Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Alaska lawmakers pass resolution to connect railroad to Canada
KTVA ^ | 16 Apr 2019 | Angela Krenzien

Posted on 04/18/2019 7:07:42 PM PDT by KC_Lion

A train on the Alaska Railroad (KTVA/File)

The Alaska Senate wants a federal border permit that would allow a railroad crossing to be built between the state and Canada.

Senators voted 19-0 on Senate Joint Resolution 11, according to a release from the Alaska Senate majority Monday.

Sen. Shelley Hughes, R-Palmer, is chair of the Senate Transportation Committee and says a railroad through Canada would benefit people all over the state.

“A railroad connecting Alaska to Alberta would provide a huge boost to our state’s economy,” she said in the release. “Access to the North American railroad system would mean faster and more efficient shipping of goods, lowering the cost of living for all Alaskans.”

The Senate majority's release noted there would be no state funds used to build the railroad.

Congress approved construction of up to 1,000 miles of railroad to connect coastal and interior areas of Alaska, meant to support development, rail service and military operations.

(Excerpt) Read more at ktva.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Politics/Elections; US: Alaska
KEYWORDS: alaska; alaskarailroad; alaskarailway; alberta; canada; railroad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: BudgieRamone

ditto


21 posted on 04/18/2019 9:00:43 PM PDT by razorback-bert (Due to the high price of ammo, no warning shot will be fired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Paul R.

When we went on the train my Brother and myself were allowed to ride in a open boxcar for a better view.

They would never allow that today with all the lawsuits.


22 posted on 04/18/2019 9:28:27 PM PDT by Beagle8U (It's not whether you win or lose, it's how you place the blame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: BudgieRamone

I did this trip, too, from Skagway, over White Pass which is the USA/Canada border, cut across about 28 miles of British Columbia to the Yukon border at the 60th parallel, ending at Carcross, Yukon (a bus takes you the last 45 minutes into Whitehorse, the capital of Yukon. The train trip is a total of 67 miles. I was one of the only “walk on” passengers on my train, 99% of them having been on the cruise ships which dock at Skagway. I took the Alaska Marine Highway ferry for about 6.5 hours from Juneau to Skagway (I had flown to Alaska on Delta through JNU airport).

Unfortunately, this is a narrow gauge train which is unfit for big freight trains.

Alberta just voted in a new conservative government on Tuesday of this week; congratulations to them!!!


23 posted on 04/18/2019 9:36:16 PM PDT by nd76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

It would definitely help out the high cost of shipping from the lower 48, especially big items like tires and hazardous materials. The Port in Anchorage is about to be condemned so the pressure is higher for air freight.
But what i see that might be promising is an Alaska Express tour train, a North America fersion of the Orient Express, might be a 4 or 5 day trip but if it has luxurious sleeping, dining and entertainment it would sell out.
Or best yet put a steam engine up front with a diesel or two as backup. Steam enthusiasts would go nuts.


24 posted on 04/18/2019 9:43:03 PM PDT by Daniel Ramsey (Thank YOU President Trump, finally we can do what America does best, to be the best)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daniel Ramsey

Sign me up!


25 posted on 04/18/2019 9:56:08 PM PDT by mindburglar (Stupid is supposed to hurt. - Lurkers Granddad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Sweet! Make it happen!


26 posted on 04/18/2019 10:41:56 PM PDT by vpintheak (Stop making stupid people famous!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Won’t some mosquitoes be harmed in the building of the railroad?
You know there already is a shortage of mosquitoes in Alaska.


27 posted on 04/18/2019 10:56:00 PM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

We need some Gord on this thread

Canadian Railroad Trilogy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NjoU1Qkeizs


28 posted on 04/18/2019 10:57:52 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deplorable American1776

That won’t happen. The Bering Strait is too dangerous and the large cargo ships can carry more than a train can drag. The difference in time of shipping stuff would only be a couple of days difference.


29 posted on 04/18/2019 11:08:48 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death by cultsther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

Would be nice, but that’s some mighty rough terrain to build through. Construction costs would be pricey.


30 posted on 04/19/2019 12:49:48 AM PDT by NoCmpromiz (John 14:6 is a non-pluralistic comment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

SSNs have often arrived at their Bangor Washington base underwater and under the Hood Canal Bridge.


31 posted on 04/19/2019 12:56:06 AM PDT by PIF (They camTo think the choice came down to Gorka/Bannon oe for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chemical_boy

The problem with connecting to BC is the number of mountains in the way. The proposed route is in much flatter land north and east of the Alaska Range and the Rockies. Oil will be the main initial customer, but manifests will bring down the costs of consumer goods all along the route.


32 posted on 04/19/2019 2:42:55 AM PDT by Fraxinus (My opinion, worth what you paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Deplorable American1776; TigersEye

The train bridge will never happen. Pure fantasy.

First, the logistical challenges. It would require two — not one, but two — 25 mile long bridges from each end to each of the Diomede Islands. These bridges would span deep and swift moving ocean currents. This has never been done before. Sinking pylons into the deep ocean would push civil and ocean engineering to its limits. Then, the bridges would have to survive wind and shear loads like never done before, because the weather is particularly inhospitable.

Then there’s the economic justification. Who would use it? A few Eskimos and Chukchis who were related back when there was a land bridge? It would still be more economical to ship goods by container ship.

Think California’s $100 billion train to nowhere is costly and a joke? So would the RR bridge from Alaska to Siberia, and it would probably cost more.


33 posted on 04/19/2019 7:34:56 AM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PIF

That’s pretty much unavoidable isn’t it? Coming and going to and from bases is sort of a given.


34 posted on 04/19/2019 3:45:25 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: tom h
The train bridge will never happen. Pure fantasy.

As I assumed.

35 posted on 04/19/2019 3:46:37 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

in this case, no, most subs, when I lived there, came in on the surface.


36 posted on 04/20/2019 3:18:44 AM PDT by PIF (They camTo think the choice came down to Gorka/Bannon oe for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Meaning their location was no secret. Unlike when they are on deployment.


37 posted on 04/20/2019 4:29:22 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

The Russian “trawlers” were just 20 miles or so offshore when the surfaced just off the entrance to the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Secret from us but not so much from the Russians - subs from both fleets tracked each other all the time.


38 posted on 04/20/2019 4:36:23 PM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: PIF

Of course. But in the open seas they lose each other. Or are you saying that the whole idea of subs operating covertly, and the tens of millions spent on giving them that capability, is nothing more than PR for us proles?


39 posted on 04/20/2019 4:49:40 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Of course. But in the open seas they lose each other. Or are you saying that the whole idea of subs operating covertly, and the tens of millions spent on giving them that capability, is nothing more than PR for us proles?


Pretty much. If you chose to believe one thing or another does not mean its true. The media lies, the government lies. Always take this stuff about “amazing capabilities” with a grain of salt or the whole shaker. Each side only knows if their stuff actually works is when the shooting starts.

Meanwhile, they play “cat and mouse” all the time with one side tracking the other then the roles switch when one loses the other - its a game - deadly but still a game of who has the best sonar and the best acoustic specialists at any given moment. Sometime a sub will be ‘lost’ to the other side - usually the US sub, but not always. Sometimes the sub will be so quiet they will surface in the middle of a war game just to show they can go undetected - both the Russians and the Chinese did so - Were they actually undetected? Who knows.

Think of the under sea oceans as battlegrounds with each side constantly maneuvering to take a shot at the other but not actually shooting. Each side uses its best tech and best subs to gain the advantage on the other. Nothing new here.


40 posted on 04/21/2019 1:39:05 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson