Posted on 04/02/2019 1:37:03 PM PDT by SleeperCatcher
Leftist policies are reaching new levels of insanity in Massachusetts, as Suffolk County DA Rachael Rollins pushes her highly contested no-prosecute list into action.
The list gives a green light to a number of arrest-worthy offenses including trespassing, shoplifting, disorderly conduct, and wanton or malicious destruction of property. In other words, local law enforcement is being directed by the district attorney to stand idly by while miscreants steal and destroy property.
The directive from Rollins also orders police to refuse to cooperate with ICE in the arresting of illegal immigrants at the courthouse no matter the severity of their crimes.
(Excerpt) Read more at thenationalsentinel.com ...
Bookmark
If government is going to abdicare its responsibilities for these crimes,
it reverts back to the people and the people will deal with the criminals.
Doesn’t LA already overlook shoplifting?
Boston, and you real what you sow. You sowed liberalism now reap your disrespect.
But let someone steal an Amazon package off her porch and they go to prison
Bostonians should watch the KOMO news special “Seattle is Dying”. The laws that are being proposed will turn Boston into the same type of cesspool that Seattle has become.
Post the “Seattle is Dying” video to him; it is their future ...
This is the end result. Please share with as many as you can. The reality of what the Marxist Liberals has in store for every state and city is real.
Seattle Is Dying (as are many cities run by Marxist Liberals)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpAi70WWBlw
A true nitwit affirmative-action loser. It would be sad if some criminal have her an experience.
Charges for which the Default is to Decline Prosecuting (unless supervisor permission is obtained).
Trespassing
Shoplifting (including offenses that are essentially shoplifting but charged as larceny)
Larceny under $250
Disorderly conduct
Disturbing the peace
Receiving stolen property
Minor driving offenses, including operating with a suspend or revoked license
Breaking and entering where it is into a vacant property or where it is for the purpose of sleeping or seeking refuge from the cold and there is no actual damage to property
Wanton or malicious destruction of property
Threats excluding domestic violence
Minor in possession of alcohol
Drug possession
Drug possession with intent to distribute
A stand alone resisting arrest charge, i.e. cases where a person is charged with resisting arrest and that is the only charge
A resisting arrest charge combined with only charges that all fall under the list of charges to decline to prosecute, e.g. resisting arrest charge combined only with a trespassing charge
Instead of prosecuting, these cases should be (1) outright dismissed prior to arraignment or (2) where appropriate, diverted and treated as a civil infraction for which community service is satisfactory, restitution is satisfactory or engagement with appropriate community-based no-cost programming, job training or schooling is satisfactory. In the exceptional circumstances where prosecution of one of these charges is warranted, the line DA must first seek permission from his or her supervisor. If necessary, arraignment will be continued to allow for consultation with supervisor. Thus, there will be an avenue for prosecuting these misdemeanors when necessary but it will be appropriately overseen by experienced prosecutors.
Note: this is essentially already happening for drug possession cases in Roxbury and Dorchester District Court. - https://rollins4da.com/policy/charges-to-be-declined/
Sadly, Suffolk County is not just Boston,
Map of Suffolk County showing (clockwise from bottom) Boston (red), Chelsea (yellow), Revere (green), and Winthrop (blue). Interior water features such as Boston Harbor are filled in by the color of the containing city.
Politically speaking, Suffolk County supports the Democratic Party overwhelmingly. No Republican presidential candidate has won there since Calvin Coolidge in 1924. In 2012 Barack Obama received 77.4% of the vote, compared to 20.8% for Mitt Romney. In the 2014 gubernatorial election, Martha Coakley carried the county by a 32.4% margin, while losing the election statewide by 48.4 to 46.5%.
The same state that infamously first legalized homosexual marriage.
Those who are not sufficiently controlled from within, by God and a sound conscience, must sooner or later be controlled from without, necessitating the growth of civil government.
Robert Winthrop (May 12, 1809 November 16, 1894), and Speaker of the House from 1838 to 1840, and later president of the Massachusetts Bible Society, explained that, All societies of men must be governed in some way or other. The less they may have of stringent State Government, the more they must have of individual self-government. The less they rely on public law or physical force, the more they must rely on private moral restraint. Men, in a word, must necessarily be controlled, either by a power within them, or by a power without them; either by the Word of God, or by the strong arm of man; either by the Bible, or by the bayonet. It may do for other countries and other governments to talk about the State supporting religion. Here, under our own free institutions, it is Religion which must support the State." (Speech to the Massachusetts Bible Society (1849-05-28), quoted in Robert Winthrop, Addresses and Speeches on Various Occasions, Little, Brown & Co., 1852, p. 172)
How is her directive legal? If those offenses remain crimes subject to arrest and prosecution under statute, how can she direct the police to disobey those laws? I get that prosecutors decline to prosecute cases all the time. For both sensible and boneheaded reasons. But she is wrong to demand that the police deputies of her jurisdiction be selective in what criminal acts they make an arrest on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.