Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/30/2019 4:58:07 AM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

He’s exactly correct. Release of some portions of it would be quite illegal.


2 posted on 03/30/2019 4:59:28 AM PDT by nesnah (Liberals - the petulant children of politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

What does the law mean to the Rats?


3 posted on 03/30/2019 5:01:38 AM PDT by duckman ( Not tired of winning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Place the report in a pit with a thousand rattlesnakes and tell them to go for it.


4 posted on 03/30/2019 5:07:28 AM PDT by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

What’s the statute that identifies attempting to coerce someone into breaking the law?

Nadler can be tied down with that. And it would change the conversation.


6 posted on 03/30/2019 5:11:29 AM PDT by Principled (No one will conquer America, from within or without, until its citizenry are disarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

antics with semantics. It can be modestly redacted then released. That’s what Barr says he’s doing.


7 posted on 03/30/2019 5:35:32 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

I suppose this is technically true.
It is also true that the President can declassify anything he wants.
To some extent, I think a heck of a lot of stuff should be declassified, let us see it all, and let justice be done though the heavens fall.

I’m not sure this that is one of those cases where the names of US assets embedded in foreign countries would be revealed and thus the lives of Americans put at risk. I certainly wouldn’t want to do something like that. But I suspect most of the “redacted” stuff is redacted because it’s just darn embarrassing to certain US politicians. That’s the stuff I really want to see, and I don’t think it should be withheld.


9 posted on 03/30/2019 5:52:52 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

If someone was on a jury that chose not to go after Trump, imagine what the democrats would do to them.


10 posted on 03/30/2019 6:13:04 AM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

If Congress is serious about wanting the full report released, they can enact a law requiring such action. That would be foolish, but would be legal. Trying to force the AG to release Grand Jury and classified material is not proper.


13 posted on 03/30/2019 6:17:51 AM PDT by etcb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Why redacted?


14 posted on 03/30/2019 6:31:25 AM PDT by onedoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Congress wants the full report.

Show us the enacted legislation demanding that from President Trump. Then we will see about it after Trump vetoes it.

Mr.Trump. They play the game. Play it right back.


15 posted on 03/30/2019 7:13:49 AM PDT by Rapscallion (Shun them until they say they are sorry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

The left wants state secrets revealed, so they can give them to our enemies.


17 posted on 03/30/2019 7:57:30 AM PDT by JimRed ( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
U.S. House Republican says it would be illegal to release full Mueller report [Doug Collins]

This is true.

And this is WHY the Dems will continue to howl about it FOREVER!!

What are they HIDING???!!!


21 posted on 03/30/2019 9:51:23 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
He is correct. That full report will contain or link to surveillance on perfectly innocent people who do not deserve to have their entire lives published, and in fact are protected from it by the 4th Amendment.

This is not the first time they've tried to maneuver Trump into breaking the law - recall that Rosenstein originally recommended firing Comey and suddenly turned around and called it obstruction when Trump took his advice. It was at that point that it was obvious that lying and betrayal were going to be the cornerstone of the case.

22 posted on 03/30/2019 9:58:52 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson