Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Democratic Leadership Warns It Will Cut Off Any Firms That Challenge Incumbents
The Intercept ^ | 3/22/19 | Akela Lacy

Posted on 03/25/2019 7:28:20 AM PDT by blueyon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: blueyon

This is Pelosi putting a leash on AOC. It stops her radical backing group “Justice Democrats” from using dem resources against other democrats.


21 posted on 03/25/2019 8:03:01 AM PDT by DeathBeforeDishonor1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

This is perfectly legal. If you are paying the bill of these contractors you can stipulate conditions such as this.The GOP do it as well.

This is a shot at AOC.


22 posted on 03/25/2019 8:04:49 AM PDT by DeathBeforeDishonor1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
IOW, they had better not even THINK of leaving the Plantation..................

Say John Kasich decided to run against Trump next year and the Republican strategy firm of Dewey, Cheatham and Howe signed on to advise his campaign. Once Kasich got his butt kicked in the primaries do you think D, C & H should get any more GOP business from the Trump administration?

23 posted on 03/25/2019 8:04:51 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Of course not, but we don’t claim the Cloak of Diversity all for ourselves...............


24 posted on 03/25/2019 8:07:10 AM PDT by Red Badger (We are headed for a Civil War. It won't be nice like the last one....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

I think they are actually afraid they will be challenged because their constituents will see collusion was a big lie and they think they deserve a lifetime appointment in the house and senate. They probably also know how crazy people like aoc is going to bring their party down.


25 posted on 03/25/2019 8:16:34 AM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Lets appoint a special council to see if there is any collusion. I think there is. I also have evidence Nanzi Pee Lousy is into golden showers.

Mueller is free now. Let’s GO!


26 posted on 03/25/2019 8:18:40 AM PDT by John Milner (Marching for Peace is like breathing for food.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

According to Black’s Law Dictionary:

Blackmail: “term for extortion and it is a criminal act where a person will attempt to get money from another person by threats.”

https://thelawdictionary.org/blackmail/

Extortion: Preston v. Bacon, 4 Conn. 4S0. Extortion consists in any
public officer unlawfully taking, by color of his office,
from any person any money or thing of value that is not
due to him. or more than his due. Code Ga. 1882,...

https://thelawdictionary.org/extortion/

rwood


27 posted on 03/25/2019 8:19:47 AM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

According to Black’s Law Dictionary:

Blackmail: “term for extortion and it is a criminal act where a person will attempt to get money from another person by threats.”

https://thelawdictionary.org/blackmail/

Extortion: Preston v. Bacon, 4 Conn. 4S0. Extortion consists in any
public officer unlawfully taking, by color of his office,
from any person any money or thing of value that is not
due to him. or more than his due. Code Ga. 1882,...

https://thelawdictionary.org/extortion/

rwood


28 posted on 03/25/2019 8:19:47 AM PDT by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Democrats....... stop the threats or forfeit your lives


29 posted on 03/25/2019 8:20:14 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. N.P. N.C. +12) Honduras must be invaded to protect America from invasion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

RICO.


30 posted on 03/25/2019 8:20:18 AM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

To be cut off from latent Fascists is a good thing!


31 posted on 03/25/2019 8:20:21 AM PDT by Richard Axtell (The New Day is here! Prepare yourself for "Democratic Totalitarianism!" Beto said so!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Democrat dissent = Bicycle rack of perptuity.


32 posted on 03/25/2019 8:21:21 AM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Cool. This means I can refuse baking the cake then, right?


33 posted on 03/25/2019 8:22:30 AM PDT by TADSLOS (I gotta see the candy first, then I get in the van. IÂ’m not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
Does this mean that anybody who supports Joe Crowley trying to win back his seat against Ocasio-Cortez will be banned by the party?

-PJ

34 posted on 03/25/2019 8:29:23 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Anyone still think this isnt the New National Socialist Party of America now?


35 posted on 03/25/2019 8:42:14 AM PDT by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Does this mean that anybody who supports Joe Crowley trying to win back his seat against Ocasio-Cortez will be banned by the party?

This question really needs to be asked on a national platform, would love to listen to the hypocrites answer it.


36 posted on 03/25/2019 8:52:40 AM PDT by heshtesh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

“Why is it illegal?”

Sounds like a violation of the Sherman Anti-trust Act, to me. They are “refusing to deal” with service providers that provides services to a competitor.


37 posted on 03/25/2019 8:55:12 AM PDT by Jewbacca (The residents of Iroquois territory may not determine whether Jews may live in Jerusalem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jewbacca
Sounds like a violation of the Sherman Anti-trust Act, to me.

LOL! Which side is supposed to be the monopoly?

38 posted on 03/25/2019 9:01:47 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Talk about trying to influence an election. Throw them in jail!


39 posted on 03/25/2019 9:02:36 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg
Where is this illegal?

In the political campaign contribution, finance, money transfers and loans that fund the DemoRat Party operations, purchases and campaigns. They will have significant legal violations and fraudulent paperwork.

They are sitting ducks for a Dinesh D'Souza investigation.

40 posted on 03/25/2019 9:20:46 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (America NEEDS Mob Rule, another European and Mid East World War and a universal Draft)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson