach wished public health efforts could receive more established funding to handle emerging threats without having to wait for Congress to approve resources. For example, experts had to request emergency funding to address the Ebola outbreak in 2014, the Zika virus in 2016, and more recently, the opioid epidemic.
"That kind of funding impedes the ability of public health to actually prevent risk or to respond in a timely manner," Auerbach said. "If the funding comes in the midst of an emergency you're quickly doing catch-up."
In addition to restoring the PPHF's funding, the report recommended increasing CDC funding by 22% by fiscal 2022 over what was funded in 2018.
The Trust for America's Health report recommended payers and providers help public health efforts by conducting patient screenings for issues such as food insecurity, housing instability and other social determinants of health.
Establishing partnerships with providers and payers was just part of what Michael Fraser, executive director for the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, saw as public health's evolving role as both a provider of crucial health surveillance data and a connector.
"Public health has demonstrated a lot of leadership to convene both clinical partners as well as different sectors to have these conversations about social determinants and to really push this health-in-all-policies approach," Fraser said.
Send us a letter
Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.
Obama cuts are quoted for 1 year despite the fact that they are in perpetuity. ACA during Trump years is made to appear like Trump is doing it. Cuts during Trump years are for 9 and 10 year aggregates so they look large compared to Obama's 1 year numbers.
But most important: The Public Health money was always raided by other programs and not used for Public Health. So the cuts the author cries about were not to Public Health at all. They were cuts to the raiding parties.
It is fortunate that Public Health has nothing to do with facts, logic, science or reality.
Yeah, the risk of finding poop on the streets of Urban Utopias is quickly increasing.
Translation: mo’ money, mo’ money, mo’ money!!!
Threats like human Petri dishes flooding unimpeded across the border?
Those kind of threats?
Seems fitting that their nests are the perfect places for epidemics to break out and rather than having paid any attention to Public Health, there will be plenty of government funded grief counselors to visit those who are dying of third world chithole diseases.
Seems to me that it's part and parcel of, "God is not mocked".
JMHo
It’s a choice. Free stuff for the informers and uncitizens, or health department stuff.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.