Posted on 03/17/2019 10:15:27 AM PDT by Libloather
Lock her up?
More and more, it appears the Justice Department should have tried to do just that to Hillary Clinton and that only nefarious interference kept the attempt from occurring.
My colleague Becket Adams is correct in writing that newly released testimony by disgraced FBI attorney Lisa Page makes former U.S. attorney general Loretta Lynch look blatantly dishonest and makes her infamous tarmac meeting with former president Bill Clinton look even sleazier than it already had. Specifically, despite sworn assurances to the contrary from Lynch, Page testified that Department of Justice officials repeatedly dissuaded the FBI from building a criminal case against Clinton for gross negligence in her handling of classified information.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
They better bus a move on this. What happens when another government official attempts Hillary' massive cornucopia of crimes? Let it happen and look away? Lock her up.
Right. I’ll believe it when I see it. Change my mind.
might want to get around to it at some point in the future.
“Might”???????
Oh wait... they are still trying to find the fake ‘russia collusion’ Lisa Page and the gang created.
Won’t happen - I absolutely guarantee it won’t happen. Barr is there to tie up the lose ends, tidy up the DOJ, and move on. He made his disdain for political theater very clear during his confirmation hearings.
And so he was back...yup found some emails...but nothing bad. Case closed.
So can they reopen it?I believe so because Comey did not actually have the power to close it.
The server setup WAS the “malign intent” and everybody knows it
Herself will die of ill health and dementia long before any action shall ever be taken, either against Herself or most of the others in that upper “charmed” circle. A few lower-level pawns may get ensnared, serve out some time, and probably since their future is ended anyway, will take the time to “be with their families”, i.e., living in their mom’s basement.
The DOJ has had all of the information for a lot longer than we have. Maybe a real criminal investigation has been quietly going on the whole time.
Even if the standard were “Malign Intent” she seems to meet that standard.
The unspoken real reason for Lynch’s obstruction of justice is that Clinton e-mailed the Pretendsident from this account. Over and Over. And he replied. Now, Obama said he learned about it on the news. And of course you must be “whitelisted” to send e-mail to the President. Therefore he lied and also was a witness in any trial (that is the BIG problem). Lynch’s loyalty is to Obama not Clinton.
Establishment Republicans need to get off their butts or we’re gonna vote them out of office...
Rosenstein isn't a white hat and will be leaving this week, and Sessions was afraid of his own shadow and is now gone.
There was nothing going on.
Democrat politicians are basically not subject to the laws of the United States.
They may be subject to the laws of the Democrat Party, although there’s a lot of flexibility on that.
The earliest it *might* happen is after Hillary’s state-sponsored funeral.
My 1st thought, may could might same ole crap with global warming too.
If one listens carefully to lefty news those words are imbedded in the narrative
Reopen the case for what reason? Its not like shes subject to the same laws that govern the little people.
Never. Gonna. Happen. I’ve given up hope that it will (and SHOULD!)
Next one will be way worse. They'll be powered by the kind of organization that put A-O-C in her congressional seat, not the sort of stupid idiots that backed up Hillary.
” Clinton should have been indicted. “!
until and unless the Clintons have charges brought up on them the Justice dept and everything related to it are lying horse crap and the whole federal gub mint are not to be bleieved about any damned thing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.