Posted on 04/05/2019 8:52:38 AM PDT by aimhigh
As a non-Catholic I would whisper to you that JESUS never established a papacy or an org to dictate worship dogma. In fact, in The Revelation He even mentions He hates orgs (Nicolaitans anyone?) doing that way back in the first decades from the razing of Jerusalem. But of course, as a good Catholic you must ignore my whisper, so I won't bother.
What happens if Francis takes one of his goofball ideas and declares it a papal bull?
There are currently 24 "churches", inside the "Catholic Church", which can each be addressed individually (such as "The Maronite Church", or "The Coptic Church", or "The Latin Church", or "The Greek Byzantine Catholic Church", etc.). Why does that give you so much trouble, Elsie? The One Church founded by Jesus Christ can be addressed at many subdivided levels (and often is). (Just do a simple Google search on any one of these "Churches" or "Traditions", and see for yourself.)
CATHOLIC CHURCHES
Latin liturgical tradition:
Latin Church
Alexandrian liturgical tradition:
Coptic Catholic Church
Ethiopian Catholic Church
Eritrean Catholic Church
Antiochian liturgical tradition:
Maronite Church
Syriac Catholic Church
Syro-Malankara Catholic Church
Armenian liturgical tradition:
Armenian Catholic Church
East Syriac or Chaldean liturgical tradition:
Chaldean Catholic Church
Syro-Malabar Catholic Church
Byzantine liturgical tradition:
Albanian Greek Catholic Church
Belarusian Greek Catholic Church
Bulgarian Greek Catholic Church
Greek Catholic Church of Croatia and Serbia
Greek Byzantine Catholic Church
Hungarian Greek Catholic Church
Italo-Albanian Catholic Church
Macedonian Greek Catholic Church
Melkite Greek Catholic Church
Romanian Greek Catholic Church
Russian Greek Catholic Church
Ruthenian Greek Catholic Church (also known in the United States as the Byzantine Catholic Church)
Slovak Greek Catholic Church
Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church
There are (approximately) 223,128 Catholic parishes in cities all over the world, each of which can also be accurately addressed individually as a separate church.
Don't you get that simple point?
"If the very order of episcopal succession is to be considered, how much more surely, truly, and safely do we number them [the bishops of Rome] from Peter himself, to whom, as to one representing the whole Church, the Lord said, Upon this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of hell shall not conquer it. Peter was succeeded by Linus, Linus by Clement. In this order of succession a Donatist bishop is not to be found" (Letters 53:1:2 [A.D. 412]).
"Among these [apostles] Peter alone almost everywhere deserved to represent the whole Church. Because of that representation of the Church, which only he bore, he deserved to hear 'I will give to you the keys of the kingdom of heaven'" (Sermons 295:2 [A.D. 411]).
"Some things are said which seem to relate especially to the apostle Peter, and yet are not clear in their meaning unless referred to the Church, which he is acknowledged to have represented in a figure on account of the primacy which he bore among the disciples. Such is I will give unto you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and other similar passages. In the same way, Judas represents those Jews who were Christs enemies" (Commentary on Psalm 108 1 [A.D. 415]).
"Who is ignorant that the first of the apostles is the most blessed Peter?" (Commentary on John 56:1 [A.D. 416]).
There are many other quotes from the Early Church Fathers you never post, that also contradict your viewpoint, such as those found here:
and here:
Augustine, of course, was a bad boy for many years, and did not get converted to Christianity until he was into his 30's, (after many prayers and tears of his Mother). His views changed and developed over time, and many of his views and interpretations were eventually adopted by the Church.
Augustine became an anointed priest (under the pope of that time), then later became anointed the Bishop of Hippo, (also under the pope), so he obviously believed in apostolic succession. He lived only several hundred years after the apostles, so he clearly understood the ramifications of his joining the Catholic Church, and becoming a Catholic priest, then becoming a Catholic bishop.
The Orthodox Christians also consider Peter the first "Patriarch of Antioch", and for the Orthodox, the Patriarch of Antioch (where the Christians were first called Christians - Acts 11:26) is one of the original patriarchs of Early Christianity, who presided over the bishops of Syria, Palestine and Georgia.
These links shed light on the primacy of Peter, that Augustine clearly spoke about:
"Which disciple is mentioned the most in the Bible?"
Point #1: You are not putting limitations on a person, you are putting limitations on God. Can God enable a person to handle that, if He so wills it, or is that impossible for God to do?
Point #2: Do you somehow think that God and Heaven run on the same time system and division as the time system on earth, with it's 24-hour sunrise, sunset, time pattern?
Point #3: Can God enable His creation to have things happen to them "in the twinkling of an eye", or is that too tough for God?
From the JW article: " Was Jesus saying that his church, or congregation, would be built upon Peter, a man? Was Peter to be the head of all other followers of Jesus? How did the other apostles present at that conversation understand Jesus words? The Gospels reveal that later, on a number of occasions, they argued about who was the greatest among them. (Matthew 20:20-27; Mark 9:33-35; Luke 22:24-26) If Jesus had already given Peter primacy, or superiority, could there have been any question as to who was the greatest among the apostles?
Several of the silly, paranoid, snowflaky rules this fairy compiled, would apply in a negative way to our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ, if applied in a non-digital way. (Remember these?)
And while He was being accused by the chief priests and elders, He did not answer. Then Pilate said to Him, "Do You not hear how many things they testify against You?" And He did not answer him with regard to even a single charge, so the governor was quite amazed. Matthew 27:12-14
"And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet."
Matthew 10:14
Jesus obviously did not believe in responding to everything put to him, nor did He advocate endlessly going back and forth, back and forth, with ornery, obstinate people, over, and over, and over again, but, rather, He demonstrated that silence was sometimes the best response, and that shaking the dust off your feet at those who just won't listen to you, is often the right thing to do.
Another point to remember is this: you told all of us that you are about the same age as Bernie Sanders. Now, you may have the time on your hands to sit around at your computer all day and night, posting endless streams of repetitive gems of wisdom, from early in the morning, till late at night, but some of us are not as "seasoned" as you, Elsie, and we cannot just totally abandon or neglect our family, friends, duties, responsibilities, etc., and respond to every single marvelous thing you post here, like that gay guy Sweeney the Weenie advocates. And, frankly, my brother Elsie, your own impressive profusion of long, repetitive, inaccurate, "friendly" posts, get to be a bit tedious to read and respond to after a while, so other folks here, who aren't tied to their computers, have to sometimes just get up and walk away from all those words, for a while.
A much better way to assess this, than that fruity homosexual Sweeney's "25 Rules", would be to simply make this assessment: Is what is being said, true, or is it false? That's it. (Unless you are joking, or being facetious, simply use this chart as a guideline, and you can't go wrong, my brother, Elsie.)
|
|
|
|
When you tell the truth, you are working for this side. |
When you tell a lie, you are working for this side. |
When you deny that a false statement is true, you are working for this side. |
When you claim a false statement is true, you are working for this side. |
When you disagree with someone making a false statement, you are working for this side. |
When you agree with someone making a false statement, you are working for this side. |
When you agree with someone telling the truth, you are working for this side. |
When you disagree with someone telling the truth, you are working for this side. |
When you follow the teachings and examples of Jesus concerning totally silent responses, or simply leaving a discussion completely, (shaking the dust off your feet at the ones you were talking to) you are working for this side. |
When you try to follow those "25 Rules" from that fruity homosexual, "Sweeney the Weenie", (whose rules would attack even Jesus Christ), you are working for this side. |
Now I'm going to "Hit-and-run", and shake off the dust of my feet (as I have to go somewhere tonight), so I wish you a pleasant evening Brother Elsie! See you in the next thread that comes along, and, may God bless you!
Regarding the apostles, of course they didn't understand what He meant at the time, about almost every single thing He said! Their understanding about all these things came very MUCH later. (Have to say goodnight, as I have to run now.)
I don’t have a Pope.
For my argument, it does not matter. In fact, it enhances my position.
If you fail to put the words of the phrase in quotes; you WILL get a lot of hits; of each individual word!
5. Ridicule is mans most potent weapon. There is no defense. Its irrational. Its infuriating. It also works as a key pressure point to force the enemy into concessions.
7. A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Dont become old news.
8. Keep the pressure on. Never let up. Keep trying new things to keep the opposition off balance. As the opposition masters one approach, hit them from the flank with something new.
12. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it. Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.
I do; I DO!!
Seven Catholic churches in Asia were so screwed up that an angel had to tell John to write to them with dire warnings.
I hope this isn't too simple for you; though.
#23. Create bigger distractions. If the above does not seem to be working to distract from sensitive issues, or to prevent unwanted media coverage of unstoppable events such as trials, create bigger news stories (or treat them as such) to distract the multitudes.
"If the very order of episcopal succession is to be considered, how much more surely, truly, and safely do we number them [the bishops of Rome] from Peter himself, to whom, as to one representing the whole Church, the Lord said, Upon this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of hell shall not conquer it. Peter was succeeded by Linus, Linus by Clement. In this order of succession a Donatist bishop is not to be found" (Letters 53:1:2 [A.D. 412]).
"Among these [apostles] Peter alone almost everywhere deserved to represent the whole Church. Because of that representation of the Church, which only he bore, he deserved to hear 'I will give to you the keys of the kingdom of heaven'" (Sermons 295:2 [A.D. 411]).
"Some things are said which seem to relate especially to the apostle Peter, and yet are not clear in their meaning unless referred to the Church, which he is acknowledged to have represented in a figure on account of the primacy which he bore among the disciples. Such is I will give unto you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and other similar passages. In the same way, Judas represents those Jews who were Christs enemies" (Commentary on Psalm 108 1 [A.D. 415]).
"Who is ignorant that the first of the apostles is the most blessed Peter?" (Commentary on John 56:1 [A.D. 416]).
If not, then...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.