Posted on 04/12/2019 7:19:24 AM PDT by Helicondelta
The White House considered going after political opponents by pushing U.S. immigration authorities to release detained immigrants into "sanctuary cities," three sources familiar with the idea confirmed Friday.
They told The Associated Press that President Donald Trump considered the proposal amid his ongoing battling Democrats over border wall funding.
The Washington Post said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's district in San Francisco was among the targets.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...
Good idea. They want them so badly, then let them live with it.
The title makes out like they would think that is a bad thing to do. They have been dumping them in red states trying to flip the states blue, if not at least purple. To hell with Democrats. Let them feed and house the third world.
You want them, YOU GET THEM!
It would be the height of cruelty to send them where they aren’t wanted!
Excellent idea.
They should revisit the idea, and forge ahead!!!!
If libs want ‘em so badly, have at it!!!!
Send them to Malibu and Beverly Hills!
Fake News, but a great concept.
Provide the new comers with maps of where the nice DemocRats
live and will welcome them with open arms.
They make a bee-line there, anyway.
Pick one.
San Francisco.
Send them a thousand a day, for a hundred days.
Call them racists if they complain.
Great idea !
“Good idea. They want them so badly, then let them live with it.”
Agreed. In the cities of Minneapolis and St Paul, there are a number of areas that are heavily white, heavily upper middle class to wealthy and filled with white liberal angst. In short, where these people reside is NIMBY territory.
I would love for these illegal aliens to be dumped right in these neighborhoods.
Do it!
Socialists like to spend other people’s money.
Socialists like illegal aliens — they just want them to live in other people’s neighborhoods.
This would be answer number 2. It is a great idea second only to idea number 1. DEPORT THEM ALL!
Heh, it reminded me of the woodchuck problem I have had over the years, I finally decided to take the situation in hand and brought some traps. I am not allowed in my state to relocate them, but I view that as a “suggestion”...:)
I had six of them I captured, and I have heard you have to take them a minimum of five miles away, so I began driving them up the road, and five miles away...there was a community gardening thingie run by local Lefties, so...I decided to release them into a nice, wooded area with a plentiful food source nearby!
The problem here is talk, and not action. They shouldve just done it. Theres no excuse for not dumping these illegals into San Francisco, and other sanctuaries. Why should they be simply dumping them into El Paso and Phoenix in Dallas etc. Of course, the better response would be to simply dump them or their carcasses back across the border.
One more thing to get them on record. Nice.
If libs are anything, they are hypocrites of the first order.
Bad idea, in general. That's what Obama did with his "welcoming communities" EO.
But, in a specific test case, it would be brilliant. If you found the absolute worst sanctuary city, in the sense of ICE non-cooperation, benefits to illegals, etc., and said that as a "test case for integration into America" you were preferentially sending illegals there to wait for their court date, it would set up a very amusing situation. "Fill 'er up!"
Wait a minute.
Should not these sanctuary cities consider it a signal blessing to have these illegals transported to their districts so they can luxuriate in their presence? Should not Nancy Pelosi and all her democrats insist on positioning them next door so they can prove their good faith?
Isn’t it racism for the Trump administration to NOT send them their voters?
Paradise. It’s warm. Plenty of fruit trees. Very(too)lenient.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.